Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
It's not a lie; I don't even think it's deceptive. If she needed the food more than you did, and she was not offended, I actually think you did good.futerko wrote:How did she react afterwards?
I once went to a fish release. However when we arrived at the docks there were no fish to buy. The Lama with us (Thubten Nima) said we had generated the same amount of beneficial karma regardless, as we had had the intention to purchase and free fish.wisdom wrote:However immediately a thought occurred to me that maybe I had done something really bad by rejecting her offering, and I felt really bad for not taking it. In theory, although I am not any kind of great practitioner, lama or Guru, I aspire to be a better practitioner and have taken Bodhisattva vows and so forth. On some level I wondered if rejecting her offering had eliminated a potential cause for her to accumulate good karma and merit since she was making an offering to a Buddhist (even if she didn't know it), and my main concern is that I might have done just this.
So my question is this: Should we always accept offerings from people even if we know they need it more than us simply to allow them to generate karma and merit? Since she does not know I am a Buddhist and her intention was simply to return kindness, was any harm actually done by my rejecting it? I know if I could go back in time I would accept it, simply based on my immediate reaction and awareness of how I might negatively affect someones ability to generate sources of merit and good karma. At the same time her intention was the same either way, it was a completely selfless gesture made by someone who had nothing in order to return kindness to a complete stranger who obviously didn't need it and on that level I can see how she still generated good karma and merit.
That is assuming that she was giving without any conception of the giver, recipient, or the act of giving. It is quite possible that she was doing it because of the conventions about gifting - the idea that we shouldn't just take without offering something in return, which is based on karmic notions of self and pride - so in challenging that it may well have resulted in a reduction of karma, which is preferable to an accumulation of merit.5heaps wrote:her karma of giving would only become complete had you accepted the gift
losing 1 coupon this life and gaining 100 in a future life vs gaining 1 now and none later. hmmm. well at least there is still a large effect from positive motiviation
futerko wrote:That is assuming that she was giving without any conception of the giver, recipient, or the act of giving. It is quite possible that she was doing it because of the conventions about gifting - the idea that we shouldn't just take without offering something in return, which is based on karmic notions of self and pride - so in challenging that it may well have resulted in a reduction of karma, which is preferable to an accumulation of merit.5heaps wrote:her karma of giving would only become complete had you accepted the gift
losing 1 coupon this life and gaining 100 in a future life vs gaining 1 now and none later. hmmm. well at least there is still a large effect from positive motivation
This is exactly what I mean - such a gap is the space where the possibility of insight can arise.wisdom wrote:She was trying to close some kind of gap or debt that she perceived existed.