Chinese conceptions of "soul" vs. Buddhist terminology

Forum for discussion of East Asian Buddhism. Questions specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
tingdzin
Posts: 583
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:19 am

Chinese conceptions of "soul" vs. Buddhist terminology

Postby tingdzin » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:32 am

Can any academically-oriented students of Chinese Buddhism point me to studies on how Chinese Buddhism adopted previously-existing terminology dealing with "souls" (hun?) or other concepts of post-death existence, after the introduction of Buddhism? In particular, is there any pre-Buddhist terminology that was incorporated into Chinese translations of Indic words such as vijnana?

User avatar
Huifeng
Posts: 1476
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am

Re: Chinese conceptions of "soul" vs. Buddhist terminology

Postby Huifeng » Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:50 am

tingdzin wrote:Can any academically-oriented students of Chinese Buddhism point me to studies on how Chinese Buddhism adopted previously-existing terminology dealing with "souls" (hun?) or other concepts of post-death existence, after the introduction of Buddhism? In particular, is there any pre-Buddhist terminology that was incorporated into Chinese translations of Indic words such as vijnana?


Maybe "How Buddhism Acquired a Soul on the Way to China", circa pp. 185ff.
http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Acquired ... 1845539974
check out 魂hun, 魄po, 靈ling, 精jing, 神shen, 識shi, etc. ...

Haven't read it, but has been recommended.

Also, the classic Chinese text, the Hongmingji has some discussion on this, the "soul doesn't perish theory" 神不滅論, that sort of thing.

~~ Huifeng

tingdzin
Posts: 583
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:19 am

Re: Chinese conceptions of "soul" vs. Buddhist terminology

Postby tingdzin » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:53 am

Thanks a lot -- seems exactly what I'm looking for


Return to “East Asian Buddhism”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests