Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Forum for discussion of Tibetan Buddhism. Questions specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 8493
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby DGA » Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:05 pm


User avatar
conebeckham
Posts: 4553
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby conebeckham » Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:39 pm

In other news, I've just trademarked the phrase "long periods of vacancy, repeated only occasionally."

So don't even try using it.


"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")

User avatar
heart
Posts: 3950
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby heart » Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:56 pm

"We are all here to help each other go through this thing, whatever it is."
~Kurt Vonnegut

"The principal practice is Guruyoga. But we need to understand that any secondary practice combined with Guruyoga becomes a principal practice." ChNNR (Teachings on Thun and Ganapuja)

Alfredo
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:52 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby Alfredo » Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:23 am

(no longer participating on this board)

User avatar
PadmaVonSamba
Posts: 2870
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby PadmaVonSamba » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:29 am

Attachments
10x10a.jpg
I want a donut.
10x10a.jpg (7.91 KiB) Viewed 3231 times
Profile Picture: "The Foaming Monk"
The Chinese characters are Fo (buddha) and Ming (bright). The image is of a student of Buddhism, who, imagining himself to be a monk, and not understanding the true meaning of the words takes the sound of the words literally. Likewise, People on web forums sometime seem to be foaming at the mouth.
Original painting by P.Volker /used by permission.

User avatar
randomseb
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:12 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby randomseb » Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:24 am

The act of doing so shows that this group has nothing worthwhile to teach and no one worth being taught by. They obviously don't engage in much thinking either :shrug:

User avatar
PadmaVonSamba
Posts: 2870
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby PadmaVonSamba » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:23 pm

Profile Picture: "The Foaming Monk"
The Chinese characters are Fo (buddha) and Ming (bright). The image is of a student of Buddhism, who, imagining himself to be a monk, and not understanding the true meaning of the words takes the sound of the words literally. Likewise, People on web forums sometime seem to be foaming at the mouth.
Original painting by P.Volker /used by permission.

User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 14670
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby Grigoris » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:19 pm

"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde

DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 8493
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby DGA » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:46 pm


Alfredo
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:52 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby Alfredo » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:05 am

(no longer participating on this board)

Kyogan
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:20 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby Kyogan » Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:11 am

I think Alfredo is probably right to make the distinction about the 'trademarking of slogans'. Actually, neither Tulku Urgyen, Tsoknyi Rinpoche nor any of the other Tibetan Lamas who already used and published the words "short moments many times" in their books in the years before O'Denver trademarked it, actually used it as a Trademark, but really more as a ''slogan'' as part of their teaching and method.
But it's probably also as a ''slogan'' that could distinguish 'her own' unique teaching method, that is why she wants to own it.

But from what i've heard of the reports of threats and intimidation she or her org has made against people whom she considers are, or may be, using the ''concepts and techniques'' that she's copyrighted, her principle intent seems to be to intimidate people who are not sure of the legalities, or who feel they couldn't afford to pay for a court case anyway.

I think it's true that Candice O'Denver would have very little chance to actually win a court case against other teachers or writers, even though she could, and does, threaten to legally attack them for "using her intellectual property" or "any products, concepts or techniques that she considers are similar to or in competition with" the many concepts and techniques that she's directly lifted from Dzogchen sources.

Firstly, because so many of the basic perspectives and concepts and techniques she claims as ''hers'' have been obviously lifted from Tibetan sources that are widely available to others as well. Therefore those original sources that she cribbed from have undoubtedly influenced how various other western (not to mention traditional Tibetan) teachers communicate many of the same basic ideas. So she could never effectively prove that an idea/concept that anyone else used and that included aspects derived from the traditional perspectives and expressions were actually derived from hers, because hers are provably derived from the same earlier tradition.

[ In the last year or three, O'Denver has been faced with considerable criticism from several well informed Dzogchen teachers and students who've directly confronted her with detailed proof of her plagiarism. She tries to deny it by claiming these are all from a kind of 'anonymous open source' domain, but she has since then made considerable effort to modify her earlier expressions by simply replacing the very obvious and unique Dzogchen terminology for most of her basic concepts, and dress them up with terms derived from computer systems, virtual reality, transhumanism, etc.
For example, she now seems to have re-worded her earlier book "The Basic State" (which was a transparently obvious rehash of many basic Dzogchen ideas, tho presented as her own world first breakthrough discovery!) in a kind of techno-lingo form, and renamed it "The Singularity of Virtual Reality". It doesn't look good, but it does help disguise her sources a little. ]

Secondly, she'd never actually risk an open court case, most especially one she'd have almost no chance of winning, because of the terrible publicity it would bring to her highly contrived reputation as a perfect teacher who possesses ''unerring clarity at all times'', and only does all she does "for the benefit of all" (another term she's trademarked also). Her main method seems to be to keep her power plays and threats in the shadows, so that she can still uphold the surface image of someone who practices her own teachings and "does not manipulate points of view but relies on the View, and lets everything be as it is".

So altho i doubt she would ever win, or even mount, litigation against other teachers, the very fact that she's set herself up to appear to be able to do so, and has already been known to threaten to do so, is one of the many signs of significant disfunction in her own personality, and in her business model, and very tightly controlled organization. imo.

And, this despite the fact that she now boasts that, for the very first time ever, she alone has discovered "the algorithm" that is "The Standardized Solution to the Nature of Mind" and which will provide permanent mental and emotional stability to all who pledge lifelong devotion and service to her and her organization, which is of course the only way guaranteed to lead to permanent well-being! Can this be anything more than the narcissistic grandiosity of an unbridled ego?

She and her senior devotees often claim that total reliance on the methods of their organization will lead to complete liberation,and 24/7 mental and emotional stability, wisdom powers of great benefit and so on. And yet, apart from their repeated assertions there isn't much in O'Denver's behavior itself that attests to this. The many significant contradictions between her optimistic hyperbole and her own behavior (especially her covert behavior, behind the scenes, or using pseudonyms to criticize others, or via her lawyer, all attest to the fact that she can't walk her own talk..

And after encountering the literally control-freak level of micro-management with which she totally dominates (almost puppeteer's) the speech and behavior of her inner circle of devotees (in order to assure that the "Standardized Solution" remains standardized), her frequent claims that her org is a ''worldwide grassroots movement'' without the type of top-down control so common in the past, is simply laughable. As is the claim she's made to audiences at her talks on several occasions, that she now has "millions of followers in hundreds of countries'' utilizing her methods and living in reliance on her "Four Mainstays".

Anyway, it almost doesn't matter, in a way. She seems to be just another one of the many clever New-Age charlatans, who've dressed up some second hand Tibetan teachings to help launch her career as an impostor-Guru selling another partial self-help method as the ultimate truth. Such characters will always be circling around the edges of the herds trying to lure neophytes into their own exclusive little flock.

Alfredo
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:52 am

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby Alfredo » Thu Apr 11, 2013 6:32 am

What kind of "threats and intimidation" are we talking about here? Cease and desist letters? I would like to see the precise language of her complaints. The law can't help you if you won't stand up to her.

"Techniques" cannot be copyrighted or trademarked, only patented (and then only if you invented them). "Concepts" cannot be protected at all.

This is going to sound really obscure, but I promise you it's relevant: U.S. religion scholar David C. Lane has documented numerous instances of plagiarism by Eckankar leaders, who lifted material from Sant Mat literature (they're both on Wikipedia if you really want to know what these are), but changed the proper names of the Masters who supposedly revealed the material. Lane's expose did attract legal threats (he was just a university student at the time), but he persevered, and Eckankar started losing members. Your best allies, besides lawyers, are journalists and religious-studies scholars. There should be critical blogs, ex-member discussion forums, and You-Tube videos. Make it harder for her to attract money.

If it's any comfort, a trademark re-enters the public domain after a period of inactivity--in the USA I believe this is ten years. I doubt that this woman's activity has enough appeal to last very long, though she may succeed in ruining the marks for anyone else (like the swastika).
(no longer participating on this board)

Dharmaswede
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:22 pm

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby Dharmaswede » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:11 pm

It is quite sad really. I have met practioners of great sincerety and capacity, unlike myself, who buy in to this. If you are not familiar with dzogchen, well then it sounds... great.

User avatar
monktastic
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:48 am
Location: NYC

Re: Iconic Phrase 'SHORT MOMENTS, MANY TIMES' Copyrighted?

Postby monktastic » Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:41 pm

This undistracted state of ordinary mind
Is the meditation.
One will understand it in due course.

--Gampopa


Return to “Tibetan Buddhism”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests