The Emptiness in Form
The Emptiness in Form
I was contemplating the Emptiness in form that is spoken on in the Heart Sutra and it reminded me of a meditation I was having where Shiva is gazing at his creation and his creation is gazeing into him, pulling out all the unformed into the creation. As Shiva's essence entered Creation, it began to move and come alive. Therefore Shiva and Creation are co-dependant and therefore empty.
I have an impression that as a buddiste I am trying to awaken Shiva to his (our) illusion.
When all creation knows that it is his delusion, and hense realises that the creation is the dreamer. The dreamer will awaken.
But then there is nothing.
No suffering, but nothing else either.
Why as buddistes do we wish to awaken the dreamer?
To end all suffering is to end.
Why do we want to do that?
These are thoughts I have had in meditation, so they are false thoughts but I still wonder why I (we) choose to walk a path that although leading to ultimate truth, will end with non-existance.
The other idea is that when the dreamer (shiva) awakens, he will turn back to his reality and thus so shall we return to reality.
All your ideas and experiences with this thought would be wonderful to hear, so please share.
Jay
I have an impression that as a buddiste I am trying to awaken Shiva to his (our) illusion.
When all creation knows that it is his delusion, and hense realises that the creation is the dreamer. The dreamer will awaken.
But then there is nothing.
No suffering, but nothing else either.
Why as buddistes do we wish to awaken the dreamer?
To end all suffering is to end.
Why do we want to do that?
These are thoughts I have had in meditation, so they are false thoughts but I still wonder why I (we) choose to walk a path that although leading to ultimate truth, will end with non-existance.
The other idea is that when the dreamer (shiva) awakens, he will turn back to his reality and thus so shall we return to reality.
All your ideas and experiences with this thought would be wonderful to hear, so please share.
Jay
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Perhaps I'm wrong, but does not this equate 'emptiness' with 'non-existence'? If so, this is not the place to stop on the trail of seeking 'emptiness'.Anistar wrote:I still wonder why I (we) choose to walk a path that although leading to ultimate truth, will end with non-existance.
In English: "Form is emptiness, emptiness is form".
All is form (everything arises from causes and conditions).
Thus: "All is emptiness, emptiness is all".
Forgive me if I misinterpret...
If they can sever like and dislike, along with greed, anger, and delusion, regardless of their difference in nature, they will all accomplish the Buddha Path.. ~ Sutra of Complete Enlightenment
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: The Emptiness in Form
With the realization of emptiness you see appearances and bliss are on nonstop.Anistar wrote:I was contemplating the Emptiness in form that is spoken on in the Heart Sutra and it reminded me of a meditation I was having where Shiva is gazing at his creation and his creation is gazeing into him, pulling out all the unformed into the creation. As Shiva's essence entered Creation, it began to move and come alive. Therefore Shiva and Creation are co-dependant and therefore empty.
I have an impression that as a buddiste I am trying to awaken Shiva to his (our) illusion.
When all creation knows that it is his delusion, and hense realises that the creation is the dreamer. The dreamer will awaken.
But then there is nothing.
No suffering, but nothing else either.
Why as buddistes do we wish to awaken the dreamer?
To end all suffering is to end.
Why do we want to do that?
These are thoughts I have had in meditation, so they are false thoughts but I still wonder why I (we) choose to walk a path that although leading to ultimate truth, will end with non-existance.
The other idea is that when the dreamer (shiva) awakens, he will turn back to his reality and thus so shall we return to reality.
All your ideas and experiences with this thought would be wonderful to hear, so please share.
Jay
Re: The Emptiness in Form
The meaning of non-existence is not that there is nothing there, but that what is there is beyond conceptual thought and elaboration. Our Buddha nature isn't a big nothing, thats just nihilism.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
The reason that things appear to us at all is because they are dependent arisings.
A chair appears (exists conventionally) because it does not exist from its own side.
Shaun
A chair appears (exists conventionally) because it does not exist from its own side.
Shaun
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Emptiness has a form or expression.
In our form the unformed can find emptiness in us
Or we can attune to expressions of the deities or our
other arisings.
In other words Shiva is a form but like our imagination
stops as soon as we do.
In our form the unformed can find emptiness in us
Or we can attune to expressions of the deities or our
other arisings.
In other words Shiva is a form but like our imagination
stops as soon as we do.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Thanks everyone for your replies.
I realise that I should not ask questions but simply ask who is the thinker .
I keep on falling into the illusion .
I realise that I should not ask questions but simply ask who is the thinker .
I keep on falling into the illusion .
Re: The Emptiness in Form
I completely disagree. Asking questions is key to the Buddhist path. In fact, investigation is the second factor of enlightenment. The trouble is asking the right questions, questions that in my mind are rooted in our experience.
Anistar wrote: I realise that I should not ask questions but simply ask who is the thinker .
"The world is made of stories, not atoms."
--- Muriel Rukeyser
--- Muriel Rukeyser
- Thundering Cloud
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:06 pm
Re: The Emptiness in Form
I think of "nothingness" and "emptiness" as not quite the same thing. Though it sounds a little awkward at first, if there is nothingness, then that nothingness exists in a meaningful sense. Far from being empty, such nothingness would actually fill reality in that it would entirely specify the state of reality everywhere. To me, the path is about transcending the binary of existence / non-existence... it's another delusional tendency to be dispelled.Anistar wrote: Why as buddistes do we wish to awaken the dreamer?
To end all suffering is to end.
Why do we want to do that?
These are thoughts I have had in meditation, so they are false thoughts but I still wonder why I (we) choose to walk a path that although leading to ultimate truth, will end with non-existance.
The other idea is that when the dreamer (shiva) awakens, he will turn back to his reality and thus so shall we return to reality.
All your ideas and experiences with this thought would be wonderful to hear, so please share.
Jay
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Furthermore, if there was nothingness then things existed in the past.Thundering Cloud wrote:I think of "nothingness" and "emptiness" as not quite the same thing. Though it sounds a little awkward at first, if there is nothingness, then that nothingness exists in a meaningful sense. Far from being empty, such nothingness would actually fill reality in that it would entirely specify the state of reality everywhere. To me, the path is about transcending the binary of existence / non-existence... it's another delusional tendency to be dispelled.Anistar wrote: Why as buddistes do we wish to awaken the dreamer?
To end all suffering is to end.
Why do we want to do that?
These are thoughts I have had in meditation, so they are false thoughts but I still wonder why I (we) choose to walk a path that although leading to ultimate truth, will end with non-existance.
The other idea is that when the dreamer (shiva) awakens, he will turn back to his reality and thus so shall we return to reality.
All your ideas and experiences with this thought would be wonderful to hear, so please share.
Jay
So by believing in nonexistence, one believes in both existence and nonexistence.
Equanimity is the ground. Love is the moisture. Compassion is the seed. Bodhicitta is the result.
-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra
"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."
-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats
-Paraphrase of Khensur Rinpoche Lobsang Tsephel citing the Guhyasamaja Tantra
"All memories and thoughts are the union of emptiness and knowing, the Mind.
Without attachment, self-liberating, like a snake in a knot.
Through the qualities of meditating in that way,
Mental obscurations are purified and the dharmakaya is attained."
-Ra Lotsawa, All-pervading Melodious Drumbeats
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Understanding emptiness in form is so that forms do not affect you.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Emptiness is form, or form is emptiness is the first skandha of five. They are all empty which essentially means the five skandhas are illusory. In the Pheṇapiṇḍūpamasutta (SN 22.95) of the Samyutta-Nikaya, the skandha/khandha are regarded as empty (rittaka), hollow (tucchaka) and insubstantial (asâraka) (S. iii. 140–142).
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17100
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: The Emptiness in Form
My basic understanding of "form is emptiness" on just an intellectual level is just that what defines a thing as that thing..is the very lack of inherent existence of the thing.
For example we call a car a car, but in the component parts of a car there is no car, therefore "car" is empty, the same goes for anything that manifests or is conceviable, including the Skandhas that make up well...everything. that's why form is actually emptiness, anything we can name or conceptualize is fundamentally empty of itself, and in fact is defined by this characteristic.
For example we call a car a car, but in the component parts of a car there is no car, therefore "car" is empty, the same goes for anything that manifests or is conceviable, including the Skandhas that make up well...everything. that's why form is actually emptiness, anything we can name or conceptualize is fundamentally empty of itself, and in fact is defined by this characteristic.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: The Emptiness in Form
It also cuts both ways - the we doing the naming is also just as empty, on the side of the object we have emptiness + dependent origination and on the side of the "self" we have emptiness, so we have something like emptiness squared + a karmic dependently originated remnant.Johnny Dangerous wrote:...anything we can name or conceptualize is fundamentally empty of itself, and in fact is defined by this characteristic.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Empty words. No meaning does inhere in these words. Just visible forms.Johnny Dangerous wrote:My basic understanding of "form is emptiness" on just an intellectual level is just that what defines a thing as that thing..is the very lack of inherent existence of the thing.
For example we call a car a car, but in the component parts of a car there is no car, therefore "car" is empty, the same goes for anything that manifests or is conceviable, including the Skandhas that make up well...everything. that's why form is actually emptiness, anything we can name or conceptualize is fundamentally empty of itself, and in fact is defined by this characteristic.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
That's interesting you use the word "forms", because being a thoroughly modern kinda guy I always thought form meant structure rather then content, but later I realised that it meant matter - form in the sense used by the ancient Greek philosophers. Its kinda strange that whichever way you understand it, you still get a very similar result.ground wrote:Just visible forms.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Aren't words just visible structure? Words do not contain anything.Words are just manifestations, instances of visible structure, aren't they?futerko wrote:That's interesting you use the word "forms", because being a thoroughly modern kinda guy I always thought form meant structure rather then content, ...ground wrote:Just visible forms.
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Yes, that's it exactly. Even more than that, words form a net of a neverending cycle - every word is defined by another word and you never get a final word to end this endless circle - it is just like Mara's net.ground wrote:Aren't words just visible structure? Words do not contain anything.Words are just manifestations, instances of visible structure, aren't they?futerko wrote:That's interesting you use the word "forms", because being a thoroughly modern kinda guy I always thought form meant structure rather then content, ...ground wrote:Just visible forms.
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17100
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: The Emptiness in Form
Yes, obviously my words also would share the same property..your point is?ground wrote:Empty words. No meaning does inhere in these words. Just visible forms.Johnny Dangerous wrote:My basic understanding of "form is emptiness" on just an intellectual level is just that what defines a thing as that thing..is the very lack of inherent existence of the thing.
For example we call a car a car, but in the component parts of a car there is no car, therefore "car" is empty, the same goes for anything that manifests or is conceviable, including the Skandhas that make up well...everything. that's why form is actually emptiness, anything we can name or conceptualize is fundamentally empty of itself, and in fact is defined by this characteristic.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: The Emptiness in Form
To take up this never ending cycle ... actually words are not defined by other words but that which generates meaning upon eyes having contacted forms aka words habitually generates this or that meaning depending on having cultivated itself appropriately beforehand.futerko wrote:Yes, that's it exactly. Even more than that, words form a net of a neverending cycle - every word is defined by another word and you never get a final word to end this endless circle - it is just like Mara's net.ground wrote:
Aren't words just visible structure? Words do not contain anything.Words are just manifestations, instances of visible structure, aren't they?