Huifeng wrote:I recall a discussion ...
Astus wrote:To give my personal favourites: Jeff Shore, Anzan Hoshin and Shohaku Okumura (who is Japanese but has a community in Indiana and speaks English).
dzogchungpa wrote:@Jikan
http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/mistake
http://tinyurl.com/d8wekdn
If you think 'mistake' or '**ck up' are the right words to use here, fine. I don't think so.
Jikan wrote: So no, I don't think "mistake" is adequate (although the OED definition is more adequate than the yahoo definition you cite). There is no "right word."
Jikan wrote:jeeprs wrote: Furthermore the quality and standard of debate on ZFI is just as good as on this forum.
By what criteria? I'd like to know so DW can learn from the successes of others.
jeeprs wrote:The editorial in the Spring 2013 edition of Tricycle discusses the Joshu Sasaki matter (may require subscription).
Nonin Chowaney wrote:shikantazen wrote:Eastern Spiritual practices recommend celibacy or at least some sexual restraint. They say that if you lose your sexual energy (semen) frequently (more than once/twice every week), it could affect your progress in meditation.
Does Zen have such a thing? Is sexual restraint required to make progress?
No.
Hands palm-to-palm
jeeprs wrote:Jikan wrote:jeeprs wrote: Furthermore the quality and standard of debate on ZFI is just as good as on this forum.
By what criteria? I'd like to know so DW can learn from the successes of others.
It's well moderated, threads generally stay on topic, the tone is generally civil, and there are several contributors with expert knowledge of East Asian Buddhism, who take the time to write detailed posts, as well as a number of Zen teachers who contribute. When I was enrolled in Buddhist studies, I posted a few questions about scholarly topics and got very useful advice on where to look for information.
Both these forums (i.e. ZFI and Dharmawheel) are very good in my view, I learn a lot from them and enjoy interacting with others who are knowledgeable about the subject.
Astus wrote:... the disciples are guilty of being ignorants.
dzogchungpa wrote:Astus wrote:... the disciples are guilty of being ignorants.
http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/guilty
dzogchungpa wrote:@Astus Your post seemed to imply that there is a kind of symmetry as far as guilt or blame is concerned between the teacher and his disciples in this case.
Is that what you meant?
Astus wrote:dzogchungpa wrote:@Astus Your post seemed to imply that there is a kind of symmetry as far as guilt or blame is concerned between the teacher and his disciples in this case.
Is that what you meant?
That was my intention, yes. Although we can say that the teacher is the one who misbehaved and took advantage of his students, the students were also at fault in neglecting the study of the Dharma.
dzogchungpa wrote:I can certainly agree with that. I guess 'guilty' just sounded somewhat harsh to my ear. However, I do feel that Sasaki's fault is really of a different order of magnitude than that of the women he abused.
shel wrote:That's not what they teach in "American Zen" however. This was posted yesterday at Zen Forum International:Nonin Chowaney wrote:shikantazen wrote:Eastern Spiritual practices recommend celibacy or at least some sexual restraint. They say that if you lose your sexual energy (semen) frequently (more than once/twice every week), it could affect your progress in meditation.
Does Zen have such a thing? Is sexual restraint required to make progress?
No.
Hands palm-to-palm
The signature line for Nonin reads:
Soto Zen Buddhist Priest. Transmitted Dharma Heir of Dainin Katagiri Roshi.
Abbot and Head Teacher, Nebraska Zen Center / Heartland Temple, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
It's well know that Dainin Katagiri Roshi also slept with students while married, so Nonin's views are not surprising.
Dan74 wrote:You've really outdone yourself this time, shel!
C'mon!
The context was controlling emissions of semen and restraint in the sense of a yogi, not misconduct.
And just because Katagiri's affair was revealed after his death, does not mean that Nonin condones such things. It may in fact make him more sensitive and exercise greater restraint.
in your pursuit of be critical at all costs, you seem to have abandoned any pretense to objectivity, my friend.
You also seem to be a bit loose with the facts - which moderators are from Treeleaf? Kojip is a ex-moderator who joined Trealeaf some time after resigning as a mod. And who else were you thinking of?
Look, ZFI is not perfect, but you go over the top with your comments. Had you been more objective, I think people would have more time for your comments which are not completely without merit, IMO. As it stands you are getting more and more ignored around here.

shel wrote:Dan wrote:You also seem to be a bit loose with the facts - which moderators are from Treeleaf? Kojip is a ex-moderator who joined Trealeaf some time after resigning as a mod. And who else were you thinking of?
Pedestrian.Look, ZFI is not perfect, but you go over the top with your comments. Had you been more objective, I think people would have more time for your comments which are not completely without merit, IMO. As it stands you are getting more and more ignored around here.
I trust you've heard the expression about the kettle calling the pot black. At least we'll have each other after all others forsake us.
Dan74 wrote:Pedestrian is a student of James Ford (http://zenforuminternational.org/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=9265&p=142776#p142759) and
how I would categorize your response above... you can do better.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests