Philosophy and Schools

General forum on the teachings of all schools of Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. Topics specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vidyaraja
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:48 am

Philosophy and Schools

Post by Vidyaraja »

Can someone either explain to me or point me in the direction of a source to understand more about the differences between the various philosophical traditions within Mahayana (say Yogacara vs Madhyamaka) and which schools they are associated with? For example, in my recent readings on Shingon I came to understand the influence of the Kegon or Hua-yen philosophy on Shingon, and from what I understand they emphasize this over Madhyamaka, which the Tibetans favor. As I understand it Zen is influenced more by Yogacara and Hua-yen to some degree as well. Perhaps this is a superficial or incorrect understanding of the matter, and if so for that I apologize.

What I would like to know, really, are the primary/basic differences between the major schools of Buddhist philosophy and with which schools/sutras (or groups of sutras) they may be associated with. I'd also be interested in understanding which schools of philosophy are most different from each other or whether there are any true incompatibilities that exist between any (or are they all Buddhist and therefore mostly equivalent?)

Thanks in advance
Huseng
Former staff member
Posts: 6336
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm

Re: Philosophy and Schools

Post by Huseng »

In East Asia there are two primary divisions of Buddhist philosophy: Yogācāra ("phenomenal characteristics" 法相) and Madhyamaka/Sanlun (the "emptiness nature" 空性). The latter is especially understood via Kumārajīva and Jizang.

There are plenty of works and papers on Yogācāra and Madhyamaka philosophies, though you might consider first reading basic Abhidharma texts like the first chapter of the Abhidharmasamuccaya by Asanga or the relevant parts of the Abhidharma-kośa by Vasubandhu. All latter schools draw on and perhaps refute Abhidharma ideas. I believe to really understand the latter philosophy you need to be thoroughly familiar with Abhidharma. That's why before you read on these subjects just read Vasubandhu and Asanga.
Michael_Dorfman
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:09 pm

Re: Philosophy and Schools

Post by Michael_Dorfman »

[quote="Vidyaraja"
What I would like to know, really, are the primary/basic differences between the major schools of Buddhist philosophy and with which schools/sutras (or groups of sutras) they may be associated with. I'd also be interested in understanding which schools of philosophy are most different from each other or whether there are any true incompatibilities that exist between any (or are they all Buddhist and therefore mostly equivalent?)

Thanks in advance[/quote]

If you're comfortable reading academic literature, I'd recommend Paul Williams's book Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, which offers a basic overview of the territory.
User avatar
Wayfarer
Former staff member
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:31 am
Location: AU

Re: Philosophy and Schools

Post by Wayfarer »

I still think that T R V Murti's The Central Philosophy of Buddhism is a good book. It has been criticised by subsequent scholars but my Buddhist studies tutor last year still recommended it. Of course it is nothing like studying all the original sources but it does provide an outline of how the various historical developments unfolded. Have a look at the comments on Amazon.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
User avatar
Karma Dondrup Tashi
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm

Re: Philosophy and Schools

Post by Karma Dondrup Tashi »

Nice basic intro from POV of Tibetan practitioner:

Image
It has been the misfortune (not, as these gentlemen think it, the glory) of this age that everything is to be discussed. Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France.
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6965
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Philosophy and Schools

Post by kirtu »

Hua-yen has apparently survived in Japan (Kegon) and Korea. The Avatamsaka Sutra is the touchstone for the Hua-yen school.

I am surprised to see Huseng recommend study of the Abhidharma as a starting point on this topic. He has also made comments on the Hua-yen schools in the past. Perhaps some material is on his website.

While the Tibetan traditions also incorporate teachings from the Avatamsaka Sutra they do not seem to have admitted the view of the deep interpenetration of reality that is the hallmark of Hua-yen philosophy. Why this is so is not clear.

Kirt
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche

"Most all-knowing Mañjuśrī, ...
Please illuminate the radiant wisdom spirit
Of my precious Buddha nature."
HH Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
Post Reply

Return to “Mahāyāna Buddhism”