Pete Mcr wrote:I'm new to Buddhism, have read some secondary texts and now interested in reading the original sutras. Can anyone recommend which versions/collections of sutras are most helpful to begin studying?
I'm considering getting this http://www.amazon.co.uk/Awakening-Heart-Essential-Buddhist-Commentaries/dp/1937006115/ref=sr_1_28?ie=UTF8&qid=1360508159&sr=8-28 ...not sure if there are any better collections.
And is there a link summarising the content of each sutra (other than wikipedia)?
Pete Mcr wrote:I'm new to Buddhism, have read some secondary texts and now interested in reading the original sutras.
Pete Mcr wrote:I'm new to Buddhism, have read some secondary texts and now interested in reading the original sutras. Can anyone recommend which versions/collections of sutras are most helpful to begin studying?

Pete Mcr wrote:I'm considering getting this http://www.amazon.co.uk/Awakening-Heart-Essential-Buddhist-Commentaries/dp/1937006115/ref=sr_1_28?ie=UTF8&qid=1360508159&sr=8-28 ...
Asoka1944 wrote:Pete, advice is cheap, so here is mine: Don't overburden yourself with sutras. Pick one or two and study them, by which I mean, read them often, ponder them, read commentaries. It's the same with schools of Buddhism: We can get real confused trying to navigate through all of them. Perhaps look over one sutra from the Theravada and one from the Mahayana to see which resonates with you more. It's all well and good to say that all schools are ultimately the same or lead to the same place, but trying to walk all those paths at once could stretch your legs beyond repair.
with Metta,
Michael
(Buddharūci)
PorkChop wrote:If you want simple life lessons to read through literally, go with any of the Pali Sutta Pitaka.
If you want deep philosophical treaties with lots of metaphor that will fundamentally change the way you view the world, go with the Mahayana Sutras (the ones you picked are good examples).
chickenman wrote: highly recommend his "heart of the buddha's teaching'.
Pete Mcr wrote:PorkChop wrote:If you want simple life lessons to read through literally, go with any of the Pali Sutta Pitaka.
If you want deep philosophical treaties with lots of metaphor that will fundamentally change the way you view the world, go with the Mahayana Sutras (the ones you picked are good examples).
Both? Most of my books are manuals, mostly for work but also self-help/health/lucid dreaming/languages etc so this is probably my default...Asked what books Ive enjoyed learning most from and come back to again and again, it'd be the dense confusing poetic ones that made no sense at first!
PorkChop wrote:There are deep parts to the Pali Suttas, certainly if there were no Pali Suttas (or their respective source tradition), then would've been no Mahayana Sutras.
But Mahayana Sutras are the kind that are really good about taking on all kinds of new meanings with repeated readings.
Mahayana Sutras really need to be meditated on.
Going to steal an idea from Queequeg here: similar to how Star Wars uses all kinds of far out sci fi imagery as a vehicle for timeless truths, the same goes for Mahayana Sutras.
Just wanted to throw that out there in case you wanted to know the relative value of either tradition; there are many who diss the Mahayana because they get caught up on the imagery and miss the message.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests