Buddhism is peaceful?

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:43 pm

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:47 pm

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

michaelb
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:04 pm

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby michaelb » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:48 pm

Last edited by michaelb on Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:54 pm

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

User avatar
conebeckham
Posts: 4553
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby conebeckham » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:17 pm

Hey Caz, how can you reconcile your quote form LPYH with the letter MichaelB posted?


Reading through Phabongka's text, I've come across something about giving up Nyingma yidams when one practices Geluk yidams....he uses the example of Khyungpo Naljor, who first practiced Bon, then Nyingma, etc.....I'm still parsing it out.....back of folio 11, if anyone's interested....


"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")

User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 14670
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Grigoris » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:25 pm

"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde

User avatar
Konchog1
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:30 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Konchog1 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:04 am

Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.

-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra

"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."

-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:18 am

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:21 am

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

JKhedrup
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:28 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby JKhedrup » Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:47 am

If it was a private letter it would be odd for his students ton include it in his Sungbum/collected works.

Caz there are many books for learning Tibetan available. The first step is to learn the alphabet. Learntibetan.net has good resources for this. Then you have to decide if you are interested in modern spoken or classical written Tibetan. For texts the latter is what you need. There are too many books to mention but I like Geshe Sopa's Lectures in Tibetan religious culture, it is written with some colloquial mixed in but the second half is all about the Gelug Lam Rim. Also, all the essential terminology is presented in each chapter.

I really encourage you to try to get even a basic reading level, then you can use the Translation tool and Illuminator to piece together sentences yourself. Through practice, year byyear, it will get easier. Investing an hour a day is enough to get to the point of being able to punch things into the dictionary relatively quickly.

Do this while you are still young. And if anyone discourages you, maybe they just don't want you to know something they don't know. Knowledge empowers you to make your own opinions and if they disagree with mine that is fine. I just want you to have the tools to explore those opinions fully. My only agenda is to encourage you to learn :namaste:

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:03 pm

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

User avatar
conebeckham
Posts: 4553
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby conebeckham » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:51 pm



"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:45 pm

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

User avatar
conebeckham
Posts: 4553
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby conebeckham » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:51 pm

So, is there anything that could possibly be in any of Phabongkha's writings that would lead you to believe that he was sectarian, short of explicit instructions to others to actually destroy monasteries, or worse? Or are these "polemics" as you term them merely specific instructions, skillful means geared towards individuals only?


"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")

Caz
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Caz » Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:07 pm

Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

Liberation in the Palm of your hand~Kyabje Pabongkha Rinpoche.

DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 8493
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby DGA » Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:12 pm


User avatar
conebeckham
Posts: 4553
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby conebeckham » Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:31 pm



"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")

michaelb
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:04 pm

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby michaelb » Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:41 pm

indeed, Cone. Any discussion on this issue is pointless, unless we use it as way of reflecting on our own responses to things that challenge us. When people identify themselves strongly with a position so that any contradiction of that position is seen as a personal attack, debate becomes pointless. There is no answer to blind faith. I will bail out here, too.

Before I do, I will post a translation of a couple of Pabongkha's letters to Lui Chuntang, so people at least understand a little why non-Gelugpas draw such exception to Pabongkha. As for the incidents of destroying Guru Rinpoche statues, Nyingma artifacts and forcibly convertiing Nyingma gompas in Chamdo and Kham, there are many accounts that predate any of the current difficult issues that the Gelug tradition has had to go through. Even Phabongkha wouldn't have been stupid enough to actually write it down.

"A CASE TO STUDY
By Tenzin Ragyal

The office of
His Holiness the Dalai Lama
Dharamsala, H.P. INDIA
[...]
With regard to Phabongkha's primary motivation, his outlook towards
other religious traditions and his objectives for starting this
movement, they are all clearly inscribed in a letter that he sent to
the then Chinese military general Lui Chun Tang of the Sichuan
province of China. This letter could be found on page 451, 456 in
the "Cha" section of Phabongkha's volumes on "Miscellaneous Works".
For your convenience I have attached here copies of that letter in
its English translation. If you study them you will be able to
understand the core of the matter without any further explanations.
It is in everybody's interest to take a strong and appropriate stand
and not to remain indifferent on the activities of Phabongkha's
followers and their cult groups and leaders like, e.g. NKT leader
Geshe (self-styled) Kelsang Gyatso in England, Serkong Thritrul in
Taiwan, Gangchen Lama in Italy, Drakgom Tulku in Nepal, Dema Gonsar
in Tibet, Gonsar Rin-poche in Swiss and Dorjee Shugden Society in
India and Nepal etc.

The primary objective in providing this information is not to dig
out what has happened in the past. It is to draw attention to the
fact that even today, in this period of global religious harmony,
some short-sighted and narrow-minded people and groups are actively
adopting the path of fanaticism and religious intolerance. It is a
task and responsibility of all of us to strongly discourage and act
against such forms of religious intolerance and fanaticism.

Tenzin Ragyal
Dharamsala, H.P. INDIA

1) A letter (Phabongkha) sent to the Chinese General, Lu Chu Tang in the Earth Tibet Year

In these days most of the Emperors and kings misperceive the
barbaric religion as the best religion and have turned their backs
against the nectar of the Buddha's teaching and opened the gate wide
towards the lower realm for themselves and as well as their
subjects. At such a time as a great leader and also because of your
strong prayers and merits, you have respected only Manjughosh
Tsongkhapa's teaching lineage, which is the core of the Buddha's
teachings, and put it on the crown of your head and held it firm at
your heart. You have thus spread and propagated the unsullied
teaching in many provinces in-cluding your own and have sown the
seed of the path of liberation. I am grateful to you and the more I
reflect the more my mind is flooded with rejoice and admiration like
the waves of oceans touching the sky. Thank you very much.
Still on this earth many other faiths like Hinduism, Christianity,
Islam, Kongtse, (Confucianism ), Bon (ancient native Tibetan
religion) etc. flourish and each of them claims their own system as
the best. However, except in the teaching of the Buddha, all the
others do not have the path to liberation. They do not even have
the potential to abandon even one type of afflictive emotions.
Even if they practice and uphold their faith in great hardship for a
long time, it will simply open the gate of the lower realm and no
positive result will be achieved at all from them. It is only a
deceptive word showing what is not a path as a path.

Contrarily in the case of the Buddha's teaching, it easily bestows
the "State of Liberation and Omniscience", closes the door of
rebirth in samsara and lower realms and it is possible to eradicate
completely the 84,000 classes of afflictive emotions and their
propensities. In this teaching, without requiring much hardship,
one can travel from a peaceful path to a peaceful fruit. Since this
true teaching is always non-deceptive we should endeavour to make
our life meaningful from a long term perspective and follow only the
teaching of the Buddha. Although this teaching has four tenets, it
is only the Prasangika Madhyamika which realises the unmistaken
emptiness, which is free from the abyss of permanence and nihilism,
and which is the ultimate and exact intention of the Buddha.

Although in the land of Tibet there are many different tenets like
that of Nyingma, Kugyu, Sakya, Gelugpa and so forth it is only the
Gelug School which establishes the unmistaken view of emptiness and
the Prasangika Madhyamika system which is the philosophy of
Nagarjuna. It is not only the philosophical view but also in terms
of meditation it is the perfect meditation devoid of laxity and
torpor. As for its behaviour it is again pure as it is practiced in
accordance with the vinaya teachings. Thus it is only the Gelug
School which knows how to adopt the three: the view, the meditation,
the behaviour and in fact the complete teaching of the Buddha as one
integrated practice in the form of the stages of the path to
enlightenment. Thus this system of teaching of Tsongkhapa is the
heart essence of the Buddha's teaching and is therefore like a
pinnacle of the victorious banner. As such to uphold this teaching
by oneself and to disseminate it to others is the best and far-
reaching Boddhisattva way of practice. As a great leader you have
done the best to spread this teaching in the province of China just
as you have done in the past. And also in the regions of Kham you
have restored and further developed the teachings through various
means. I will be grateful for your continuous noble Boddhisattva
conduct of upholding the responsibility of the Gelug School.


1. Again a letter is sent to Lu Chu Tang in the Earth Rabbit
Year

Honest expression of the General presentation of Inner and Outer
Tenets of the World.

In general there are many religions in this world. Every follower
thinks that his own faith is the best. However, if we honestly
examine, Christianity and Islam are barbarism and therefore are the
worst and there is no other religion worse than these. The non-
Buddhist systems like that of Kapila and Sankhya are slightly better
than the aforementioned faiths but they do not have the path to
liberation. They may undertake great hardships like self-immolation
and jumping upon a trident but there is no path to liberation. It
opens the gate to the lower realm. The so-called Bonpo is also not
at all different from the other non-Buddhist faiths. Far from
achieving liberation it opens the door of the lower realm. Since
Confucianism is also not the teaching of the Buddha it simply gives
temporary happiness but not liberation. As all these systems are
opposite to the Buddha's teachings, leave aside achieving
Buddhahood, they do not at all have the path to liberation. One
cannot show even a single example of one who has achieved liberation
after having practiced these faiths. Without exception most of them
fall into the unfathomable lower realms. It is only Buddhism which
is the path of liberation. Even in Buddhism, the compassionate
Buddha Shakyamuni knew that if the profound and ultimate truth of
emptiness is taught right at the outset, it would not be understood
by the followers. Just as children are gradually taught, starting
from the alphabet, in the same way at first easily understandable
teachings are taught. Therefore he first taught the Vaibhashika
Tenet System which explains grosser meanings of selflessness of
persons. After that he taught the Sautantrika Tenet System which is
more profound than the previous one. Then he taught the Mind Only
School, which is again more profound and which teaches the grosser
selflessness of phenomena. It is this school which Thangsen Lama
propagated in China. After that he taught the Madhyamika Tenet
System which explains the subtle selflessness, the ultimate view.
Here also we have Indian Acharya/Masters Bhavaviveka;
Shantarakshita, who even though they have entered the Madhyamika
philosophy could not fathom the meaning of very subtle emptiness,
the ultimate intention of the Buddha. Thus they are mid-dling
Madhyamikas and they are known as the Svatantrika Madhyamikas.

And we also have Indian Acharyas like Buddhapalita and Chandrakirti
who had unmistakenly fathomed and realised the ultimate intention of
the Buddha, which was trail-blazed by Nagarjuna, and they are called
Prasangika Madhyamikas. Regarding the path of liberation and
Buddhahood, there are two parts: wisdom and method. All those tenet
systems below the Svatantrikas have found the unmistaken path of the
method but have failed to realise the ultimate view which is the wis-
dom aspect, and therefore they have not realised the ultimate
emptiness but just a facsimile. Hence it is only the Prasangika
Madhyamika System which realises the unmistaken subtle emptiness,
the ultimate thought of the Buddha.

There is not even a single individual who has realised the subtle
emp-tiness without entering into the Prasangika System. In the
absence of this realisation it is not possible to attain
enlightenment. Therefore this Prasangika Madhyamika System, the
system of Nagarjuna and Chandrakirti is the best, the supreme and
the peak among the four Buddhist Tenet Systems. In Tibet there are
many systems of Buddhist teachings like Nyingma, Kagyu, Sakya,
Jonang, Bodong and others. All these are Buddhist teachings and
they all have wonderful methods of accumulation of merits,
purification of obstructions, meditation on deities and recitation
of mantras. Through these practices one can achieve liberation.
Therefore these are a hundred thousand million times better than
Christianity, Islam and other non-Buddhist teachings. However,
there is no system like that of Tsongkhapa's, which is complete,
unmistaken, profound and fast.

Although each of the Tibetan philosophical schools feel and assert
that their own philosophy is that of Nagarjuna and Chandrakirti and
thus the philosophy of Prasangika, but, because of its very subtlety
the followers could not realise the main intention of their
preceding learned scholar practitioners and have thus erred. Most
of them have become like the philosophy of Hvashang Mahayana. By
becoming so one will fall into nihilism and will become the cause
for hell. Therefore, in Tibet, except Tsongkhapa's philosophy, all
others are mistaken. As such I can affirm that at present on this
earth and be-neath the sky it is only the refined gold, like
Manjushri Tsongkhapa's system which is alone totally faultless in
every aspect, be it the philosophical view, the meditation or the
conduct. It is complete, profound and extensive and if one has the
knowledge and the ability to practice this teaching properly then
one will be able to attain Buddha-hood within twelve human years or
even in three years and three fortnights. This can be sustained
through thousands of reasonings and references. The core of the
teaching is the path to enlightenment alone. While this wonderful
philosophy is existent many unfortunately adhere strongly to
inferior teachings. Many such people are there in Tibet as well,
which is a clear indication of lack of merit. The establishment of
Tsongkhapa's teaching, the core of the Buddha's teachings, in your
country is such a rare priviledge that even tens and hundreds of
millions of merits accumulated by Lord Indra and Brahma cannot equal
even a portion of this merit. This is really fortunate.


Abandoning Dharma is, in the final analysis, disparaging the Hinayana because of the Mahayana; favoring the Hinayana on account of the Mahayana; playing off sutra against tantra; playing off the four classes of the tantras against each other; favoring one of the Tibetan schools—the Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu, or Nyingma—and disparaging the rest; and so on. In other words, we abandon Dharma any time we favor our own tenets and disparage the rest.

User avatar
Konchog1
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:30 am

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby Konchog1 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:47 pm

This new translation is missing the comment about non-Gelug sects going to hell. Hmm.
Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.

-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra

"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."

-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats

michaelb
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:04 pm

Re: Buddhism is peaceful?

Postby michaelb » Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:53 pm

I think they're different letters. I would have to look at the originals... but I can't be arsed.

One more quote from one of pabongkha's letters, included in Dhongthog Rinpoche's book, "A timely tongue of flame."

"Presently, aside from Manjughosha Tsongkhapa's view; the views of all Sa.skya.pa , bKa'.rgyud and rNying.mas are erroneous. What need to mention the consequentialist madhyamaka view, without even an autonomist [madhyamaka] or mind only view, [they] meditate a strictly annihilationist view similar with non-Buddhist extremists [mu.stegs.pa ] and Hashang Mahaayaana. If an annihilationist view is held, a result apart from going to Avici hell is not warranted. Also by not recognizing subtle sinking, meditation will be faulty...because liberation and the non-erroneous path of omniscience will not exist for them; for such as they, although saadhana is practiced for a thousand years, realization will not arise; similar with wishing for butter having churned water, the essence does not exist". [T.G Dhongthog Rinpoche "Dus.kyi.me.lce, Timely Tongue of Flame", pp. 117-118, Delhi: 1979]


Return to “Gelug”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests