Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:07 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 854
Correct me if I'm wrong, but In general Mahayana, the general idea seems to be that achieving Buddhahood will prevent one from further benefiting sentient beings (at least at the end of one's life as a Buddha) and that for this reason, bodhisattvas strive to remain as bodhisattvas for kalpas to benefit sentient beings. Where did the idea of Buddhahood not being the end of the path first emerge? I have received Dzogchen teachings that, IMO, fully explain how and why upon realization, one never stops benefiting sentient beings, but does general Vajrayana go into it as well?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Sherlock wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but In general Mahayana, the general idea seems to be that achieving Buddhahood will prevent one from further benefiting sentient beings



No. This idea is incorrect. The goal of Mahāyāna Buddhism is non-abiding nirvana in which a buddha always acts on behalf of sentient beings, as opposed to the hīnayāna concept of buddhahood in which a buddha ceases his activity at parnirvana.

M

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 854
Then why are there general Mahayana aspirations about vowing not to achieve Buddhahood until all sentient beings are liberated etc?

Wouldn't it be far better, even from the Mahayana perspective, to achieve Buddhahood as soon as possible to really benefit sentient beings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Sherlock wrote:
Then why are there general Mahayana aspirations about vowing not to achieve Buddhahood until all sentient beings are liberated etc?



There are three aspirations for buddhahood: king, captain and shepard. The aspiration you mention above is the shepard type -- it not the one commonly taught, for example, in Tibetan Buddhism.

In Tibetan Buddhism the king-like aspiration is taught, i.e. may I achieve complete buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:34 pm
Posts: 50
Malcolm wrote:
Sherlock wrote:
Then why are there general Mahayana aspirations about vowing not to achieve Buddhahood until all sentient beings are liberated etc?



There are three aspirations for buddhahood: king, captain and shepard. The aspiration you mention above is the shepard type -- it not the one commonly taught, for example, in Tibetan Buddhism.

In Tibetan Buddhism the king-like aspiration is taught, i.e. may I achieve complete buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings.


I can feel that I am the last sentient being in samsara and everyone else is a Buddha trying to make me realize.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
trevor wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
Sherlock wrote:
Then why are there general Mahayana aspirations about vowing not to achieve Buddhahood until all sentient beings are liberated etc?



There are three aspirations for buddhahood: king, captain and shepard. The aspiration you mention above is the shepard type -- it not the one commonly taught, for example, in Tibetan Buddhism.

In Tibetan Buddhism the king-like aspiration is taught, i.e. may I achieve complete buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings.


I can feel that I am the last sentient being in samsara and everyone else is a Buddha trying to make me realize.



Sure, one can feel many things.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:57 am
Posts: 231
This idea of not becoming a Buddha until all beings have emerged from samsara is in some sutras I've noticed.

It's really very weird. I usually hope when I see things like this that it is just some gross mistranslation.

I'm sure you could rationalize it with something like, "beings that don't have the karma to come in contact with a Buddha can come in contact with a Bodhisattva of yada yada level".

My first inclination is to say the people declaring such a thing in the sutras are stupid, but in the context of the sutra they are very esteemed and wise Bodhisattvas. So in order to say they are stupid I would have to say the writers of the sutras are stupid. Unfortunately there are rules about saying such a thing, so I will reserve my judgement until at least a time that I have studied the sutras to a degree I am comfortable with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:25 am
Posts: 164
Location: Lima, Peru
Ramon1920 wrote:
This idea of not becoming a Buddha until all beings have emerged from samsara is in some sutras I've noticed.


It is part of Mahayana Buddhism 101. There are many books that explain the reason of existence for this motivation, in depth.

Ramon1920 wrote:
It's really very weird. I usually hope when I see things like this that it is just some gross mistranslation.

I'm sure you could rationalize it with something like, "beings that don't have the karma to come in contact with a Buddha can come in contact with a Bodhisattva of yada yada level".

My first inclination is to say the people declaring such a thing in the sutras are stupid, but in the context of the sutra they are very esteemed and wise Bodhisattvas. So in order to say they are stupid I would have to say the writers of the sutras are stupid.


Oh my, oh my...

Let me make you a suggestion: Read more books on buddhism at the mahayana level, and eventually you will have an understanding for this specific motivation. You can do it, and this will benefit you more than jumping to conclusions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:55 am 
Online

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Posts: 2193
Ramon1920 wrote:
This idea of not becoming a Buddha until all beings have emerged from samsara is in some sutras I've noticed.

It's really very weird. I usually hope when I see things like this that it is just some gross mistranslation.

I'm sure you could rationalize it with something like, "beings that don't have the karma to come in contact with a Buddha can come in contact with a Bodhisattva of yada yada level".

Close. I think the idea is that a Buddha like Sakyamuni has become nothing but Dharmakaya, which cannot be seen or heard. People need to be able to see and hear Dharma, otherwise they have no knowledge about it. So the pledge to not attain buddhahood is saying that they will continue to be accessible to sentient beings.

Quote:
The goal of Mahāyāna Buddhism is non-abiding nirvana in which a buddha always acts on behalf of sentient beings, as opposed to the hīnayāna concept of buddhahood in which a buddha ceases his activity at parnirvana.

Maybe so, but ya still can't see him!

_________________
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
trevor wrote:

I can feel that I am the last sentient being in samsara and everyone else is a Buddha trying to make me realize.


:namaste:

Oh.

Humble is the flame recognizing the fire.
Humble is the breath recognizing the air.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:06 pm
Posts: 952
muni wrote:
Humble is the flame recognizing the fire.
Humble is the breath recognizing the air.


:woohoo: :good:

Buddha bonfire. Do we get burned? Marshmallows?
popcorn?
:popcorn:

Gotta find the recipe for cookin' dharma . . . :stirthepot:
:reading:

Next people will be saying not even the end is a beginning . . . :broke:

_________________
YinYana Buddhism


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kunzang and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group