Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:51 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:

Um, I accept Allan Wallace is a great practitioner. But like Malcolm pointed out, he is wrong on some stuff.


He is not the only one who said this. Skilton, Williams and many other scholars and practitioners said the same thing.



And Ronald Davidson says something else. So what?


So what? It means that you should read more widely. Astus has provided an excellent list of quotations from very accomplished Tibetan Buddhist masters.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:26 am
Posts: 189
pueraeternus wrote:
So what? It means that you should read more widely.


Reading more widely includes your second rate "historians" like Wallace, Williams, A.W. Barber?

No thanks. Been there done that.

I'll go by what Ronald Davidson and Wedemayer say about the subject.


pueraeternus wrote:
Astus has provided an excellent list of quotations from very accomplished Tibetan Buddhist masters.


I guess that no told you that Madhyamaka is pretty big in the Tibetan tradition.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
So what? It means that you should read more widely.


Reading more widely includes your second rate "historians" like Wallace, Williams, A.W. Barber?

No thanks. Been there done that.

I'll go by what Ronald Davidson and Wedemayer say about the subject.


Second rate? What can I say to that, except that your disrespectful derision of all other viewpoints is getting old and tired.

SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
Astus has provided an excellent list of quotations from very accomplished Tibetan Buddhist masters.


I guess that no told you that Madhyamaka is pretty big in the Tibetan tradition.


I guess you don't recognize any of those masters quoted as Tibetan? Madhyamaka is standard Mahayana, so nothing unique about that. The point is that the philosophical basis and infrastructure of tantra is derived from tathagatagarbha, since the inherent buddha nature is the raison d'être for tantric praxis.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:20 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
DarwidHalim wrote:
FOr example, you can say that you don't have any attachment to a piece of paper. But, you always see this white stuff as paper. WHen you see that white stuff, immediately the idea of paper appear in you, and you again think yes this is paper, so it against imprint in you. There is no attachment there. But, there is something like assertion.

They are indeed this word of "With this one can argue saying that arhats are not free from all attachments, practically making arhats not free from samsara but stuck in the illusion of liberation; or say that tathagatagarbha teachings are only provisional, turning sudden paths into illusory baits."

But if you see the teaching like Nagarjuna, Chandrakirti, they don't say something like that. Those sentences are more to personal view.


You say that there is attachment to the concept of paper. Again, that is attachment to the mental aggregates, since the concept and even the visual impression occurs within the aggregates. But such attachment is not possible, or it is not liberation. Assertion, as they say in madhyamaka, is the extreme of existence, and negation is the extreme of non-existence. These are the basics of mistaken views, and views exist in the aggregates.

Nagarjuna is early mahayana, and Chandrakirti did not follow the tathagatagarbha teachings either.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:39 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
Jnana wrote:
A pragmatic approach is, well, practical.... But it seems that a bodhisattva is still required to develop a number of capabilities that aren't necessary for an arhat liberated through discernment. For example, the first five of the six higher knowledges and samyaksaṃbodhi. These differences are also accepted by Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda, etc.


There are differences explained in all traditions all right. However, in order to be inclusive, looking at the existing and the disappeared traditions, what actual practices are prescribed and followed don't show different ways. One important idea, however, is an exception. And that is post-enlightenment practices. For an arhat, that's the end of the story, and there are no further instructions. For a bodhisattva, it is the beginning of accumulating infinite merits. So what mahayana adds is a programme for enlightened ones. Or, it is not a prescription but a description. That is, those who have attained liberation are still active as we can see both from old texts and among today's teachers. A third option is that the bodhisattva teaching is a cure for those who failed to apply the teachings to social life. Fourth option is that it's a later technique to bring more people to the Dharma. All of these and more can be said and put together - i.e. all can be true at the same time - as a natural development of Buddhism.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:44 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
viniketa wrote:
but the hierarchical rankings come primarily from commentarial literature, do they not? There is probably something I am missing, here...


The Lotus Sutra is the number one source of the hierarchical structure of liberation, where sravakas attain only a fake nirvana before they turn to the bodhisattva path.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:26 am
Posts: 189
pueraeternus wrote:
The point is that the philosophical basis and infrastructure of tantra is derived from tathagatagarbha, since the inherent buddha nature is the raison d'être for tantric praxis.




You should read "Center of the Sunlit Sky" by Karl B.

Madhyamaka is the foundation of Vajrayana and Mahamudra.


Last edited by catmoon on Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Insult deleted


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:39 am
Posts: 819
Location: USA
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
This is the first I'm hearing that Buddha Nature texts gave rise to Vajrayana.

Ronald Davidson said Madhaymaka gave rise to Vajrayana...


Historically, Vajrayāna is best understood as deriving from a combination of Madhyamaka, Tathāgatagarbha, and prior tantric practices (Indian & otherwise).


:namaste:

_________________
If they can sever like and dislike, along with greed, anger, and delusion, regardless of their difference in nature, they will all accomplish the Buddha Path.. ~ Sutra of Complete Enlightenment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
viniketa wrote:
Jnana wrote:
Astus wrote:
Unlike Yinshun, I prefer the idea of a single vehicle, where the paths are not separate or hierarchical, but provisional in form and one in nature.
A pragmatic approach is, well, practical.... But it seems that a bodhisattva is still required to develop a number of capabilities that aren't necessary for an arhat liberated through discernment. For example, the first five of the six higher knowledges and samyaksaṃbodhi. These differences are also accepted by Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda, etc.


I must say I'm with Astus on this one! :twothumbsup: The 'provisional' is easy enough to substantiate. Yes, there is liberation with 'extra' qualities -- that is difficult to refute -- but the hierarchical rankings come primarily from commentarial literature, do they not?

Yes, the Śrāvaka commentaries and the early Prajñāpāramitā sūtras.

viniketa wrote:
There is probably something I am missing, here... :thinking:

Well, as a pragmatist, I think it's outstanding whenever anyone is motivated to terminate the fetters. I have no interest in trying to lay any other syncretic Ekayāna trip on them if they're not interested in such ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
Astus wrote:
One important idea, however, is an exception. And that is post-enlightenment practices. For an arhat, that's the end of the story, and there are no further instructions.

Yes. And this silence may be one of the most subtle aspects of Gautama's teaching approach.

Astus wrote:
So what mahayana adds is a programme for enlightened ones. Or, it is not a prescription but a description. That is, those who have attained liberation are still active as we can see both from old texts and among today's teachers. A third option is that the bodhisattva teaching is a cure for those who failed to apply the teachings to social life. Fourth option is that it's a later technique to bring more people to the Dharma. All of these and more can be said and put together - i.e. all can be true at the same time - as a natural development of Buddhism.

Indeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
pueraeternus wrote:
Many of these doctrines also have a tendency to create their own mythology to create an aura of pristine authenticity, but all of them have an obvious historic process of development that undercuts their own narratives.

Indeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:39 am
Posts: 819
Location: USA
Jnana wrote:
viniketa wrote:
Well, as a pragmatist, I think it's outstanding whenever anyone is motivated to terminate the fetters. I have no interest in trying to lay any other syncretic Ekayāna trip on them if they're not interested in such ideas.


It's very clear that one should practice in the manner best suited to one's own 'conditions', no argument there. Ekayāna is not 'late' syncretism, though, as one of the earliest Buddhist schools was the Ekavyāvahārika, who also taught that Buddha taught from a unified, transcendent position. :smile:

*Perhaps a more unified tradition will come along with Buddha Maitreya and the next 'turning of the wheel'...

:namaste:

_________________
If they can sever like and dislike, along with greed, anger, and delusion, regardless of their difference in nature, they will all accomplish the Buddha Path.. ~ Sutra of Complete Enlightenment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:31 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
This is probably the stupidest thing I ever read on this forum.

You should read "Center of the Sunlit Sky" by Karl B.

Madhyamaka is the foundation of Vajrayana and Mahamudra.


Karl Brunnhölzl presents the Kagyü interpretation of madhyamaka, where there is also an "emptiness endowed with the supreme of all aspects." (p. 115f). Also, regarding Mahamudra, "Gampopa, Pamo Truba (1110–1170), Jigden Sumgön (1143–1217), and many others have said that "the treatise of our Mahamudra is this Treatise of the Sublime Continuum of the Great Vehicle composed by the Blessed One Maitreya."" (p. 57), which is also called Ratnagotravibhaga, the classical shastra on tathagatagarbha doctrine. Gampopa starts his Jewel Ornament of Liberation with stating the existence of buddha-nature. Brunnhölzl's teacher, Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche is famous for his teaching of Zhentong, that is again takes buddha-nature as a fundamental doctrine, and he confirms it as the basis of Vajrayana in his commentary on the Uttaratantra Shastra (Buddha Nature, p. 305-306).

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:26 am
Posts: 189
Astus wrote:
Karl Brunnhölzl presents the Kagyü interpretation of madhyamaka, where there is also an "emptiness endowed with the supreme of all aspects." (p. 115f).


And?

Astus wrote:
and many others have said that "the treatise of our Mahamudra is this Treatise of the Sublime Continuum of the Great Vehicle composed by the Blessed One Maitreya."" (p. 57), which is also called Ratnagotravibhaga, the classical shastra on tathagatagarbha doctrine.


How is this the Ratnagotravibhaga? I'm reading the footnote 191. I don't get it.

Astus wrote:
Brunnhölzl's teacher, Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche is famous for his teaching of Zhentong, that is again takes buddha-nature as a fundamental doctrine, and he confirms it as the basis of Vajrayana in his commentary on the Uttaratantra Shastra (Buddha Nature, p. 305-306).


Not really.


Anyway, you are free to keep ignoring the other 99.9% of the book and keep "reaching".
Mahamudra comes straight outta Madhyamaka, just like NWA came straight outta Compton.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 1502
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:

Astus wrote:
Brunnhölzl's teacher, Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche is famous for his teaching of Zhentong, that is again takes buddha-nature as a fundamental doctrine, and he confirms it as the basis of Vajrayana in his commentary on the Uttaratantra Shastra (Buddha Nature, p. 305-306).


Not really.


Anyway, you are free to keep ignoring the other 99.9% of the book and keep "reaching".
Mahamudra comes straight outta Madhyamaka, just like NWA came straight outta Compton.

Shentong and it's presentation of buddhanature is a key middle way philosophy. Understanding this is vital for an understanding of Vajrayana.
It's good that you are posting here because you can learn something you might have missed otherwise.

_________________
The Blessed One said:

"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:26 am
Posts: 189
Andrew108 wrote:
Shentong and it's presentation of buddhanature is a key middle way philosophy. Understanding this is vital for an understanding of Vajrayana.


I think you mean Shentong is a pure Tibetan invention.

There was no Shentong in Indian Madhyamaka.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 1502
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
Andrew108 wrote:
Shentong and it's presentation of buddhanature is a key middle way philosophy. Understanding this is vital for an understanding of Vajrayana.


I think you mean Shentong is a pure Tibetan invention.

There was no Shentong in Indian Madhyamaka.

Well then I must be wrong and you must be right. Thank you for letting me know. Now I have learnt something new.

_________________
The Blessed One said:

"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:52 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
How is this the Ratnagotravibhaga? I'm reading the footnote 191. I don't get it.


Check the Bibliography on page 835.

"The Sublime Continuum. (Ratnagotravibhagamahayanottaratantrasastra. Theg pa chen po’i rgyud bla ma) Sanskrit edition by Edward H. Johnston. Patna, India: The Bihar Research Society, 1950 (includes the Ratnagotravibhagavyakhya). P5525. ACIP TD4024."

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:26 am
Posts: 189
Astus wrote:
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
How is this the Ratnagotravibhaga? I'm reading the footnote 191. I don't get it.


Check the Bibliography on page 835.

"The Sublime Continuum. (Ratnagotravibhagamahayanottaratantrasastra. Theg pa chen po’i rgyud bla ma) Sanskrit edition by Edward H. Johnston. Patna, India: The Bihar Research Society, 1950 (includes the Ratnagotravibhagavyakhya). P5525. ACIP TD4024."



Yeah I don't get it. Whats the connection to Maitripa?

I will stick by what the other 99.9% of the book says like on page 63, page 65 or pretty much any other page.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unorthodox Ideas
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
Yeah I don't get it. Whats the connection to Maitripa?

It's said that Maitrīpa rediscovered the Uttaratantraśāstra.

SSJ3Gogeta wrote:
I will stick by what the other 99.9% of the book says like on page 63, page 65 or pretty much any other page.

It's well known that Gampopa and the Kagyudpas maintain that the Uttaratantraśāstra is the source text for sūtra mahāmudrā teachings. For example, Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra with Commentary, p. 15:

    Sutra-Mahamudra is the name the incomparable Dhagpo Rinpoche, Gampopa, lent to the view expressed in the Uttara Tantra Shastra.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Saoshun and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group