Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:48 am
Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Dear all,
Upon the attainment of Buddhahood, does subjectivity based on personal history cease? Do all Buddhas agree on everything since they realised the same truth?
Regards,
Gyaltsen Tashi
Upon the attainment of Buddhahood, does subjectivity based on personal history cease? Do all Buddhas agree on everything since they realised the same truth?
Regards,
Gyaltsen Tashi
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
You'd have to ask a Buddha to know that.Gyaltsen Tashi wrote:Dear all,
Upon the attainment of Buddhahood, does subjectivity based on personal history cease? Do all Buddhas agree on everything since they realised the same truth?
Regards,
Gyaltsen Tashi
But I think, ultimately this would be the case
although I would suggest it would be more accurate, rather than to say
since they realised the same truth
to say
since they realised the same nature of truth.
...and that not so much that subjectivity ceases,
but that the duality of subjective and objective is transcended,
because what is perceived (experienced)
objectively, or subjectively,
are seen as emptiness,
and that emptiness (sunyata)is the truth, and the nature of truth, that is realized.
.
.
.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Based on how Shakyamuni appears in the scriptures, he was not only aware of his life after his birth but also all the previous lives he lived. Apparently he did not cease to be a person.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
I think the opening post is asking an excellent question. Actually, there are two questions there.
Responding to the second question first actually resolves the first question as well.
You have to understand, this only how i see it. As we say in English, your mileage may vary.
To the second question i would say NO. Buddhas do not agree on everything. Yes, all Buddhas are Buddhas but they each have their own dharma.
Which of course leads to the first question, something I've been pondering myself. "Does subjectivity based on personal history cease?"
I would say NO to this as well. As long as we have a body, there will be personal history and subjectivity. Certainly we can learn to use this subjectivity for the relief of our own suffering and that of others but we can never be rid of it. Even if we were to become zombie-like, it would still arise in our minds. (I am thinking of some of the poems of Nyoshul Khen there).
Good questions.
Responding to the second question first actually resolves the first question as well.
You have to understand, this only how i see it. As we say in English, your mileage may vary.
To the second question i would say NO. Buddhas do not agree on everything. Yes, all Buddhas are Buddhas but they each have their own dharma.
Which of course leads to the first question, something I've been pondering myself. "Does subjectivity based on personal history cease?"
I would say NO to this as well. As long as we have a body, there will be personal history and subjectivity. Certainly we can learn to use this subjectivity for the relief of our own suffering and that of others but we can never be rid of it. Even if we were to become zombie-like, it would still arise in our minds. (I am thinking of some of the poems of Nyoshul Khen there).
Good questions.
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:48 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
If Buddhas disagree on a course of action, then what happens?
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
I do not think Buddhas can "disagree", but they can teach different things as skillful means.
Regarding subjectivity, I do not understand how exactly it is related to personal history.
Regarding subjectivity, I do not understand how exactly it is related to personal history.
Please consider donating to help find a cure for Degenerative Vitreous Syndrome:
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:48 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
A related question and something much more relevant to us, for those on the path as Buddhists, does our personal history matter as we are striving to attain non-duality and to let go of all our baggage? Should we forgo our subjective experiences and not cling to them? Do we have to work through out personal history to reach the Dharma? Or is Dharma something apart from our personal history?
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:48 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
We form subjective opinions based on our personal history.Nikolay wrote:
Regarding subjectivity, I do not understand how exactly it is related to personal history.
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
All good questions, GT.Gyaltsen Tashi wrote:A related question and something much more relevant to us, for those on the path as Buddhists, does our personal history matter as we are striving to attain non-duality and to let go of all our baggage? Should we forgo our subjective experiences and not cling to them? Do we have to work through out personal history to reach the Dharma? Or is Dharma something apart from our personal history?
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Ah, ok. I am more used to seeing this word used in meaning related to subject/object and such.Gyaltsen Tashi wrote: We form subjective opinions based on our personal history.
Please consider donating to help find a cure for Degenerative Vitreous Syndrome:
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
http://www.gofundme.com/floaters
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
End of self-interest, yes. End of subjective judgements, I would think so. But I think you have to be careful not to negate the personal altogether, otherwise it results simply in 'depersonalization'. I think the 'realised being' is 'the union of form of emptiness' and is the expression of tathata in every moment. And the concern of the mahayana is always with 'every sentient being' - and beings are subjects. So the 'end of subjectivity' is a rather unfortunate expression, I think.
How could it not? Without it, we wouldn't have anything to let go of.does our personal history matter as we are striving to attain non-duality and to let go of all our baggage?
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Exactly.Astus wrote:Apparently he did not cease to be a person.
Person, personality and Buddha Nature are aspects of being.
The enlightened Buddhas have a person, the physical and mental mantle.
They have a personality. The route through Dukkha to the far shore, will reflect in their expression and dharma.
They are as awake beings, the same in awareness and nature, to all enlightened persons, across time, space and religions. They are of the same essence and speak and act from the same nature of being.
If your teachers are not awake then subjectivity is all they can offer . . . that is why we need more Buddhas and less
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:48 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Does that mean I have to continue with my therapy first?jeeprs wrote:How could it not? Without it, we wouldn't have anything to let go of.does our personal history matter as we are striving to attain non-duality and to let go of all our baggage?
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
I think the answer is 'whatever it takes'. Besides no-one should take advice about whether or not to continue with therapy from an Internet forum.
Anyway, whatever exists for us - whatever 'comes up' - is there for a reason. I think the Buddhist approach can only be to learn to see it as it is without either rationalising it or denying it. That means being 'less subjective' in a sense, without denying the reality of your own existence.
Anyway, whatever exists for us - whatever 'comes up' - is there for a reason. I think the Buddhist approach can only be to learn to see it as it is without either rationalising it or denying it. That means being 'less subjective' in a sense, without denying the reality of your own existence.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Seems to me you are taking a personal question here and turning it into a theoretical one. Whatever "buddhas" may disagree about is between them. It is not a theoretical issue but an intensely specific one.Gyaltsen Tashi wrote:If Buddhas disagree on a course of action, then what happens?
One way to answer such a question, at a distance and without being involved, would be to say, "Who knows?"
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.
-
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Nicely put (with my emphasis!) - Fully realising sunyata (along with whatever else as relevant) would make them unlikely, one would think, to imagine that they *are* people at any meaningful level.lobster wrote:The enlightened Buddhas have a person
What this would mean for subjectivity is anyone's guess
you wore out your welcome with random precision {Pink Floyd}
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
"The enlightened Buddhas have a person, the physical and mental mantle"
You speak only about yourself,and not about Buddha.In tibetan practice where imagine yourself as an Buddha think that imagine the mental mantle or physical body?
You speak only about yourself,and not about Buddha.In tibetan practice where imagine yourself as an Buddha think that imagine the mental mantle or physical body?
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:48 am
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
Relevant?
Don't Take Your Life Personally [Paperback]
Ajahn Sumedho
http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Take-Your-Li ... 0946672318
Don't Take Your Life Personally [Paperback]
Ajahn Sumedho
http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Take-Your-Li ... 0946672318
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
"So, bhikkhus any kind of form whatever, whether past, future or presently arisen, whether gross or subtle, whether in oneself or external, whether inferior or superior, whether far or near, must with right understanding how it is, be regarded thus: 'This is not mine, this is not I, this is not myself.'MalaBeads wrote:
Which of course leads to the first question, something I've been pondering myself. "Does subjectivity based on personal history cease?"
I would say NO to this as well. As long as we have a body, there will be personal history and subjectivity.
Is it a mistake to think you have a body to begin with?
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!
Re: Is the attainment of Buddhahood the end of subjectivity?
No, its not a mistake to think you have a body but it might be a mistake to think you ARE that body and grasp onto whatever arises in that continuum, saying "This is me".seeker242 wrote:"So, bhikkhus any kind of form whatever, whether past, future or presently arisen, whether gross or subtle, whether in oneself or external, whether inferior or superior, whether far or near, must with right understanding how it is, be regarded thus: 'This is not mine, this is not I, this is not myself.'MalaBeads wrote:
Which of course leads to the first question, something I've been pondering myself. "Does subjectivity based on personal history cease?"
I would say NO to this as well. As long as we have a body, there will be personal history and subjectivity.
Is it a mistake to think you have a body to begin with?
Whatever arises is impermanent, including the body itself.
Awareness however can suffuse the body. But awareness is "not me" either. It's just awareness.
I am well aware of my idiocy. I am also very aware that you too are an idiot. Therein lies our mutuality.