Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
I have read many times that the word Zen comes from the Sanskrit word "dhyana" which means "meditation" or "samadhi," but Zen Buddhists generally don't care about different states of samadhi and are usually more concerned with non-thinking and non-meditation than they are with meditation.
So perhaps Zen should have been called something else instead! lol
Does anyone else find this ironic?
So perhaps Zen should have been called something else instead! lol
Does anyone else find this ironic?
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
There are many types of meditation, so what does meditation mean precisely? If you find the answer, you will be able to compare it with the teachings of Zen.
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Samadhi (Jp.: zanmai) is a term used often in Zen. It is used several ways:Luke wrote:.....Zen Buddhists generally don't care about different states of samadhi and are usually more concerned with non-thinking and non-meditation than they are with meditation.
Samadhi can refer to a state of meditative absorption in which dualistic habit and fixation is lessened.
Samadhi can refer to specific states that are expressions of deepening and integrating the recognition of one's nature, which are meticulously examined and cultivated within the course of Zen training. For example the Jewel Mirror Samadhi (hokkyo zanmai) and the alternate samadhis of hen and sho (hen sho ego zanmai).
Samadhi can refer to the fruition of Zen, which is Zenjo (Skt: Dhyana-samadhi) in which the recognition of kensho is the perfection of vipashyana, and the continual arising of that recognition in the midst of activity is the perfection of shamatha. These in union are Zenjo. It could also be described as the union of wisdom and means, essence and function, emptiness and compassion, Manjusri and Samantabhadra, actualization of the 4 wisdoms/3 bodies, etc.
Non-thinking or no-thought (munen) refers to a mind which functions freely without stopping or fixating. This is also called no-mind (mushin).
Non-meditation is the encompassing of all activity of body, speech and mind within meditation. That is, one is never not practicing.
What I wrote above reflects Rinzai common usage of these terms. Other traditions may have different or additional usages. What was your question?
~ Meido
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
"Non-meditation" is a kind of meditation. (How very Zen.) Seriously, meditation pursued long enough will eventually lead to samadhi and there are numerous examples of it in the biographies of Zen masters.
"It's as plain as the nose on your face!" Dottie Primrose
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Because the Western mind tends to be rather sensationalist, it is often looking for some kind of Wow! experience in relation to meditation. Like 'the world stood still'. I think that does happen, but it is rare. From my experience, which is not at all much, one can enter into some states of samadhi without actually noticing it. These states are very subtle, and sometimes they're beneath the threshold of conscious awareness. The most that ever happens in my case is sometimes a sense of real peace and quietude. But it often passes quickly as the monkey mind starts up again.
There is another point - this is that 'realization' and 'experience' are not the same. You can have experiences during meditation, but they tend to come and go. But realizations are deeper. That is when you really understand 'the way things are'. That might not even constitute an experience. Often there is no 'wow' factor, although sometimes there is. But the point about realizations is that they tend to be more stable and more significant than experiences as such.
In any case, Zen does emphasis the importance of sitting practice, no matter what kinds of experiences arise or don't arise.
There is another point - this is that 'realization' and 'experience' are not the same. You can have experiences during meditation, but they tend to come and go. But realizations are deeper. That is when you really understand 'the way things are'. That might not even constitute an experience. Often there is no 'wow' factor, although sometimes there is. But the point about realizations is that they tend to be more stable and more significant than experiences as such.
In any case, Zen does emphasis the importance of sitting practice, no matter what kinds of experiences arise or don't arise.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
If my memories are correct, the term "Zen school" appeared rather late, around the 11th century, when a group of people wanted to strengthen their position in the Chinese Buddhist scene against the "others", namely the "teaching schools". And by Zen they never meant actual meditation, but rather the inexpressible experience of the true nature (while the "teachings" are the expressed side).
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
And what is the difference between those two? There may be many methods and techniques, but isn't meditation an inexpressible experience of the true nature?Astus wrote:And by Zen they never meant actual meditation, but rather the inexpressible experience of the true nature.
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
The gradual path of meditation (going through preliminaries, shamatha and vipashyana) culminates in the direct realisation of the true nature. So what counts as meditation is not actually that realisation but the path toward it.oushi wrote:And what is the difference between those two? There may be many methods and techniques, but isn't meditation an inexpressible experience of the true nature?
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
From Bodhidharmas Bloodstream Sermon:Astus wrote:The gradual path of meditation (going through preliminaries, shamatha and vipashyana) culminates in the direct realisation of the true nature. So what counts as meditation is not actually that realisation but the path toward it.oushi wrote:And what is the difference between those two? There may be many methods and techniques, but isn't meditation an inexpressible experience of the true nature?
"Buddha is Sanskrit for what you call aware, miraculously aware. Responding, arching your brows blinking your eyes, moving your hands and feet, its all your miraculously aware nature. And this nature is the mind. And the mind is the Buddha. And the Buddha is the path. And the path is Zen. But the word Zen is one that remains a puzzle to both mortals and sages. Seeing your nature is Zen. Unless you see your nature, it’s not Zen."
What do you think about this?
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
It is a quote from a Zen text.oushi wrote:What do you think about this?
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Ok.Astus wrote:It is a quote from a Zen text.oushi wrote:What do you think about this?
What do you think Zen is, according to this Zen text?
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
A sudden path to realising the nature of mind. That is, not a gradual method that goes through stages, but simply the insight into emptiness.oushi wrote:What do you think Zen is, according to this Zen text?
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
- dzogchungpa
- Posts: 6333
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
I don't know how Zen it is, but it is certainly very Tibetan:Jinzang wrote:"Non-meditation" is a kind of meditation. (How very Zen.).
http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=nonmeditation
There is not only nothingness because there is always, and always can manifest. - Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Nice one from the recorded sayings of Joshu [Zhaozhou, 778–897], if I remember it correctly:
A monk asked, "What is meditation?"
The master replied, "Non-meditation."
The monk asked, "How can meditation be non-meditation?"
The master replied, "It's alive!"
~ Meido
A monk asked, "What is meditation?"
The master replied, "Non-meditation."
The monk asked, "How can meditation be non-meditation?"
The master replied, "It's alive!"
~ Meido
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Zen and nonmeditation are not meditation. Meditation is using the mind to concentrate on something. Your nature is beyond the mind.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Or rather there is nothing beyond mind. The true nature is no nature.Holybla wrote:Zen and nonmeditation are not meditation. Meditation is using the mind to concentrate on something. Your nature is beyond the mind.
"There is a koan that asks, "What is your original face before your parents were born?" One might naturally assume that there is some special thing called "original face," but that is not the right approach. When we open the hand of thought, letting go, the original self is already there. It's not some special mystical state. Don't seek it somewhere else. When we open the hand of thought, what is there, in that moment, is our original face."
(Kosho Uchiyama: Opening the Hand of Thought, p. 154)
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?
2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.
3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.
4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.
1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
When we open the hand of thought, letting go, the original self is already there. It's not some special mystical state
Thus shall ye think of all this fleeting world:
A star at dawn, a bubble in a stream;
A flash of lightning in a summer cloud,
A flickering lamp, a phantom, and a dream.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
Right. So why bother getting up before dawn to meditate or taking the trouble to study sutras? Surely just better to open the hand of thought and just go about your daily routine. After all there's nothing special to attain and no 'special state'.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
'Surely just better to open the hand of thought (opened) and just go (closed) about your daily routine. After all there's nothing special to attain and no 'special state'.'
For the 'opened hand of thoughts' there is no special state.
For the 'closed hand of thoughts', there is 'opened hand of thoughts' state.
So, it may be not difficult to open the hand, but to "make" it stay like this, is a different story.
For the 'opened hand of thoughts' there is no special state.
For the 'closed hand of thoughts', there is 'opened hand of thoughts' state.
Meditation constitutes of technique and meditative state (dhyana->Zen). Many techniques, one Zen. This meditative state is the highest meditation, as it transcends both doing and not doing, by not using the mind. In opened hand of thoughts, mind is not used, it acts. Before you can let it act, sometimes it is necessary to tame it (thus long practice of removing karma, taming the Ox). If it is wild, and you have no trust in it, you will close the hand of thoughts moment after opening it, like grasping reins.jeeprs wrote:So why bother getting up before dawn to meditate or taking the trouble to study sutras?
So, it may be not difficult to open the hand, but to "make" it stay like this, is a different story.
Say what you think about me here.
Re: Zen, dhyana, and non-meditation
And you know this how ?
“You don’t know it. You just know about it. That is not the same thing.”
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche to me.