Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

No holds barred discussion on the Buddhadharma. Argue about rebirth, karma, commentarial interpretations etc. Be nice to each other.

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Sherab Dorje » Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:41 pm

So are you saying that the shared (let's say ritual) similarities between Buddhist Tantra and Hindu Tantra (for example) are not an example of a shared methodology: a "Tantrism", or "Tantric" approach, if you wish? (let me add you kicked off the use of the word in this thread, I made no such mention previously). :namaste:
PS I am not being argumentative, I am trying to understand.
"When one is not in accord with the true view
Meditation and conduct become delusion,
One will not attain the real result
One will be like a blind man who has no eyes."
Naropa - Summary of the View from The Eight Doha Treasures
User avatar
Sherab Dorje
Former staff member
 
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Malcolm » Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:44 pm

gregkavarnos wrote:So are you saying that the shared (let's say ritual) similarities between Buddhist Tantra and Hindu Tantra (for example) are not an example of a shared methodology: a "Tantrism", or "Tantric" approach, if you wish? (let me add you kicked off the use of the word in this thread, I made no such mention previously). :namaste:
PS I am not being argumentative, I am trying to understand.



They share methodologies and similarities because they both come from Indian culture, but not because there was something special about "tantra" itself.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

" The one who teaches the benefits of peace,
he is said to be a ṛṣī; the others are the opposite of him."

-- Uttaratantra
Malcolm
 
Posts: 10165
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Sherab Dorje » Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:46 pm

"Special"???

And if it was merely an Indian culutral accretion then why did not all Indian religious or spiritual movements utilise it? Actually, I should be more specific (since all of them did use it): Why was it not the way all Indian religious or spiritual movements practiced per se (because it seems to have been a "fringe" thing).
:namaste:
"When one is not in accord with the true view
Meditation and conduct become delusion,
One will not attain the real result
One will be like a blind man who has no eyes."
Naropa - Summary of the View from The Eight Doha Treasures
User avatar
Sherab Dorje
Former staff member
 
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Malcolm » Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:04 pm

gregkavarnos wrote:Why was it not the way all Indian religious or spiritual movements practiced per se (because it seems to have been a "fringe" thing).
:namaste:


Subsequent to British Colonialism, forms of religion deemed offensive to the British were largely purged by Western Educated Hindus. Hence what we now think of a "fringe" thing was the dominant religious form among Hindus until the 17th century i.e. the so called Shakti traditions.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

" The one who teaches the benefits of peace,
he is said to be a ṛṣī; the others are the opposite of him."

-- Uttaratantra
Malcolm
 
Posts: 10165
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Sherab Dorje » Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:19 pm

Got it in regards to the "fringe" thing! Thank you!

Still some nagging doubt about the -ism bit. What is it about the practice of tantra (or tantric practice) in Hindu and Buddhist religion that does not make it an -ism?
:namaste:
"When one is not in accord with the true view
Meditation and conduct become delusion,
One will not attain the real result
One will be like a blind man who has no eyes."
Naropa - Summary of the View from The Eight Doha Treasures
User avatar
Sherab Dorje
Former staff member
 
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Malcolm » Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:34 pm

gregkavarnos wrote:Got it in regards to the "fringe" thing! Thank you!

Still some nagging doubt about the -ism bit. What is it about the practice of tantra (or tantric practice) in Hindu and Buddhist religion that does not make it an -ism?
:namaste:



Tantrism is more or less a Western academic fabrication.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

" The one who teaches the benefits of peace,
he is said to be a ṛṣī; the others are the opposite of him."

-- Uttaratantra
Malcolm
 
Posts: 10165
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Jikan » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:42 pm

Malcolm wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:Why was it not the way all Indian religious or spiritual movements practiced per se (because it seems to have been a "fringe" thing).
:namaste:


Subsequent to British Colonialism, forms of religion deemed offensive to the British were largely purged by Western Educated Hindus. Hence what we now think of a "fringe" thing was the dominant religious form among Hindus until the 17th century i.e. the so called Shakti traditions.


this may be the exception that proves the rule: think about Aurobindo Ghose's integration of shaktism & advaita along lines suggested by English idealism. Aurobindo was committed to Shaktism; his very long epic poem Savitri (much of which is stunningly beautiful) describes this in detail.
Jikan
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4285
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby pueraeternus » Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:17 pm

Malcolm wrote:There are no real objective accounts, just sectarian annals on both sides.


Noted. Ah well, guess no religious movements are free from self-glorifying myth-making.
When I set out to lead humanity along my Golden Path I promised a lesson their bones would remember. I know a profound pattern humans deny with words even while their actions affirm it. They say they seek security and quiet, conditions they call peace. Even as they speak, they create seeds of turmoil and violence.

- Leto II, the God Emperor
User avatar
pueraeternus
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Karma Dondrup Tashi » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:43 pm

Jikan wrote:this may be the exception that proves the rule: think about Aurobindo Ghose's integration of shaktism & advaita along lines suggested by English idealism. Aurobindo was committed to Shaktism; his very long epic poem Savitri (much of which is stunningly beautiful) describes this in detail.


:twothumbsup:

Aurobindo's one of the last non-Buddhist teachers I can't part with. I have an addiction. Savitri is beautiful.
User avatar
Karma Dondrup Tashi
 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby deepbluehum » Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:46 pm

Shakti is a flame. Buddha blows it out.
deepbluehum
 
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby underthetree » Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:07 am

deepbluehum wrote:Shakti is a flame. Buddha blows it out.


No. That's not true at all.
User avatar
underthetree
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:44 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby deepbluehum » Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:12 am

underthetree wrote:
deepbluehum wrote:Shakti is a flame. Buddha blows it out.


No. That's not true at all.


Have you ever received shaktipat?
deepbluehum
 
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby deepbluehum » Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:15 am

Image
deepbluehum
 
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby deepbluehum » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:21 am

Image
deepbluehum
 
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Red Faced Buddha » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:55 am

deepbluehum wrote:Funny how in Buddhist tantras you have Buddhist deities stepping on the faces of Hindu deities, but not the other way around.


That doesn't make much sense considering several Buddhist deities are based on Hindu gods.Buddhist gods usually trample on beings who are personifications of ignorance,lust,etc.
Anyway,is Vajrayana and Buddhist tantra the same thing?
A person once asked me why I would want to stop rebirth. "It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want to be reborn."
I replied. "Wanting to be reborn is like wanting to stay in a jail cell, when you have the chance to go free and experience the whole wide world. Does a convict, on being freed from his shabby, constricting, little cell, suddenly say "I really want to go back to jail and be put in a cell. It sounds pretty cool. Being able to come back. Who wouldn't want that?"
Red Faced Buddha
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:16 am
Location: The Middle of Nowhere

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Namgyal » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:08 am

Malcolm wrote: That is a pretty unfounded statement. Did you forget Shankaracarya? Navy Nyaya?


Nope, because vishishtadvaitavedanta is a straight rip-off of Buddhism...as for my rather generalised statement, perhaps it's better to say, 'True sons of Arya-Nagarjuna are invincible in debate'.
:namaste: R.
Namgyal
 
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Namgyal » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:17 am

Of course none of this would have happened if the differences between their respective religions was 'non-existent'.
Straw man. I never said that there are no differences, I said that there are no boundaries, or to be exact:
gregkavarnos wrote:If there are boundaries, they must be pretty bloody porous (to the point of being non-existent).........This does not deny the existence of seperate religions.



Such casuistry! You have missed your vocation as a lawyer, Greg ;)
Namgyal
 
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby deepbluehum » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:46 pm

Red Faced Buddha wrote:That doesn't make much sense considering several Buddhist deities are based on Hindu gods.Buddhist gods usually trample on beings who are personifications of ignorance,lust,etc.


In the Buddhist pantheon, the notion is the deities are "enlightened forms," of Hindu deities. For example, Avalokiteshvara is thought to be the enlightened form of Mahadeva, aka, Shiva. Lokeshvara is an epithet for Shiva.

Red Faced Buddha wrote:Anyway,is Vajrayana and Buddhist tantra the same thing?


Yeah, basically. There are ways of using the word tantra to include Dzogchen tantras which are, by some accounts, beyond Vajrayana. But for the most part Vajrayana is the proper term of "Buddhist tantra," which is just how us Westerners talk about the subject.
deepbluehum
 
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby Sherab Dorje » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:54 pm

Raksha wrote:Such casuistry! You have missed your vocation as a lawyer, Greg ;)
Casuistry... that's a good one! Thank you for teaching me a new word Raksha! :tongue: I'll be sure to add it to my arsenal! :guns:

Actually my parents really wanted me to be a lawyer (or a doctor) but I chose psychology instead! What a fool! Here in Greece the only class of professionals that make real money are lawyers.
:namaste:
"When one is not in accord with the true view
Meditation and conduct become delusion,
One will not attain the real result
One will be like a blind man who has no eyes."
Naropa - Summary of the View from The Eight Doha Treasures
User avatar
Sherab Dorje
Former staff member
 
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Shaivite and Buddhst Tantra. Which came first?

Postby deepbluehum » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:20 pm

Basically, let the transparent energy flow.
deepbluehum
 
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

PreviousNext

Return to Open Dharma

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Inge, Lotus108, Tabkye and 20 guests

>