How smart do you have to be to get it?

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
User avatar
seeker242
Posts: 2092
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Location: South Florida, USA

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by seeker242 »

It depends on what exactly you mean by "smart". "Low IQ" just isn't a good enough definition to answer the question. If you have two people with an IQ of 80 and one thinks it's ok to kill other living beings and the other person refrains from doing that because it's unethical, the second person would be smarter than the first. Even though they have the same IQ. The first person is not smart enough to get it, while the second person might be.
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!
User avatar
relay
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:22 am
Location: New York, US

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by relay »

What is meant by "get it?"
Is it something abstract or is it simplistic?
Is it a matter of analyzing or a matter of acceptance?
How much of the practice involves intellectual activity? Not on a personal level where someone's tendencies are just that, but in the broader general sense.
I think that there is a certain level of focus (ability to follow instruction) needed which may be the first step towards "getting it" and where that is not possible and therefore guidance is not possible, there may be a limit. But, unless we are giving the "getting it" a value or a goal (apex), then we are simply discussing a process which is different for all based on many variables and factors. In fact, I think there may be those who, while not very functional in a social sense and without any premonition or cognizance, already got "it"... look at a child's eyes when she first sees the ocean or a mountain. Sadly, most of get smart build our own mountains and go about loosing "it."

“For things to reveal themselves to us, we need to be ready to abandon our views about them.”
~ Thich Nhat Hanh

peace,
gabe
"We do not have to be ashamed of what we are. As sentient beings we have wonderful backgrounds. These backgrounds may not be particularly enlightened or peaceful or intelligent. Nevertheless, we have soil good enough to cultivate; we can plant anything in it.”
~Chögyam Trungpa
undefineable
Posts: 799
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by undefineable »

ground wrote:How does a statement hold anything?
Astus wrote:I don't know what depths you refer to.
I wasn't using the words I've highlighted metaphorically, let alone literally. {I kinda regret 'coming out' autistic on this forum :thinking: } - I was just making use of the conventions of language.
ground wrote:Consciousness grasps itself.
Or not - in the case of enlightened beings? :thinking:
ground wrote:The conceiver and the conceived ... one or two? Subjectively and objectively ... one or two? :sage:
One, I guess - I only intuit that 'answer' somewhere in the gaps between conscious thoughts. I trust it won't be exactly the same for an enlightened being, and that's before we even start saying 'not neither one nor two' etc. etc..
Astus wrote:The will for enlightenment usually comes from understanding suffering and its causes.
Well yeah; the central underlying cause and theme of suffering seems to be the idea that everything must refer back to some 'thing' called 'me'. Having gathered that much on reflection (rather than by calculation, lol), the will to 'be free of self' can appear-?? :?
you wore out your welcome with random precision {Pink Floyd}
Azidonis
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:04 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Azidonis »

The RInpoche's video is a good one. "Don't look too far."

There are some who believe that logic, reason, and science are pathways to enlightenment. They don't realize that they are only reinforcing their frameworks.

Enlightenment is not part of any framework, nor can it be contained within a framework. Seeking to reinforce the frameworks only serves to reinforce the frameworks.

Seeking within, and eventually being released from the need from the frameworks, is part of the true path, in my opinion.
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Grigoris »

Azidonis wrote:There are some who believe that logic, reason, and science are pathways to enlightenment.
Of course they are. Where has the Buddha taught anything to the contrary?
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Azidonis
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:04 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Azidonis »

gregkavarnos wrote:
Azidonis wrote:There are some who believe that logic, reason, and science are pathways to enlightenment.
Of course they are. Where has the Buddha taught anything to the contrary?
:namaste:
They are useful, but as this thread shows, not necessary. The local village bumpkin can awaken just like the university man with the PhD.

Edit: I should have written, "There are some who believe that logic, reason, and science are [the only] pathways to enlightenment." Sorry for the lack of clarity.
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Grigoris »

Well now, [with the addition] I will have to agree with you 100%! :smile:
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Azidonis
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:04 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Azidonis »

gregkavarnos wrote:Well now, [with the addition] I will have to agree with you 100%! :smile:
:namaste:
Apologies again. :)
pemachophel
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:19 pm
Location: Lafayette, CO

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by pemachophel »

Yudron

"I can't remember where I read it, but it is sometimes said in Mahayoga that the long complicated sadhanas are for people of the lowest capacity, those who are intellectuals and need something to think about."

Just a couple of weeks ago, Tsewang Sithar Rinpoche agreed that the long, complicated sadhanas are for those with less capacity and that shorter, more condensed sadhanas are for those with high capacity. However, His definition of capacity was somewhat different. My understanding of what He said was that, the more advanced a practitioner, the more practiced and skillful and the easier and quicker it is to do the visualizations. He didn't say anything about intellectuals. My guess is that He would take it as a given that those who are more practiced have less of a monkey mind through that practice. I don't see this as in any way a contradiction to what you said but an amplification/alternate POV.

:namaste:
Pema Chophel པདྨ་ཆོས་འཕེལ
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Grigoris »

Normally you do the long version until you "get" it and then switch to the short version to "maintain" it.

A good doctor, for example, does not need to read the entire microbiology manual every time they have to deal with an infection. They just go straight to the heart of the matter.
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
User avatar
Konchog1
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:30 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Konchog1 »

I read this today. It's somewhat relevant to this thread.
Do not use your own incapacity as a reason to repudiate what you cannot actually engage in or turn away from. Rather, think with anticipation, "When will I practice these teachings by actually doing what should be done and turning away from what should not be done?" Work at the causes for such practice--accumulating the collections, clearing away obscurations, and making aspirational prayers. Before long your mental power will become greater and greater, and you will be able to practice all of the teachings that you were previously unable to practice.

-Lam Rim Chen Mo eng v01 pg 49 tib pg 15
Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.

-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra

"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."

-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats
User avatar
windsweptliberty
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:36 pm

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by windsweptliberty »

Yes! :heart:
User avatar
Sara H
Posts: 575
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:51 pm
Location: On Hiatus from Dharmawheel.

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Sara H »

zenkarma wrote:How smart do you have to be to be enlightened? Can even a stupid person of low iq get it, and is it easier or harder for them?
Also i read about the different "capacites" of different people. Do people of higher capacity need extra help? Because reading various buddhist bulletin boards, it seems that the ones that talk the most about capacity have the more complicated practices.
You don't have to be smart at all.

Enlightenment is not dependent upon education, or intellectual capacity.

all you have to do is make a practice to sit still, withdraw within, and reflect upon yourself. (And staring at a wall helps. ; )

The Buddha used a Boddhi tree, but a wall works too.
Take refuge in the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha.
If you do regular practice, Enlightenment will sooner or later happen naturally on it's own.

In Gassho,

Sara H
Observing your mind is a good idea.
muni
Posts: 5559
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by muni »

When I come full of excitement with a new delivery of clevernesses, is the teaching I recieve: I have no clevernesses to say. :oops:

No wisdom ever "come" from ego/ dual habits.
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Grigoris »

Sara H wrote:... and reflect upon yourself.
Which self exactly does one reflect upon? ;)
:namaste:
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Azidonis
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:04 am

Re: How smart do you have to be to get it?

Post by Azidonis »

gregkavarnos wrote:
Sara H wrote:... and reflect upon yourself.
Which self exactly does one reflect upon? ;)
:namaste:
Exactly! It's like holding a mirror up to a mirror, and saying, "Oh my, so many reflections! So many things I can be! So many things I am!"

When the mirror breaks, what is behind it?
Post Reply

Return to “Dharma in Everyday Life”