Alex123 wrote:Hello all,
Did anyone study Bankei's teaching? Can someone explain his "method"?
The Master addressed the assembly:
"What I tell everyone is nothing but the fact that the Unborn Buddha Mind is marvelously illuminating. You're all endowed with the Buddha Mind, but since you don't know it, I'm telling you and trying to make you understand."Well, then, just what does it mean that everybody has the Buddha Mind? All of you came from home with the express intention of hearing what I've got to say, so you're supposed to be listening to the sermon. But, in the course of listening to my talk, if a dog barks outside the temple,you recognize it as the voice of a dog; if a crow caws, you know it's a crow; if you hear the voice of an adult, you know it's an adult; if you hear the voice of a child, you knowit's a child. What I mean is that when you all left your homes to come here to the temple, you did so precisely in order to hear me speak this way; you didn't come with any preconceived idea that if, while I was talking, there were sounds of dogs and birds, children or grown-ups some-where outside, you were deliberately going to try to hear them. Yet here in the meeting you recognize the noises of dogs and crows outside and the sounds of people talking;your eyes can distinguish red from white, and your nose tell good smells from bad. From the start, you had no deliberate intention of doing this, so you had no way to know which sounds, colors or smells you would encounter. But the fact that you recognize these things you didn't expect to see or hear shows you're seeing and hearing with the Unborn Buddha Mind. If outside the temple a dog barks, you know it's a dog; if a crow caws, you know it's a crow. Even though you're not deliberately trying to hear or not to hear these different sounds, you recognize each one the moment it appears, and this is proof of the Buddha Mind, unborn and marvelously illuminating. This not deliberately trying to see or hear is the Unborn....
Anders wrote:Bankei was perhaps too direct at times. If his most basic advice didn't make intuitive sense, it really doesn't give you much to go on.
anjali wrote:Bankei's method is to recognize and rest in the knowing quality of the mind.
Alex123 wrote:anjali wrote:Bankei's method is to recognize and rest in the knowing quality of the mind.
Is it possible to rephrase as:
Don't interfere with mental-states. Don't push bad mental-states away or try to create and prolong "good" mental-states.
Astus wrote:Another thing about Bankei is that he taught openly to everyone. No special requirements, no secret techniques. The teaching of the buddha-mind includes everyone because all beings have the unborn without exception.
to all the unknown masters that did just the same.oushi wrote:Bankei's role in Zen is no less important than that of Hakuin or Dogen, just because he didn't leave any guidelines. His Dharma remained pure.to all the unknown masters that did just the same.
Meido wrote:oushi wrote:Bankei's role in Zen is no less important than that of Hakuin or Dogen, just because he didn't leave any guidelines. His Dharma remained pure.to all the unknown masters that did just the same.
Indeed. Critique of Bankei that I have seen generally centers on points I mentioned, not on his realization or place among the luminaries of Japanese Zen.
~ Meido
Astus wrote:As said before, the first and most important thing is to recognise the unborn. What is the unborn mind? Using Bankei's explanation, it is this mind that while you are reading hears the background noises, sees things around the monitor, feels the chair, and all of that happens without intentionally trying to perceive them.
Meido wrote:One may judge for oneself if Bankei was guilty of that common error of those who have reached - through great practice and effort - a place of effortlessness: coming to think that the past practice and effort, with all its successes and sometimes bitter failures, was not an important part of one's formation. When we read the records of his exchanges with his audience, as they ask very natural beginner's questions to the effect of "well, HOW do I abide in this Unborn, because I just can't seem to get it", we may be forgiven for sometimes wishing that he might give them something more in the way of supportive practices.
Alex123 wrote:Even though he keeps telling us that it was un-needed, maybe he is mistaken in this part?
Meido wrote:When we read the records of his exchanges with his audience, as they ask very natural beginner's questions to the effect of "well, HOW do I abide in this Unborn, because I just can't seem to get it", we may be forgiven for sometimes wishing that he might give them something more in the way of supportive practices.
~ Meido
Users browsing this forum: Beatzen and 3 guests