by ronnewmexico » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:15 pm
Thanks for providing this...
I have seen both seemingly disconcerting views of this thing...sitting in a temple learning ceremony, and having a Lama speak on the necssity of being a male and having that reinforced in prayer of sorts that specifically asks for rebirth as male....
And thinking...what the writer firstly wrote had to be....there are male and female aspects to all of any gender and both are necessary to attain what is called enlightenment, not just female and not just male.
And sitting at retreat house supposedly in silence, at that time many guest benefactors planning for a Rinpoche's visit and teaching in attendence....... a female benefactor stateing quite loudly and proudly....Lama so in so says Dharma in the west is to be led by females, not males.
Seemingly there is little benefit to state either is best or more necessary to attain enlightenment, both characteristics are necessary....compassion forgiveness, adaptability..... strength, stubborness amd singular determination....all aspects of our awareness are necessarily understood for enlightenement to be realized it seems...... and the dharma knows no gender bias nor requirement.
"This order considers that progress can be achieved more rapidly during a single month of self-transformation through terrifying conditions in rough terrain and in "the abode of harmful forces" than through meditating for a period of three years in towns and monasteries"....Takpo Tashi Namgyal.