Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Sat Dec 27, 2014 8:20 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
Will wrote:
Another excellent, simpler (but not simple) commentary, much earlier than Je Rinpoche's 'Ocean', is the Ornament of Reason by Mabja Bodhisattva. Snow Lion published it some time back.

http://www.shambhala.com/the-ornament-of-reason.html

Yes, the Ornament of Reason is the best early Tibetan commentary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
The earliest commentaries on the MMK by Indian authors (besides the Akutobhayā) are the following:

An Annotated Translation of the Chung-Lun With Nāgārjuna's Middle Stanzas Vol.1 by Brian Bocking.
An Annotated Translation of the Chung-Lun With Nāgārjuna's Middle Stanzas Vol.2 by Brian Bocking.
A Study of the Buddhapālita-Mūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti by Akira Saito.

:buddha1:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2297
I was just looking at an article by William L. Ames, and in one of the footnotes he says that the clearest introduction to Madhyamaka that he knows of is the translators’ introduction to this:
http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Middle-Way-Chandrakirtis-Madhyamakavatara/dp/1590300092
and that another excellent introduction to the basic ideas of Madhyamaka,
with an emphasis on their significance for the Buddhist path is this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sun-Wisdom-Teachings-Nagarjunas-Fundamental/dp/1570629994.
I haven't read either, but I thought I would pass that along, since he seems to be a pretty good scholar, whose thesis, btw, is here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/120037318/Bhavaviveka-s-Prajnapradipa-Six-Chapters-3-4-5-17-23-26.

_________________
Through Dzogchen we can really understand what God is and we don’t have to worry if there is a God or not. God always exists as our real nature, the base, for everybody. - Chögyal Namkhai Norbu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 4:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
From the Acknowledgments to Ames's thesis:

"This dissertation has no intrinsic nature of its own ..."

! ;-)

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 4:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:31 am
Posts: 1934
Location: Sydney AU
that's right! It is one of the implications of the 'emptiness of emptiness'. Nagarjuna says he has no thesis to defend. All he does is show how everyone else's theses basically contradict themselves. Whatever view you have is bound to be self-defeating in some respect.

Madhyamaka is an essentially skeptical philosophy. There are historical links between the ancient Greek Pyrrhonism - the original form of skepticism - and Madhyamaka - see for instance Flintof's Pyrrho and India, Adrian Kuzminski Pyrrhonism: How the Ancient Greeks Reinvented Buddhism and Jay Garfield's Epoche and Sunyata

_________________
Learn to do good, refrain from evil, purify the mind ~ this is the teaching of the Buddhas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2297
Also, "The Shape of Ancient Thought" by McEvilley.

_________________
Through Dzogchen we can really understand what God is and we don’t have to worry if there is a God or not. God always exists as our real nature, the base, for everybody. - Chögyal Namkhai Norbu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
jeeprs wrote:
Madhyamaka is an essentially skeptical philosophy. There are historical links between the ancient Greek Pyrrhonism - the original form of skepticism - and Madhyamaka - see for instance Flintof's Pyrrho and India, Adrian Kuzminski Pyrrhonism: How the Ancient Greeks Reinvented Buddhism and Jay Garfield's Epoche and Sunyata

There are differences. Pyrrhonian skeptics likely wouldn't accept karma and rebirth. Whereas mādhyamikas do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:31 am
Posts: 1934
Location: Sydney AU
Of course, I quite agree. One ought not to over-state the resemblances. But I always find it interesting to consider the meaning of 'skepticism' in regards to both the ancient Greek and Indian schools. Nowadays we think of 'skeptics' as being kind of anti-spiritual or at least basically 'naturalist' in their outlook. But a really deep skepticism is actually a sadhana. The same for the original 'cynics'. They too were basically like renunciates. But the meaning of 'cynic' has also changed over time.

Anyway, I know that it is tangential to the main thread. Take it as a footnote. :smile:

_________________
Learn to do good, refrain from evil, purify the mind ~ this is the teaching of the Buddhas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2297
Also, there is this:
http://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=102&t=8282#p99497

_________________
Through Dzogchen we can really understand what God is and we don’t have to worry if there is a God or not. God always exists as our real nature, the base, for everybody. - Chögyal Namkhai Norbu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 1596
Relative truth is an illusion, ultimate is free from any elaboration, thus there is no true existence in appearances.

_________________
Say what you think about me here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2297
jeeprs wrote:
But a really deep skepticism is actually a sadhana. The same for the original 'cynics'. They too were basically like renunciates. But the meaning of 'cynic' has also changed over time.

I know Trungpa is controversial, but maybe you will find this interesting:
http://chronicleproject.com/CTRlibrary/Cynicism_and_Warmth.html

_________________
Through Dzogchen we can really understand what God is and we don’t have to worry if there is a God or not. God always exists as our real nature, the base, for everybody. - Chögyal Namkhai Norbu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 9:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Posts: 5787
dzogchungpa wrote:
jeeprs wrote:
But a really deep skepticism is actually a sadhana. The same for the original 'cynics'. They too were basically like renunciates. But the meaning of 'cynic' has also changed over time.

I know Trungpa is controversial, but maybe you will find this interesting:
http://chronicleproject.com/CTRlibrary/Cynicism_and_Warmth.html


:good:

Trungpa wrote:
The whole approach here is that you have extremely adequate resources within yourself, whether you regard yourself as insane or sane. You have tremendous resources in any case. Whether you take advantage of your insanity or sanity is up to you.

_________________
Need help getting on retreat? Want to support others in practice? Pay the Dana for Dharma forum a visit...

viewtopic.php?f=114&t=13727


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:25 am
Posts: 231
Location: North Carolina
Tom wrote:

Just cracking this one open. Ordered Fri. and surprisingly received it earlier today, considering the pub. date is tomorrow!
Yep, It is beginning to look invaluable.
Shaun :namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group