Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
conebeckham wrote:Caz-
I think the word "Politics" can mean many things....in it's purest form, it describes the relations between persons or groups of persons, though we use it these days to mean, mainly, the practice or profession of governance of nations.
I think that politics is inevitable in religion, because "religion" is an institution and all human institutions are comprised of people and their relations. Not only that, but politics can also be said to deal specifically with power and authority, control. It takes no imagination to understand the relevance of "politics" of this sort, in any institutionalized religion. In simplest form, the Guru/Disciple relationship can be said to be a political one.
In fact, the creation of "new" organizations, from bifurcations or differences of doctrine, belief, or practice, is a political maneuver. You should know, and understand, this, in your own organization.
Having said that, I'm a firm believer in the Seperation of Church and State, both here in the US, and as an ideal throughout the world, and I am happy, and guardedly optimistic, to see Tibetans In Exile move away from a quasi-feudal "Dharma-cracy" to a representative Democracy. Nonetheless, political forces will continue to operate in the institutions of Tibetan religions, just as they do in all institutions.

lotwell wrote:Regarding Chinese spies (Tib: rGya nak ki so pa):
How to identify them?
![]()
Lotwell

gregkavarnos wrote:That is the level of paranoia that the Chinese Goverment works at. Not very much unlike the US government really! Or almost any government, now that I stopped to think about it.
Silent Bob wrote:Reading this thread, my heart goes out to the hapless, low-on-the-food chain Chinese intel operative who is tasked with monitoring Dharma Wheel for anything of potential significance. I had a comparable job combing through and "gisting" transcripts of Radio Peking and Radio Pyongyang broadcasts during the 60's and the endless day after day tedium nearly drove me to drink.
Peace out,
Chris
catmoon wrote:Silent Bob wrote:Reading this thread, my heart goes out to the hapless, low-on-the-food chain Chinese intel operative who is tasked with monitoring Dharma Wheel for anything of potential significance. I had a comparable job combing through and "gisting" transcripts of Radio Peking and Radio Pyongyang broadcasts during the 60's and the endless day after day tedium nearly drove me to drink.
Peace out,
Chris
Geez, I never thought of this before. Somewhere in China some poor SOB is trying to make sense of all these lolcat messages and references that keep popping up. He's wonderiing like why would anyone put a hat on a cat then laugh at it?
Haha they'll never crack the code.

catmoon wrote:Silent Bob wrote:Reading this thread, my heart goes out to the hapless, low-on-the-food chain Chinese intel operative who is tasked with monitoring Dharma Wheel for anything of potential significance. I had a comparable job combing through and "gisting" transcripts of Radio Peking and Radio Pyongyang broadcasts during the 60's and the endless day after day tedium nearly drove me to drink.
Peace out,
Chris
Geez, I never thought of this before. Somewhere in China some poor SOB is trying to make sense of all these lolcat messages and references that keep popping up. He's wonderiing like why would anyone put a hat on a cat then laugh at it?
Haha they'll never crack the code.

Huseng wrote:China is actually barely held together. It is economically and culturally fractured in many ways. The rural poor have little to do with the rich elite of Shanghai and elsewhere. Southern China thinks of itself as culturally different from the north, too.
There are continual riots across the country which are not reported by national media. It isn't just Tibetans and Uyghurs who are mistreated.
If the economic success wears thin you could easily see the whole thing unravel. I think the elites are aware of this and this is why many of them take out a second citizenship (for instance you can buy a Canadian passport legitimately with an "investor visa").
Matylda wrote:Huseng wrote:China is actually barely held together. It is economically and culturally fractured in many ways. The rural poor have little to do with the rich elite of Shanghai and elsewhere. Southern China thinks of itself as culturally different from the north, too.
There are continual riots across the country which are not reported by national media. It isn't just Tibetans and Uyghurs who are mistreated.
If the economic success wears thin you could easily see the whole thing unravel. I think the elites are aware of this and this is why many of them take out a second citizenship (for instance you can buy a Canadian passport legitimately with an "investor visa").
It is no problem for China... it is the way the country was always during their history, which embraces chronology of all other world civilizations, which did not survive. Including the Egypt of pharaohs)) so we should not underestimate ability of China to hold together etc.
There were always riots, culture, nations and language differences, south and north gap, poor and rich etc. etc. etc. and what?!Just look, It is still Great China... they went even through craziness of CR, hunger and starvation, etc. etc. such factors are mostly reason for the countries or systems to collapse... but not in China. They are very skillful in managing all difficulties, regardless human costs. You yourself know Chinese, their language etc., so you should know their history as well...
Tibet is really minor problem for China, and they manage it very well, keeping all governments silent, including USA and Russia, and all the pro-tibetan movements are well watched by the Chinese espionage and special departments in Chinese embassies all over the world. They have resources, money, manpower, etc. etc.
Uyghurs is another political problem. First they are supported by their Muslim brothers, money and weapons are coming by different channels, Chinese are cornered in Xian, and have to defend themselves, China is a bit stuck, since they get crude oil from m. brothers, and they also want to make business with them in Africa. Uighurs are able to launch successful military attacks on Chinese bases. This is real pain in Chinese as... so there is only Islam which is not negotiable power and gives a kick in crouch... And STILL China holds it.
And Tibetans? Who cares in the world?! The biggest one can imagine are symbolic gestures, that is all ...
China having great intelligence refills now Tibetan Buddhist structures with their own tulkus, lamas, people etc.is doing the grass root work, and will succeed one day or another, if there will be no change. And there will be no change... they did not changed for last 5000 years, why they should change now
I think you will find that Tibetan Buddhism will do just fine after the Dalai Lamas death. With or without a Dalai Lama.Red Faced Buddha wrote:When the Dalai Lama is dead,Tibetan Buddhism will crumble.I don't need an oracle to tell me that.China will "find" the "new" Dalai Lama just like they did the Panchen Lama.No doubt he'll be a puppet for China.Then,the monks will try to find the new Dalai Lama but China will most likely try to stop this.What really worries me though,is what if China actually picks the real Dalai Lama(knowingly or unknowingly)and manages to brainwash him.I think the Dalai Lama should try to reincarnate somewhere else or try to achieve enlightenment in this lifetime.At least then the Chinese won't be able to sink their fingers into his next incarnation.

gregkavarnos wrote:I think you will find that Tibetan Buddhism will do just fine after the Dalai Lamas death. With or without a Dalai Lama.Red Faced Buddha wrote:When the Dalai Lama is dead,Tibetan Buddhism will crumble.I don't need an oracle to tell me that.China will "find" the "new" Dalai Lama just like they did the Panchen Lama.No doubt he'll be a puppet for China.Then,the monks will try to find the new Dalai Lama but China will most likely try to stop this.What really worries me though,is what if China actually picks the real Dalai Lama(knowingly or unknowingly)and manages to brainwash him.I think the Dalai Lama should try to reincarnate somewhere else or try to achieve enlightenment in this lifetime.At least then the Chinese won't be able to sink their fingers into his next incarnation.
You do realise that the Dalai Lama lineage (offically) only started in 1578? That the first two Dalai Lama (Gendun Drup and GendunGyatso) were recognised as such posthumusly anyway? That the first tulku lineage were actually the Karmapas, beginining with the first Karmapa Dusum Khyenpa (a student of Gampopa) who lived from 1110-1193? That Buddhism "officially" took a Tibetan turn with Padmasambhava around 770?
Buddhism existed in Tibet well before the Dalai Lama and will conitinue to exist after his demise (long life to him!).
PS It may also surprise you to know that the Dalai Lama has already stated that he will not reincarnate again.

Yudron wrote:Greg, I don't think the Dalai Lama has stated he will not reincarnate again, just that he won't do so inside Chinese territory.