shel wrote:To a [dysfunctional] fault.
you said it, not me!

shel wrote:To a [dysfunctional] fault.

shel wrote:Getty back to the topic, I saw an interesting couple of articles published at Sweepingzen.com this week which I believe touch on the core issue of the Treeleaf controversy. The core issue is apparently that online sangha cannot be a substitute for in-person sangha, and I believe the articles posted by Jundo and Taigu demonstrate why. It can't be a substitute because with online communication we tend show an artificial version of ourselves. Indeed, one of the articles is literally titled "Unmasking" ( http://sweepingzen.com/sit-a-long-with-taigu-unmasking/ ). In the video Taigu mentions how his response to recent events in his life caused a big stir in at Treeleaf. It would appear that he is not well known at Treeleaf. Only the online mask is known. Granted it's possible to present a mask in person, and indeed we probably all do to some degree, but by being around others in person we see infinitely more. We see reactions to the unexpected, everything, unfiltered. Online everything is measured and controlled, and any random elements are removed, so we show only what we want to show.
Any thoughts?
AlanI wrote:shel wrote:Getty back to the topic, I saw an interesting couple of articles published at Sweepingzen.com this week which I believe touch on the core issue of the Treeleaf controversy. The core issue is apparently that online sangha cannot be a substitute for in-person sangha, and I believe the articles posted by Jundo and Taigu demonstrate why. It can't be a substitute because with online communication we tend show an artificial version of ourselves. Indeed, one of the articles is literally titled "Unmasking" ( http://sweepingzen.com/sit-a-long-with-taigu-unmasking/ ). In the video Taigu mentions how his response to recent events in his life caused a big stir in at Treeleaf. It would appear that he is not well known at Treeleaf. Only the online mask is known. Granted it's possible to present a mask in person, and indeed we probably all do to some degree, but by being around others in person we see infinitely more. We see reactions to the unexpected, everything, unfiltered. Online everything is measured and controlled, and any random elements are removed, so we show only what we want to show.
Any thoughts?
Very interesting, Shel, However, that is not the message of that talk by Taigu at all. In fact, it is the complete opposite.
lived with some of the people with Katagiri Roshi for many years.
Treeleaf is my first online experience with a Buddhist community, and I have to say it is one of the warmest, most connected, helpful groups I have ever associated with. I am rather quiet, but when I do need some question, Taigu and Jundo and the others in the community have been there. Over the last couple of years I have found the practice there very real, and Taigu and Jundo very powerful and down to earth teachers.
Maybe that honesty and down to earth is what is confusing you, Shel.
shel wrote:Getty back to the topic, I saw an interesting couple of articles published at Sweepingzen.com this week which I believe touch on the core issue of the Treeleaf controversy. The core issue is apparently that online sangha cannot be a substitute for in-person sangha
shel wrote: I was talking about the big stir that was caused in the Treeleaf community when they learned more about Taigu's real life. Like I said, it's like no one really knows him there, and that's not a surprise being that they only know him through the filter of digital technology, where everything that's show is controlled and measured. Little, if anything, unexpected happens through that media channel.
You confuse me, Shel. Someone PM'd me to say that you are the fellow who <SNIP> I am just trying to figure out your very exaggerated reactions.
seeker242 wrote:shel wrote:Getty back to the topic, I saw an interesting couple of articles published at Sweepingzen.com this week which I believe touch on the core issue of the Treeleaf controversy. The core issue is apparently that online sangha cannot be a substitute for in-person sangha
I have a friend who attends Treeleaf and finds it very beneficial. He does not believe that an online sangha can be an equivalent of an in person sangha. But he does believe that an online sangha is better than no sangha at all. I would imagine that it would be quite difficult to argue that an online sangha is not better than no sangha at all.
AlanI wrote:shel wrote: I was talking about the big stir that was caused in the Treeleaf community when they learned more about Taigu's real life. Like I said, it's like no one really knows him there, and that's not a surprise being that they only know him through the filter of digital technology, where everything that's show is controlled and measured. Little, if anything, unexpected happens through that media channel.
Shel, I am confused about what "big stir"? Taigu is talking about feeling stress on his job, and he talks about how we tend to idealize Buddhist Teachers as being perfect. He uses as an example Trungpa who felt fear and deep depression in his biography. This did not create any stir. Look for yourself at the very positive reaction from the Tree leaf members.
You confuse me, Shel. Someone PM'd me to say that you are the fellow who was asked to leave Treeleaf by a vote of the whole Sangha because of creating a problem, and maybe this is why you have an axe to grind against Taigu and Jundo? I am just trying to figure out your very exaggerated reactions.
http://www.treeleaf.org/forums/showthre ... ION-PRAXIS
shel wrote:I think this may be what Jikan was basically getting at with the recent topic about shopping for a tradition. Giving people what they want rather than what they need. Can anyone at Treeleaf live up to the hype that Omoi Otoshi wrote and "stop trying to fight what life throws at you and instead accept your circumstances and adapt to them, dance with them, effortlessly, fluidly.” I think that we can possibly appear that way online, through the filter of digital technology, showing only what we want to show.
Omoi Otoshi wrote:No, I believe we all stumble and fall, every day. I don't believe any of us are saints all the time.
Every moment is a "Buddha moment".Omoi Otoshi wrote:What I described in my previous post was a Buddha moment. In between those, there are many sentient being moments!
gregkavarnos wrote:Every moment is a "Buddha moment".Omoi Otoshi wrote:What I described in my previous post was a Buddha moment. In between those, there are many sentient being moments!
shel wrote:Hello Omoi Otoshi,Omoi Otoshi wrote:No, I believe we all stumble and fall, every day. I don't believe any of us are saints all the time.
Yes, obviously, the point I'm making is that with online communication life is controlled and measured so "all the time" may be filtered, and we show only what we want to show. Even when we stumble, as in the case of Taigu's breakdown, it is put on show to derive some much desired meaning out of it.
shel wrote:Hello Omoi Otoshi,Omoi Otoshi wrote:No, I believe we all stumble and fall, every day. I don't believe any of us are saints all the time.
Yes, obviously, the point I'm making is that with online communication life is controlled and measured so "all the time" may be filtered, and we show only what we want to show. Even when we stumble, as in the case of Taigu's breakdown, it is put on show to derive some much desired meaning out of it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests