YOU CANNOT POST. OUR WEB HOSTING COMPANY DECIDED TO MOVE THE SERVER TO ANOTHER LOCATION. IN THE MEANTIME, YOU CAN VIEW THIS VERSION WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW POSTING AND WILL NOT SAVE ANYTHING YOU DO ONCE THE OTHER SERVER GOES ONLINE.

1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition - Page 3 - Dhamma Wheel

1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Casual discussion amongst spiritual friends.
Nori
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:42 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Nori » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:23 am


User avatar
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby daverupa » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:30 am


User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18442
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Ben » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:31 am

I'm sorry, Nori, but that is my honest assessment.
And frankly, I find it offensive.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

(Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • •

e: [email protected]..

Nori
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:42 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Nori » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:46 am


User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18442
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Ben » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:59 am

Nori what I think you should do is apply the same sort of skeptical inquiry into the claims and assertions of these 9/11 denialists and see what you come up with. Follow the evidence.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

(Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • •

e: [email protected]..

User avatar
robertk
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby robertk » Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:12 am

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
Thinking of you Nori.

chownah
Posts: 6161
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby chownah » Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:46 am


User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 3012
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Dan74 » Sat Oct 15, 2011 8:26 am

As a non-specialist (I am a mathematician) my thoughts are that there isn't much research done that involves bringing gigantic towers down either by crashing into them with airplanes or blowing them up. The forces involved would be very complex and hard to model or predict scientifically.
_/|\_

chownah
Posts: 6161
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby chownah » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:11 am


Jhana4
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:20 pm
Location: U.S.A., Northeast

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Jhana4 » Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:43 pm

In reading the scriptures, there are two kinds of mistakes:
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.

User avatar
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby daverupa » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:42 pm


User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23012
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby tiltbillings » Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:00 pm


Nori
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:42 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Nori » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:47 pm


User avatar
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby daverupa » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:06 pm

Why aren't we inclined to note that other engineers disagree, engineers who have the same credentials?

How many engineers are there (in the United States, for example), these days, anyway?
Last edited by daverupa on Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23012
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby tiltbillings » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:07 pm


User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 4346
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Kim OHara » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:22 pm


chownah
Posts: 6161
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby chownah » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:55 am

Nori,
It seems that the website is mostly saying that when looking at pictures and videos of the collapse of building WTC7 what is seen is how it might look if the building was intentionally demolished using explosives. It could very well be true that the collapse looked just like a collapse brought on by intentional demolition......but.....however......it is entirely possible that a building could collapse in this fashion by an internal fire which weakens the support structures and then causes collapse...or at least that is what it seems that the experts who actually studied the evidence in detail have concluded.

It's sort of like if you somehow burn the back of your hand with a fire and someone comes along and says, "that reddened skin on the back of your hand looks like an allergic reaction to some toxic dust." It could very well be that a burn from a fire could look the same as an inflammation from toxic dust......it could very well be that a building which collapses from a fire could look the same as a building which collapses from intentional demolition.....

chownah

Nori
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:42 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Nori » Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:25 am


User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23012
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby tiltbillings » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:51 am


User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 3012
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm

Re: 1500 Architects & Eng. say WTC7 was controlled Demolition

Postby Dan74 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:35 am

_/|\_


Return to “Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine