Human Need.

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
Locked
DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 9466
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Human Need.

Post by DGA »

If you were asked to explain the Mahayana view (or at least "a" Mahayana view) of human need, or even better a general theory of need for all sentient beings, where would you begin? What texts would you look to?

It's relatively straightforward to describe the ultimate needs of beings, which would have to do with enlightenment.

But what about provisional needs, for food, shelter, and water, but also further up Maslow's pyramid?

This would be a useful thing to be able to explain to people who want to know just how one can be useful to the totality others in an everyday way, as in engaged Buddhism in particular.

Thoughts?
User avatar
kirtu
Former staff member
Posts: 6997
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Human Need.

Post by kirtu »

Haven't taken a look at Maslow in a while but the Mahayana (as well as the Theravada) is dedicated to both the temporal and ultimate happiness of all beings. The SGI and other groups (often Nichiren but not just by any means) chanting for prosperity and well-being in this life is totally valid as an example. Then in many cases Buddhist masters devoted a great deal of time to physically improving the environment of other people.

Kirt
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”

"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 9466
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: Human Need.

Post by DGA »

kirtu wrote:Haven't taken a look at Maslow in a while but the Mahayana (as well as the Theravada) is dedicated to both the temporal and ultimate happiness of all beings. The SGI and other groups (often Nichiren but not just by any means) chanting for prosperity and well-being in this life is totally valid as an example. Then in many cases Buddhist masters devoted a great deal of time to physically improving the environment of other people.

Kirt
This is a good place to start. But how does one describe what those needs might be, and in a given situation, decide which needs get met? Given the choice and with scarce resources, do you guild the Buddha statue or do you educate your daughters--which is more meritorious?
palchi
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:26 pm

Re: Human Need.

Post by palchi »

Jikan wrote:
This is a good place to start. But how does one describe what those needs might be, and in a given situation, decide which needs get met? Given the choice and with scarce resources, do you guild the Buddha statue or do you educate your daughters--which is more meritorious?
You educate your daughters - and your sons. If you have children, ensuring that they are able to develop to their full potential is your first responsibility. Everything else follows from there... And if your children are educated they in turn have a chance to use their education for the benefit of sentient beings... It's not only children's need, it's their right!
Ngawang Drolma
Founding Member
Posts: 2230
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:44 pm

Re: Human Need.

Post by Ngawang Drolma »

Jikan wrote:If you were asked to explain the Mahayana view (or at least "a" Mahayana view) of human need, or even better a general theory of need for all sentient beings, where would you begin? What texts would you look to?

It's relatively straightforward to describe the ultimate needs of beings, which would have to do with enlightenment.

But what about provisional needs, for food, shelter, and water, but also further up Maslow's pyramid?

This would be a useful thing to be able to explain to people who want to know just how one can be useful to the totality others in an everyday way, as in engaged Buddhism in particular.

Thoughts?
The first thought that comes to mind for me, given the question, is that Maslow's theory covers human needs and the suffering that can be incurred when the most basic needs aren't met (leading up to higher needs). Likewise, Mahayana Buddhism recognizes the suffering that humans endure and offers medicine for this ailment. In this instance Maslow and Mahayana Buddhism are quite in synch in that there's a recognition of suffering and a quest to end it.

Children are marvelous dharma practice and for many people, the centerpiece of practice. Our children give us the opportunity to practice patience, compassion, selflessness, and if we extend the feelings we have towards our own children outward, towards all beings, we can strive to develop bodhicitta.

So in short, current psychological theories are frequently in synch with Buddhism as I humbly understand it. When His Holiness the Dalai Lama was asked to define Buddhism, his answer was, "Common sense." I don't have a reference handy but can locate it if need be.

This is my very humble opinion, to be taken with a grain of salt. May all beings be free of suffering and the causes of suffering /\

Kindly,
Laura
User avatar
Huifeng
Posts: 1477
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am

Re: Human Need.

Post by Huifeng »

I always considered that the word "need" or "necessity" needed some sort of qualification, eg. "one needs XXX in order to YYY". This is because some have the default qualification of "in order to live / survive", but others have other criteria. Helps to make these explicit. This would also work with a Buddhist (particularly Mahayana) model, based on various this worldly, other worldly, liberative, or universally liberative goals.
User avatar
Lazy_eye
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:32 am
Location: Laurel, MD
Contact:

Re: Human Need.

Post by Lazy_eye »

Jikan wrote:[ how does one describe what those needs might be, and in a given situation, decide which needs get met? Given the choice and with scarce resources, do you guild the Buddha statue or do you educate your daughters--which is more meritorious?
Wonder if it might be worth looking at two contemporary, and contrasting, examples of "dharma in action" -- namely, the Maitreya Project and Tzu Chi. What are the strengths (and shortcomings, if any) of each? In what way does each reflect Mahayana doctrine, or some subset within Mahayana practice, such as engaged Buddhism?

Just looking at it superficially, the Maitreya Project seems to have been conceived with a "hierarchy of needs" in mind. It's expected to help the local economy and will include education and health facilities, but of course the most striking aspect of it will be the 500-foot Buddha statue. So the emphasis is ultimately more on the transcendent. The possible shortcomings of this approach have been a subject of public debate -- there is a controversy over land acquisition and displaced farmers -- but I can see the doctrinal foundations for it in, for instance, Book 11 of the Avatamsaka Sutra (the section titled "Purifying Practices" in the Cleary translation).

I'm more partial, myself, to what Tzu Chi is doing but it's interesting to consider the merits of both.
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Human Need.

Post by Astus »

I think the reply could be the five desires: drink-food, sleep, sex, fame, wealth.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
Locked

Return to “Dharma in Everyday Life”