Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
ronnewmexico wrote:
I would think at some level temple can not be such exclusive and only monastic setting to exclusion. I would think this is missing opportunity. I never actually see any chod practiced in the west
outside of temple or monastary.
ronnewmexico wrote:Thanks again
I know it was not intended to describe youir practice... but it inspires me to hear such talk of unconcern.
To attain enlightenment I really think a warriors approach is always required to a extent. The teacher buddha being born to the warrior cast and Pademesambhva being anything but meek and mild. We must really seemingly be willing to risk everything at some point which is what I thinkingly saw in those of historic tibet in the nonmonastic context of Chod.
So I am enheartened by your description., though inadvertant. Inspiring
ronnewmexico wrote:Expecting to see Chod practicioners of many sorts in remote areas and funeral grounds and places of spirits in the past....
Nangwa wrote:I think its important for us to be forthright without giving too much or anything that would be inappropriate.
In general I feel that the sangha jewel is the most underutilized of the three jewels in the context of western Buddhism.
I think we all have a lot that we can learn from one another that will help us on the path.
Luke wrote:ronnewmexico wrote:Expecting to see Chod practicioners of many sorts in remote areas and funeral grounds and places of spirits in the past....
I just wanted to mention that many countries of the world have experienced so many battles over the years that just about anywhere you step is a place where someone died. There isn't always the need to seek out a visible cemetary.Nangwa wrote:I think its important for us to be forthright without giving too much or anything that would be inappropriate.
In general I feel that the sangha jewel is the most underutilized of the three jewels in the context of western Buddhism.
I think we all have a lot that we can learn from one another that will help us on the path.
Wow. That's the best thing I've ever read on a Buddhist forum on the internet. You rock.
Dharmaswede wrote:Greetings,
It is a challenge for those who live densely populated areas. And perhaps many Westerners do not practice in nyentsa as often as in old Tibet, but who really knows? Lama Jinpa has written very interestingly about internet as nyentsa (http://www.machikcholing.com/ - scroll down to "The Haunted Internet"), where some people (Westerners presumambly) practice! But by the end of the day it does not really matter if people practice in nyentsa or not in my humble opinion - since everyone practice according to their own capacity and motivation. That is good enough. (I am not saying that it does not matter whether you practice in nyentsa or not, just that I don't see the point in judging others on that basis.)
It is an interesting point that there might be a third tradition emerging in the West. But there were also householders in old Tibet, that were neither wandering nor monastic - so maybe not something so new after all. While there certainly were distinct monastic and non-monastic traditions, there was also a spectrum between the two which an individual could move along during his or her life span.

catmoon wrote:Blow themselves up? Gee, I wonder what that would look like. What's the risk?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest