We found a small newborn kitten alone on the side of our dirt road. He had been abandoned by his mother to be devoured by ants, probably because he was the runt and is missing a foot. I named him Forsaken. Clearly, his reproductive karma is quite negative. He was born as a pitiful runt kitten and disowned by his mother, separated from his family immediately.
However, this question came up and we have discussed it. As we drove by my friend spotted something in the grass and we rescued him, cleaned him and force-fed him from a syringe. My question is, is it just happenstance that we found him and saved him, or is it actually his counteractive karma that worked against his sustaining karma? I'm very inclined to the latter notion and have been from the start.
From my understanding, the reason everything is not determined by karma but only mostly influenced by it, is because our karma (actions), according to intentions, always push us and try to lead us to our fruits, in one way or another. But the world is inherently empty so therefore it's impossible to avoid chaos and accident despite our karmas. So, this leads me to consider that against his reproductive and sustaining karma, Forsaken has experienced his counteractive karma in this way, to relieve him of his reproductive afflictions and prevent his sustaining afflictions.
At any rate, this should produce some helpful discussion for fellow Buddhists.


