Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
mutsuk wrote:Why? Because thinking that one shares the alayavijnana with others simply means you don't understand that notion. This was so ridiculous...
No, you have shown you don't understand the teachings of Dzogchen, starting with the fact that you think the visions are the object of the eye consciousness. This simply disqualifies you from the start. It means you don't know what is the natural state, what is its rtsal, and what is the nature of the visions.
As Sönam said, it's not because you have no actual experience of this that all others are like you. Actually I know of a french scholar/practitioner who has crossed steps in Thogel that you would not even suspect.
So put down what ?
Well clarifying your projections regarding the rdul-lus for instance would be a good opportunity to avoid misleading others with your misconceptions. That is of importance in my opinion.
You are totally deluded. Yogacara is a sutra-based teaching and Dzogchen is the 9th yana. You certainly cannot compare and if you think there is nothing else in Dzogchen, it simply means you need to read more and study more Dzogchen texts because there is way more than you'll ever find in the Yogacara tradition.
Would you mind sticking to the topic of females having reached the Rainbow Body? Do you have anything interesting to share on that subject?
Jyoti wrote:Also the togal's perception of the special channel connecting the eyes which lead to visionary development are none other than internal perception of the eye consciousness. In other path without prior knowledge of this channel is not a problem when the eye consciousness is being integrated with the intellect, since the vision will manifest when the eye consciousness is being utilize as the medium of perfuming of the seeds.
It mean put down your concerned about this issues which in reality is beyond anyone direct experience.
If one merely follow description from books without apprehending the reason of the transformation and claim it as true, this is least acceptable.
At least I have stated what I perceived to be the reason. A reason is hard to refute without having refuted the elements that is supporting it.
I already stated the reason and explanation,
that would be similarly misleading others with your arrogance.
That is what the Tibetan Vajrayana traditions trying to condition you to think, you may think you are following dzogchen, actually the dzogchen tradition is heavily influence by Tibetan Vajrayana. The vajrayana teaching is of skillful means, it viewed the provisional means of other buddhist school of the mahayana as inferior, this is actually not a problem, the problem is it failed to take into consideration the teaching of definitive meaning also exist in the mahayana. The teaching of definitive meaning belong to the ekayana, viz. it is the one path from beginning to end, all the yanas exist due to its absence, when it exists, all the other yanas are rendered indefinitive. There is no 9 yanas, the 3 internal and external tantras belong to the mahayana, together with the 2 lower yanas, there is only 3 yanas in reality.
Would you mind sticking to the topic of females having reached the Rainbow Body? Do you have anything interesting to share on that subject?
Sure, if I know I will share it.
Jyoti
mutsuk wrote:Going back to the topic of that thread :
There is one recent woman who reached rainbow body. She is famed as Arta Lhamo (a-rta lha-mo) or Tamdrin Lhamo (rta-mgrin lha-mo). She was the daughter of Nyag-bla Byang-chub rdo-rje (the master of ChNNorbu Rinpoche) and Dri-med dbang-mo. She was born in 1923 and studied in details the termas of her father. Among these, those she mastered were :
— the bKa’ ‘dus chos kyi rgya mtsho,
— the Phag-mo’i rlung khrid, which was her main practice,
— the (unnamed) cycle of bCud-len teaching which she practiced for 21 weeks, followed by a week of Sky Chülen (nam-mkha’ bcud-len),
— the sealed teachings of the Yangti Nagpo which his father had not given to more than 4 persons (the text says 5 but lists only 4) : 1. herself, 2. Garwang Dorje, 3. Tertön Dorje Tsegyel, 4. Khenpo Khedrup.
In her father’s house she also listened to Nyingthik teachings numerous times.
She was also destined to be a consort for Tokden Shakya Shrî but there were obstacles and this did not happened.
At the end of her life, on the night of the 27th of the 2nd tibetan month of year 1980, her mind absorbed into the state of contemplation and her body remained sitting for 7 days, after which it started to “melt” (zhu) into lights and decrease in size, first reaching a dimension of about 26 cm and then a “mkhyid” lenght (the mesasure equal to that in between the thumb and little finger in extension). It is reported that numerous people witnessed this and that those who had said bad things about her during her lifetime formulated regrets...
source:
bSod-nams don-grub, "sNga 'gyur rnying ma'i 'ja' lus grub pa'i skyes bu 'ga' zhig ngo sprod mdor tsam zhus pa", Bod ljongs nang bstan, 2, 1990, pp. 1-15.
Pero wrote:Thanks a lot for sharing that!![]()
I wonder if the fifth is Norbu Rinpoche, since he taught trekcho from (a) Yangti Nagpo of CCD last year. Although even if this is one and the same he probably got it from CCD's son and not CCD himself.
Pero wrote:Sorry guys but this behaviour is pretty lame.
heart wrote:Pero wrote:Sorry guys but this behaviour is pretty lame.
what?
/magnus
Do you look like that image? If so, let's go on a date and I'll set you straight. XXX
Pero wrote:heart wrote:Pero wrote:Sorry guys but this behaviour is pretty lame.
what?
/magnus
Stuff like:Do you look like that image? If so, let's go on a date and I'll set you straight. XXX
etc....
Do you look like that image? If so, let's go on a date and I'll set you straight. XXX
humanpreta wrote:C'mon Pero, It's all in good fun and harmless. DW is a sausage party. Jyoti is a big girl and can take it--she's out of control and can use a some straight settin. A little levity ain't ever killed nobody. Come on old boy ....you dig?
Buddhists often suppress their ids. Mine's probably too lose...what can I say? That's what happens when I see a pretty image. Don't mean to offend no one.
If you have a complaint about a post that's been made...
Use the Report Post function (exclamation mark in a square) and we will attend to your report as quickly as practicable, given our available staff. Please do not publicly quote and object to the content of a post, because this then embeds it within the flow of conversation and it becomes difficult for moderators to extract the offending material without disrupting the thread. Public complaints, regardless of how legitimate, tend to take threads off-topic and have a tendency to become a sideshow unto themselves. If you're not satisfied with the way we deal with your complaint, proceed to the next step.
"Females who achieved rainbow body"Conceptual vehicles' fruits do not really compare to the fruits of Dzogchen's 4 visions/thogal & if they claim so it is false.
deepbluehum wrote: The fact that Ayu Khandro spent something like 50 years practicing yangti and didn't achieve rainbow is telling us something.
The fact that Ayu Khandro spent something like 50 years practicing yangti and didn't achieve rainbow is telling us something. High hopes at this point is not very important.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests