I think his terminology is very idiosyncratic, and does not agree even with the other Ajahns of the forest tradition. The way he defines the khandhas as distinct from the citta (which nevertheless seems to perform some functions normally attributed to the khandhas) is puzzling. Even some Western monks adopt this way of talking which is then confusing. Some people have compared it to the ideas more commonly found in the Upanishads or Hindu systems of meditation.
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)
- Theravada texts
- Translations and history of Pali texts
- Sutta translations