Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 5:32 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
gingercatni wrote:
heres an article http://buddhism.about.com/od/vajrayanab ... tra101.htm that discusses this issue. It states that these buddhas are not believed in.

As a pureland buddhist i believe in the buddhas, why would the buddha speak about them if they are made up? could this view just be part of the reformation that became vajrayana buddhism? distinguishing it from mahayana? there are other people on the net that have similar views to the article, i posted it as it best described what i've been trying to explain here.


Buddhism isn't a one single view kind of religion on the metaphysical and philosophical side I am afraid. In Vajrayana there are many differences in the way how to approach the Buddha's, for many different people with different inclination. It is no small matter unfortunately. I am still not sure what bothers you?

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:09 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Belfast Northern Ireland
heart wrote:
gingercatni wrote:
heres an article http://buddhism.about.com/od/vajrayanab ... tra101.htm that discusses this issue. It states that these buddhas are not believed in.

As a pureland buddhist i believe in the buddhas, why would the buddha speak about them if they are made up? could this view just be part of the reformation that became vajrayana buddhism? distinguishing it from mahayana? there are other people on the net that have similar views to the article, i posted it as it best described what i've been trying to explain here.


Buddhism isn't a one single view kind of religion on the metaphysical and philosophical side I am afraid. In Vajrayana there are many differences in the way how to approach the Buddha's, for many different people with different inclination. It is no small matter unfortunately. I am still not sure what bothers you?

/magnus


What bothers me is one school believes the buddhas are real enlightened beings reigning over their buddha fields, whereas vajrayana see's them as aspects of the buddha and not real at all, it sort of invalidates my practice.....probably not explaining myself well...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
gingercatni wrote:
What bothers me is one school believes the buddhas are real enlightened beings reigning over their buddha fields, whereas vajrayana see's them as aspects of the buddha and not real at all, it sort of invalidates my practice.....probably not explaining myself well...


I can assure you Vajrayana practitioners believe that Buddhas are real enlightened beings that might or not manifest a Buddha field. Vajrayana do also teach the methods to become such a Buddha within one life. No need to feel that Vajrayana invalidates your practice, just keep an open mind and realize that there are so many different valid practices within Buddhism.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 6:32 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Posts: 2995
Location: British Columbia
I'm having trouble getting a grip on the archetypical Buddha concept. Does it differ from the idea of a primordial Buddha?

_________________
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 7:21 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Olympia WA
My advice is to try to let go a bit of labeling things as real and unreal. I know it's really tempting, it is the culture some of us were raised in. I think though that the...flavor of the kind of real and unreal you are grabbing at just doesn't fit, you wont answer the questions through anything but your practice, using your conceptual mind to ask questions affirming or negating the reality of Buddhas just won't get you anywhere.

From my little learning in Vajrayana so far..they are not believed to be "made up", but they are not existent entities exactly either, the Chenrezig/Avalokiteshvara teachings emphasize the emptiness of the deities appearance. Again, not something we can ascertain the truth of through words I think.

That has been my experience at any rate.

So here's your question:

How is something that is an aspect of one of the three bodies not existing? How is an aspect of Buddha not existing?

_________________
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull" -Tom Waits


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 am
Posts: 998
Location: North Queensland, Australia
catmoon wrote:
I'm having trouble getting a grip on the archetypical Buddha concept. Does it differ from the idea of a primordial Buddha?

Hi, catmoon,
Just for people like you, me and the others having some difficulty being sure about the phrase, I did a Google search on ["archetypal Buddha" tibetan buddhism].
I got only 1400 results, which tells me it's not all that common :thinking: and a quick look at the snippets on the results page tells me that it is not always used the same way :thinking: but I haven't got time to take it any further ... over to you :tongue:

:namaste:
Kim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Archetypal Buddha?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
catmoon wrote:
I'm having trouble getting a grip on the archetypical Buddha concept. Does it differ from the idea of a primordial Buddha?


The OP is talking about yidams actually. But Buddha's such as Samanthabadhra, Vajradhara, Vajrasattva and the heads of the five Buddha families are what is sometimes referred to as archetypical Buddha's. But this archetypical is a Jungian idea.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group