Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Sat Dec 27, 2014 6:56 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:25 pm
Posts: 58
Thank you very very much, Namdrol-la. :namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:14 pm
Posts: 3
I have met countless teachers and Rinpoches. From HH Dalai Lama and HH 17th Karmapa to you name it. But I NEVER experienced what I felt like the time I first met and sat in front of Thrangu Rinpoche (my root guru). Even before either of us said a single word, I knew right then that he would be my root guru. He is also the one that ordained me.

_________________
Karma Lodro Senge

If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion. — His Holiness Dalai Lama


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:30 pm
Posts: 136
I'm not much of a practitioner. When I finally felt I had to do ngon.dro and approach the vajrayana I didn't really know who my root guru was. The teacher who gave me the practices, empowerments and instruction was highly respected, but I thought he probably wasn't my root guru as I thought I would need a root guru to be someone who understood English so I could communicate directly with them. But the more I got into ngon.dro practice, the more those preconceptions dropped away and the presence of one particular lama began to haunt me as if embedded in the practices, and that was what was essential for me. That's how I found out who it was (which encompasses other teachers as his manifestation). Just my very limited experience. May or may not be relevant.

_________________
"When a Dzogchen Yogi hears Shakyamuni Buddha turning the Wheel of the Dharma of the Four Noble Truths he hears Samathabhadra proclaiming the most profound Dzogpachenpo." - Nyoshul Khen Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
Posts: 739
Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
... :namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm
Posts: 1967
More than one of my Gurus has has humbly stated that all Gurus are one. Practice Guruyoga and all are included.

I have know others who tell their students that they are their Root Guru, or describe what they think portrays those qualities and let gullible followers draw the obvious conclusion.

_________________
Left


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 289
Location: Taiwan
Blue Garuda wrote:
More than one of my Gurus has has humbly stated that all Gurus are one. Practice Guruyoga and all are included.

I have know others who tell their students that they are their Root Guru, or describe what they think portrays those qualities and let gullible followers draw the obvious conclusion.


Or one can go even deeper and state that the state of vidya is the guru, and all gurus are included within this state of vidya. These external activities between gurus and students are not more than a form of ritual that is followed by the traditions that is based on ritualistic performance and skillful means. The essence of guru-student structure is having a guru to guide the student personally, here the guru knows everything about the student, and so know exactly how to guide him directly, the student's understanding of the meaning is solely due to the teacher's guidance. However, in modern times this is not usually the case, especially due to the fact the the gurus are dealing with the masses of students, not dealing with them individually, so when a student realized the meaning, it is usually based on their own studies. The transmission, empowerment and so on, are merely a form of ritual, these are not the cause of the student's realization of the meaning. The student can say he read the book of certain writer and attained realization of the meaning, so the writer is considered his root guru, but actually this is not the case, the student is responsible for his own realization, not the writer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:49 am
Posts: 26
Jyoti wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:
More than one of my Gurus has has humbly stated that all Gurus are one. Practice Guruyoga and all are included.

I have know others who tell their students that they are their Root Guru, or describe what they think portrays those qualities and let gullible followers draw the obvious conclusion.


Or one can go even deeper and state that the state of vidya is the guru, and all gurus are included within this state of vidya. These external activities between gurus and students are not more than a form of ritual that is followed by the traditions that is based on ritualistic performance and skillful means. The essence of guru-student structure is having a guru to guide the student personally, here the guru knows everything about the student, and so know exactly how to guide him directly, the student's understanding of the meaning is solely due to the teacher's guidance. However, in modern times this is not usually the case, especially due to the fact the the gurus are dealing with the masses of students, not dealing with them individually, so when a student realized the meaning, it is usually based on their own studies. The transmission, empowerment and so on, are merely a form of ritual, these are not the cause of the student's realization of the meaning. The student can say he read the book of certain writer and attained realization of the meaning, so the writer is considered his root guru, but actually this is not the case, the student is responsible for his own realization, not the writer.


Last edited by humanpreta on Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:49 am
Posts: 26
Jyoti wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:
More than one of my Gurus has has humbly stated that all Gurus are one. Practice Guruyoga and all are included.

I have know others who tell their students that they are their Root Guru, or describe what they think portrays those qualities and let gullible followers draw the obvious conclusion.


Or one can go even deeper and state that the state of vidya is the guru, and all gurus are included within this state of vidya. These external activities between gurus and students are not more than a form of ritual that is followed by the traditions that is based on ritualistic performance and skillful means. The essence of guru-student structure is having a guru to guide the student personally, here the guru knows everything about the student, and so know exactly how to guide him directly, the student's understanding of the meaning is solely due to the teacher's guidance. However, in modern times this is not usually the case, especially due to the fact the the gurus are dealing with the masses of students, not dealing with them individually, so when a student realized the meaning, it is usually based on their own studies. The transmission, empowerment and so on, are merely a form of ritual, these are not the cause of the student's realization of the meaning. The student can say he read the book of certain writer and attained realization of the meaning, so the writer is considered his root guru, but actually this is not the case, the student is responsible for his own realization, not the writer.


:toilet:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3144
Jyoti wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:
More than one of my Gurus has has humbly stated that all Gurus are one. Practice Guruyoga and all are included.

I have know others who tell their students that they are their Root Guru, or describe what they think portrays those qualities and let gullible followers draw the obvious conclusion.


Or one can go even deeper and state that the state of vidya is the guru, and all gurus are included within this state of vidya. These external activities between gurus and students are not more than a form of ritual that is followed by the traditions that is based on ritualistic performance and skillful means. The essence of guru-student structure is having a guru to guide the student personally, here the guru knows everything about the student, and so know exactly how to guide him directly, the student's understanding of the meaning is solely due to the teacher's guidance. However, in modern times this is not usually the case, especially due to the fact the the gurus are dealing with the masses of students, not dealing with them individually, so when a student realized the meaning, it is usually based on their own studies. The transmission, empowerment and so on, are merely a form of ritual, these are not the cause of the student's realization of the meaning. The student can say he read the book of certain writer and attained realization of the meaning, so the writer is considered his root guru, but actually this is not the case, the student is responsible for his own realization, not the writer.


Yes, the vidya is the true Guru. It cannot be fathomed by the conceptual mind and so, based on the merits and aspiration of student, the outer Guru appears and indicate the true Guru, the vidya, to the student.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 6:42 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10309
Location: Greece
A little something from the text Mahamudra - The Ocean of True Meaning by the 9th Karmapa Wangchug Dorje:
Quote:
The teacher who is guiding should at best have completed the qualities of abandonment and realization himself, and know the level of development of the students. If such a teacher is not available, it should be someone who has not just requested, obtained, and practiced the Dharma in a superficial manner, and left it at that, but rather someone who has himself practiced with perseverance and brought forth faultless meditative experiences, and who can guide others in accordance with it. Other kinds of guidance, like the boisterous instructions of a charlatan, the invented instructions of a pretentious person, the textual explanations of someone with little knowledge, and the misleading instructions of a braggart should be avoided. The word explanations of a scholar, the practical instructions of a great meditator, the guidance based on experience of a yogi, the wisdom instructions of a realized master, and the pointing-out instructions for old woman are compatible in purpose.

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 3:08 am
Posts: 428
Location: Trāyastriṃśa. Just kidding. What a cool sanksrit word, huh?
:woohoo:
gregkavarnos wrote:
A little something from the text Mahamudra - The Ocean of True Meaning by the 9th Karmapa Wangchug Dorje:
Quote:
The teacher who is guiding should at best have completed the qualities of abandonment and realization himself, and know the level of development of the students. If such a teacher is not available, it should be someone who has not just requested, obtained, and practiced the Dharma in a superficial manner, and left it at that, but rather someone who has himself practiced with perseverance and brought forth faultless meditative experiences, and who can guide others in accordance with it. Other kinds of guidance, like the boisterous instructions of a charlatan, the invented instructions of a pretentious person, the textual explanations of someone with little knowledge, and the misleading instructions of a braggart should be avoided. The word explanations of a scholar, the practical instructions of a great meditator, the guidance based on experience of a yogi, the wisdom instructions of a realized master, and the pointing-out instructions for old woman are compatible in purpose.


Should that read "The pointing-out instructions of an old woman?"

What is the Karmapa referring to there? Old Dakinis?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:10 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10309
Location: Greece
No. I do believe he is referring to pointing out instructions that were given by some famous Mahamudra master (that alludes me right now) to his mother. That type (or class) of pointing out instruction. I imagine, given the social circumstances of women in Tibet-of-old, it means pointing out instructions for an uneducated (or non-intellectual) follower that has heartfelt faith as their mainstay.

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 3:08 am
Posts: 428
Location: Trāyastriṃśa. Just kidding. What a cool sanksrit word, huh?
gregkavarnos wrote:
No. I do believe he is referring to pointing out instructions that were given by some famous Mahamudra master (that alludes me right now) to his mother. That type (or class) of pointing out instruction. I imagine, given the social circumstances of women in Tibet-of-old, it means pointing out instructions for an uneducated (or non-intellectual) follower that has heartfelt faith as their mainstay.


That would make sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:25 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10309
Location: Greece
Actually, now that I think about it, it was a pointing-out by Gampopa to his mother.

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 4:12 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10309
Location: Greece
Nilasarasvati wrote:
Should that read "The pointing-out instructions of an old woman?"

What is the Karmapa referring to there? Old Dakinis?
Actually my dear Nila, it seems that your intuition trumps my misinformation. I received the abovementioned instruction this year at the Mahamudra retreat I attended and It seems that it is a mistake in the translation (my teacher was working directly from the Tibetan). It refers to pointing out instructions of/from an old woman. A vague, non-intellectual indirect method of pointing out, that may not even refer to the process, or even to what is being pointed out. He likened it to asking an old woman about the moon: in her description of the moon she may even point to the night sky, but will not even point in the direction of the moon itself, which happens to be sitting there plainly in sight.

So scratch out my scholarly explanation and hand me the well fitting dunce cap! Image

PS Yet another perfect example why one needs a well informed and qualified teacher.

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:26 am
Posts: 116
Westerners who take up Tibetan traditions often believe that following a guru will lead to bodhi. So to speak, if the guru eats garlic, the student will fart garlic. This is nonsense. Buddhas and gurus only point the way. They won't carry us through burning samsara or paddle us to the other shore. As much as westerners think, "I am different" they usually end up becoming guru followers. They never stand on the shoulder's of giants.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3144
Koji wrote:
Westerners who take up Tibetan traditions often believe that following a guru will lead to bodhi. So to speak, if the guru eats garlic, the student will fart garlic. This is nonsense. Buddhas and gurus only point the way. They won't carry us through burning samsara or paddle us to the other shore. As much as westerners think, "I am different" they usually end up becoming guru followers. They never stand on the shoulder's of giants.


The "No Guru, No Method, No Teacher" trip is a lot of hot air. Most people have no idea what t means to have a Guru, it certainly isn't farting garlic. :smile:

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:57 am
Posts: 231
There are some shameless people playing guru pressuring naive strangers into taking vows and committing to them before the students even know if they're qualified. Once that student is on the hook they take full advantage of that student as a cult slave and limit their communication with others by making rules about seeing other teachers or their students.

I have no problem saying if you take vows from such a con artist there is no fault in leaving them and warning others about their cult. You will not go to Vajra hell for taking vows from a con artist because they could not have had Vajrayana vows to give if they collected students for their personal use. Inform people in the Vajrayana community around you of what's going on, a lot can be accomplished by word of mouth and don't feel guilty for doing so. No one in their right mind will blame you for leaving a corrupt teacher.

Also, even good gurus can develop mental illness later in life. It's important to know when to disregard what even your guru has said.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:30 am
Posts: 1355
Ramon1920 wrote:
There are some shameless people playing guru pressuring naive strangers into taking vows and committing to them before the students even know if they're qualified. Once that student is on the hook they take full advantage of that student as a cult slave and limit their communication with others by making rules about seeing other teachers or their students.

I have no problem saying if you take vows from such a con artist there is no fault in leaving them and warning others about their cult. You will not go to Vajra hell for taking vows from a con artist because they could not have had Vajrayana vows to give if they collected students for their personal use. Inform people in the Vajrayana community around you of what's going on, a lot can be accomplished by word of mouth and don't feel guilty for doing so. No one in their right mind will blame you for leaving a corrupt teacher.

Also, even good gurus can develop mental illness later in life. It's important to know when to disregard what even your guru has said.
I've never seen it explicitly said anywhere, but my impression is that vows and pledges received from a samaya breaker is invalid since initiations are.

Since an abusive person would be breaking his vows every time he was abusive, any vows, pledges, or initiations he gives would be invalid.

_________________
Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.

-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra

"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."

-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Teacher & Root Guru
PostPosted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 1:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:57 am
Posts: 231
Konchog1 wrote:
Ramon1920 wrote:
There are some shameless people playing guru pressuring naive strangers into taking vows and committing to them before the students even know if they're qualified. Once that student is on the hook they take full advantage of that student as a cult slave and limit their communication with others by making rules about seeing other teachers or their students.

I have no problem saying if you take vows from such a con artist there is no fault in leaving them and warning others about their cult. You will not go to Vajra hell for taking vows from a con artist because they could not have had Vajrayana vows to give if they collected students for their personal use. Inform people in the Vajrayana community around you of what's going on, a lot can be accomplished by word of mouth and don't feel guilty for doing so. No one in their right mind will blame you for leaving a corrupt teacher.

Also, even good gurus can develop mental illness later in life. It's important to know when to disregard what even your guru has said.
I've never seen it explicitly said anywhere, but my impression is that vows and pledges received from a samaya breaker is invalid since initiations are.

Since an abusive person would be breaking his vows every time he was abusive, any vows, pledges, or initiations he gives would be invalid.


There are specific aspects to breaking vows, some abuse might not constitute a full break, others do. But in general an abusive teacher would have invalidated everything they claimed to offer to a student.

A student of course will be adverse to recognizing this because they've invested in receiving empowerments and vows. If their teacher is invalid that means they are invalid to some degree and a lot of time is wasted. I myself as a young man had to face this reality and have recovered from it due to my confidence in the Buddha and dedication to Bodhicitta, so it's possible to come out unscathed.

As a young man, I made vows with the first lama I met, but when he tried to give me the first empowerment I recognized I was not dealing with a mahasiddha he had convinced me he was. Later he made it clear he kept no vows at all, and still later I found out that the lineage head he claimed to be the heart son had broken ties with because of samaya breaches and to begin with only given him a few empowerments, the major of which he didn't even receive the entire empowerment. In the end I wasted a lot of time and money on the charlatan, but fortunately not long after contacting his supposed teacher he was crippled by a sudden illness that left him barely able to talk.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: quince, smcj and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group