Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 2:36 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 141
I think the difference here between Mahayana thought and Theravada thought isn't as big as it seems from some comments. Part of it I'm afraid is just some philosophical "battle for superior righteousness": pointing out that Mahayana practitioners strive to achieve Buddhahood for all beings, whereas Theravada practitioners care only about their own enlightenment, and therefore Theravada must be a selfish teaching, and inferior.

If in Theravada practitioners are solely concerned with themselves, how can there be Theravada teachers? The moment one realizes compassion, the wish to liberate all beings comes naturally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:25 am
Posts: 164
Location: Lima, Peru
Arjan Dirkse wrote:
I think the difference here between Mahayana thought and Theravada thought isn't as big as it seems from some comments. Part of it I'm afraid is just some philosophical "battle for superior righteousness": pointing out that Mahayana practitioners strive to achieve Buddhahood for all beings, whereas Theravada practitioners care only about their own enlightenment, and therefore Theravada must be a selfish teaching, and inferior.

If in Theravada practitioners are solely concerned with themselves, how can there be Theravada teachers? The moment one realizes compassion, the wish to liberate all beings comes naturally.


On the other camp, today at a Theravada forum one vehement Theravadin claimed that "all Theravada teachnigs are focused to help you reach Enlighnment while in Tibetan Buddhism mostly everything is focused on helping others and little more than that"... :crazy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:20 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Posts: 2193
Theravadins have a very plausible and credible gripe with the Vajrayana, and are polite enough to hold their tongue mostly. I personally have nothing but respect for them. My post quoting Gompopa was simply a response trying to explain how there isn't a 'right' and 'wrong' form of enlightenment.

_________________
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:25 am
Posts: 164
Location: Lima, Peru
smcj wrote:
Theravadins have a very plausible and credible gripe with the Vajrayana, and are polite enough to hold their tongue mostly.


The ones i have met refuse to take the effort to understand Vajrayana due to way too much predjuice and samskaras; and end up disparaging it with arguments that show not being able to have a deep understanding of it. I say this with sadness, not with anger.

Right now i'm abandoning said Theravada group i mentioned previously, exactly because of this.

_________________
If this is a virtual sangha, do we achieve virtualization instead of realization?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:48 am 
Online

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Posts: 2193
Quote:
The ones i have met refuse to take the effort to understand Vajrayana due to way too much predjuice and samskaras; and end up disparaging it with arguments that show not being able to have a deep understanding of it. I say this with sadness, not with anger.

What they are saying, in effect, is that the Theravada path is karmically correct for them.

Quote:
Right now i'm abandoning said Theravada group i mentioned previously, exactly because of this.

What you are saying, in effect, is that the Vajrayana path is karmically correct for you.

Neither is a problem.

_________________
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:57 am
Posts: 231
villkorkarma wrote:
So said Dalai Lama in the book A simple path. How come?
"enlightenment just for oneself isnt right enlightenment according to mahayanawiew."


Does anyone have a page number or the quote in context?

I think probably there will be a good explanation in the book itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group