pre-Buddhism?

General forum on the teachings of all schools of Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. Topics specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
User avatar
Dragon
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:29 pm

pre-Buddhism?

Post by Dragon »

Before Buddhism (and, thus) enlightenment were identified and coined as common terms, what became of sentient beings? Is it like Christianity where no one was saved until Christ came to earth? Was no one enlightened before Gautama Buddha became enlightened?
User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
Posts: 17071
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA
Contact:

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Johnny Dangerous »

Dragon wrote:Before Buddhism (and, thus) enlightenment were identified and coined as common terms, what became of sentient beings? Is it like Christianity where no one was saved until Christ came to earth? Was no one enlightened before Gautama Buddha became enlightened?
There were previous Buddhas to Shakyamuni...and presumably, have always been by implication. Lots in the future too.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared

-Khunu Lama
User avatar
Dragon
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:29 pm

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Dragon »

Johnny Dangerous wrote: There were previous Buddhas to Shakyamuni...and presumably, have always been by implication. Lots in the future too.
If there were previous Buddhas, why was Gautama Buddha's story the first recorded? Or am I misunderstanding this and there were other writings passed down before Gautama Buddha's enlightenment?
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21906
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Grigoris »

Dragon wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote: There were previous Buddhas to Shakyamuni...and presumably, have always been by implication. Lots in the future too.
If there were previous Buddhas, why was Gautama Buddha's story the first recorded? Or am I misunderstanding this and there were other writings passed down before Gautama Buddha's enlightenment?
I imagine that it wasn't the first that was recorded, but like the stuff that was recorded about Shakyamuni Buddha, being impermanent phenomena, they were lost over time.

There are/were also Pratyeka or Pacceka Buddhas in the ages between supremely enlightened buddhas. Since they do not teach, and they do not have a sangha, they leave no real record of their existence.

There are references to some of them in the Jataka tales:
http://jathakakatha.org/english/index.p ... &Itemid=97
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bud/j5/j5022.htm
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Dragon
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:29 pm

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Dragon »

gregkavarnos wrote:
Dragon wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote: There were previous Buddhas to Shakyamuni...and presumably, have always been by implication. Lots in the future too.
If there were previous Buddhas, why was Gautama Buddha's story the first recorded? Or am I misunderstanding this and there were other writings passed down before Gautama Buddha's enlightenment?
I imagine that it wasn't the first that was recorded, but like the stuff that was recorded about Shakyamuni Buddha, being impermanent phenomena, they were lost over time.

There are/were also Pratyeka or Pacceka Buddhas in the ages between supremely enlightened buddhas. Since they do not teach, and they do not have a sangha, they leave no real record of their existence.

There are references to some of them in the Jataka tales:
http://jathakakatha.org/english/index.p ... &Itemid=97
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bud/j5/j5022.htm
Ah, thank you. So is this to suggest that Buddhism may, in fact, be an older religion than, let's say, Hinduism? I'm just trying to get an idea of whether or not Buddhism stemmed off of Hinduism like many suggest, or it was a separate entity occurring at the same time as, or even before, Hinduism.
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21906
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Grigoris »

Dragon wrote:Ah, thank you. So is this to suggest that Buddhism may, in fact, be an older religion than, let's say, Hinduism?
Well, there is not really such a thing as Hinduism, but... Let's just say that the Ramayana of Valmiki, for example, was apparently written in 500 or 400BCE (around the same time the Buddha was living) and the events depicted in the Mahabharata were from the 9th to 8th century BCE (some 400-500 years before Buddhas lifetime). But even these dates are pretty recent when you compare them to Ancient Greek (starting around 1600BCE) and Ancient Egyptian (staring around 3150 BCE) religions. And then if you compare it to Aboriginal Australian religious practices (some 20,000+ years ago), well, it all starts to fade into insignificance really.
I'm just trying to get an idea of whether or not Buddhism stemmed off of Hinduism like many suggest, or it was a separate entity occurring at the same time as, or even before, Hinduism.
Given the time frames, it was probably a break off from some form of "Hinduism".
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
Posts: 17071
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA
Contact:

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Johnny Dangerous »

Dragon wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote: There were previous Buddhas to Shakyamuni...and presumably, have always been by implication. Lots in the future too.
If there were previous Buddhas, why was Gautama Buddha's story the first recorded? Or am I misunderstanding this and there were other writings passed down before Gautama Buddha's enlightenment?

Well Gautama told of other Buddhas, and some say that there is some evidence, but it can be inferred that at least some were prior to things like written records in our cycle of things..An eon in ancient Indian thought is huge, and if there is anything to it then many, many, things will have been forgotten, including the identity of previous Buddhas.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared

-Khunu Lama
User avatar
Dragon
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:29 pm

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Dragon »

Hmm, interesting. Thanks, everyone. Food for thought.

I can't help but wonder, though, are buddhas merely just... 'aliens?' Perhaps not in the literal sense of the word, with the silver skin and large black cat eyes. No, no. I mean that they may come from a different dimension of sorts, since they have been around for so many eons, and are so unique and, well, enlightened!
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Astus »

From a Buddhist perspective, the Buddha only discovered what was known before him by previous buddhas. And, as mentioned, there were pratyekabuddhas when the Dharma was generally extinct.

As for the idea that Buddhism is some sort of offshoot of Hinduism, not at all. For instance, today reincarnation is a core element of Hinduism, however, it was most likely originally spread by Buddhism in India. In the Buddhist canon itself you get a nice description of the local religions, and that consisted mostly of various ascetic orders, among them the Jainas being the most outstanding, the old pantheon of gods that can be connected to the Vedas and generally to Indo-European paganism, and there were the brahmanas doing their rituals. What appears today as Hinduism, that's quite a different story.

You may want to look into some studies in this area, like those of Johannes Bronkhorst:

Greater Magadha: Studies in the Culture of Early India
Buddhism in the Shadow of Brahmanism
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 5251
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:23 pm
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by DNS »

See this article I wrote:
http://www.dhammawiki.com/index.php?title=28_Buddhas

The previous Buddhas may have lived in prehistoric times, before written language or could have been from a previous world cycle, perhaps a different planet; i.e. prior solar system (as we know from astronomy and the Tripitaka, planets and stars are born, evolve, perish, and get reconstituted back again).
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21906
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Grigoris »

Astus wrote:For instance, today reincarnation is a core element of Hinduism, however, it was most likely originally spread by Buddhism in India.
Do you have a (non-Buddhist) source for this view?

Thanks!
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Konchog1
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:30 am

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Konchog1 »

Dragon wrote:
Johnny Dangerous wrote: There were previous Buddhas to Shakyamuni...and presumably, have always been by implication. Lots in the future too.
If there were previous Buddhas, why was Gautama Buddha's story the first recorded? Or am I misunderstanding this and there were other writings passed down before Gautama Buddha's enlightenment?
Remember in high school when you heard about when Grok discovered how to make fire? Neither do I.
Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.

-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra

"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."

-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats
User avatar
Huifeng
Posts: 1477
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Huifeng »

gregkavarnos wrote:
Astus wrote:For instance, today reincarnation is a core element of Hinduism, however, it was most likely originally spread by Buddhism in India.
Do you have a (non-Buddhist) source for this view?

Thanks!
You can check out something like Gombrich's What the Buddha Thought, or Bronkhorst's books above.

Basic argument:

Dating various Indian texts, the earliest appearances of what we now call "reincarnation" (or whatever) appear with the Buddhist texts.

The earliest non-Buddhist sources that come even close are such as the Brhadaranyaka, Chandogya, etc. upanisads; but we're not sure if they really pre-date the Buddha.

And what they say is certainly quite different from what either Buddhists or Hindu ideas now state about "reincarnation".

Jainism may be an exception. But Jainism is certainly heterodox from a Vedic / Brahmanic / Hindu point of view. And the problem of sourcing and dating Jainist texts is really problematic. (Ie. the only ones we have are much later than the Jaina himself.)

~~ Huifeng
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21906
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Grigoris »

Huifeng wrote:You can check out something like Gombrich's What the Buddha Thought, or Bronkhorst's books above.

Basic argument:

Dating various Indian texts, the earliest appearances of what we now call "reincarnation" (or whatever) appear with the Buddhist texts.

The earliest non-Buddhist sources that come even close are such as the Brhadaranyaka, Chandogya, etc. upanisads; but we're not sure if they really pre-date the Buddha.

And what they say is certainly quite different from what either Buddhists or Hindu ideas now state about "reincarnation".

Jainism may be an exception. But Jainism is certainly heterodox from a Vedic / Brahmanic / Hindu point of view. And the problem of sourcing and dating Jainist texts is really problematic. (Ie. the only ones we have are much later than the Jaina himself.)

~~ Huifeng
Hmmmmm... Interesting! Funny thing is that currently it is such a central teaching and add the fact that most Westerners know/understand reincarnation from a "Hindu" (atman-centred) perspective, that it seems bizarre that it was a concept that was introduced into "Hinudism".
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Astus »

gregkavarnos wrote:Hmmmmm... Interesting! Funny thing is that currently it is such a central teaching and add the fact that most Westerners know/understand reincarnation from a "Hindu" (atman-centred) perspective, that it seems bizarre that it was a concept that was introduced into "Hinudism".
I can't specify a source for this one, whether it is from India or not, but the idea of reincarnation was known to Europeans to some extent before the 19th century rise of Orientalism. In the ancient Greek context it is called metempsychosis and in Judaism it is gilgul. It is also known in Hermeticism.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
philji
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 2:26 pm

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by philji »

There has been some talk here about reincarnation being introduced into Hinduism BT Buddhism. however ado not the Upanishads and Bhagavad Gita pre date Buddhism? These texts specifically teach the concept of an atman reincarnating. The Buddhist view of course is very different.
Anders
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Anders »

Huifeng wrote: Dating various Indian texts, the earliest appearances of what we now call "reincarnation" (or whatever) appear with the Buddhist texts.
If nothing else, the Buddhist texts also tell us that there were other views of reincarnation current in the Buddha's day, given the Buddha's commentary on these.
"Even if my body should be burnt to death in the fires of hell
I would endure it for myriad lifetimes
As your companion in practice"

--- Gandavyuha Sutra
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Astus »

philji wrote:There has been some talk here about reincarnation being introduced into Hinduism BT Buddhism. however ado not the Upanishads and Bhagavad Gita pre date Buddhism? These texts specifically teach the concept of an atman reincarnating. The Buddhist view of course is very different.
The Bhagavad Gita's current form was settled around the 4th century CE, although parts of it are assumed to be as old as the 5th c. BCE. The early Upanishads don't describe reincarnation but rather a path of the soul to Brahman through different stages (Sun and Moon).
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Astus »

Anders wrote:If nothing else, the Buddhist texts also tell us that there were other views of reincarnation current in the Buddha's day, given the Buddha's commentary on these.
Reincarnation is said to be known in the Magadha culture, but that's different from the Brahmanic-Vedic culture. Since it was Buddhism that spread out in India (empire of Ashoka) it served as the medium of the doctrine.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
User avatar
Huifeng
Posts: 1477
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am

Re: pre-Buddhism?

Post by Huifeng »

philji wrote:There has been some talk here about reincarnation being introduced into Hinduism BT Buddhism. however ado not the Upanishads and Bhagavad Gita pre date Buddhism? These texts specifically teach the concept of an atman reincarnating. The Buddhist view of course is very different.
Most of the Upanisads (possibly a couple of exceptions) and the Gita are post-Buddhist, despite their own claims to be incredibly ancient.

~~ Huifeng
Post Reply

Return to “Mahāyāna Buddhism”