Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
ngodrup wrote:Seems there's another category, the ngakpa who is ordained as such. At least this exists in the Nyingma.
I think its going to be a case by case analysis when talking about ngakpas who also happen to be western--
just the same as it is with those ngakpas from traditionally Buddhist countries. On top of that there are
various lineages of ngakpas and their style of practice varies.
Quite a few are practitioners of Dudjom Tersar, or Longchen Nyingtik, or Chang Ter; but then there are
dratsangs that practice several lineages and follow distinct traditions.
heart wrote:ngodrup wrote:Seems there's another category, the ngakpa who is ordained as such. At least this exists in the Nyingma.
I think its going to be a case by case analysis when talking about ngakpas who also happen to be western--
just the same as it is with those ngakpas from traditionally Buddhist countries. On top of that there are
various lineages of ngakpas and their style of practice varies.
Quite a few are practitioners of Dudjom Tersar, or Longchen Nyingtik, or Chang Ter; but then there are
dratsangs that practice several lineages and follow distinct traditions.
It isn't actually a ordination, like the ordination to become a monk/nun, it is an empowerment. You can call it an elaborate Samaya if you like.
/magnus
Blue Garuda wrote:heart wrote:
It isn't actually a ordination, like the ordination to become a monk/nun, it is an empowerment. You can call it an elaborate Samaya if you like.
/magnus
There is often formal ordination based on tantric samayas.
Blue Garuda wrote:heart wrote:ngodrup wrote:Seems there's another category, the ngakpa who is ordained as such. At least this exists in the Nyingma.
I think its going to be a case by case analysis when talking about ngakpas who also happen to be western--
just the same as it is with those ngakpas from traditionally Buddhist countries. On top of that there are
various lineages of ngakpas and their style of practice varies.
Quite a few are practitioners of Dudjom Tersar, or Longchen Nyingtik, or Chang Ter; but then there are
dratsangs that practice several lineages and follow distinct traditions.
It isn't actually a ordination, like the ordination to become a monk/nun, it is an empowerment. You can call it an elaborate Samaya if you like.
/magnus
There is often formal ordination based on tantric samayas.l
Malcolm wrote:A real sngags pa (mantrika) is someone whose mantras actually work.
As such, they are the Tibetan equivalent of brahmins, and often belong to family lineages. Like traditional brahmins they wear white, have long hair, are married and are responsible for the ritual life of their communities.
heart wrote:Malcolm wrote:A real sngags pa (mantrika) is someone whose mantras actually work.
As such, they are the Tibetan equivalent of brahmins, and often belong to family lineages. Like traditional brahmins they wear white, have long hair, are married and are responsible for the ritual life of their communities.
Yes, indeed. My Guru also said several times said that we should be able to show "some result from our practice" if we dress like that. Even tough I am a Ngakpa I have doubts about what Ngakpas could or should be here in the west. The picture you paint here Malcolm would certainly only work in a Buddhist society.
/magnus
Malcolm wrote:heart wrote:Malcolm wrote:A real sngags pa (mantrika) is someone whose mantras actually work.
As such, they are the Tibetan equivalent of brahmins, and often belong to family lineages. Like traditional brahmins they wear white, have long hair, are married and are responsible for the ritual life of their communities.
Yes, indeed. My Guru also said several times said that we should be able to show "some result from our practice" if we dress like that. Even tough I am a Ngakpa I have doubts about what Ngakpas could or should be here in the west. The picture you paint here Malcolm would certainly only work in a Buddhist society.
/magnus
Well, within a community of practitioners it would work just fine.
heart wrote:I just recently gave up using my zen in public because of the amount of shit you get wearing it. It is a relief I must say. Anyway, it is not about clothes.
/magnus
byamspa wrote:heart wrote:I just recently gave up using my zen in public because of the amount of shit you get wearing it. It is a relief I must say. Anyway, it is not about clothes.
/magnus
Which is why mine only comes out among other dharma folks. I would never wear it in 'public'.
Its not really about the clothes, its about doing whats best for one's practice so that practices' goal can be attained.
heart wrote:byamspa wrote:heart wrote:I just recently gave up using my zen in public because of the amount of shit you get wearing it. It is a relief I must say. Anyway, it is not about clothes.
/magnus
Which is why mine only comes out among other dharma folks. I would never wear it in 'public'.
Its not really about the clothes, its about doing whats best for one's practice so that practices' goal can be attained.
"Other dharma folks" is what I mean with public.![]()
/magnus
heart wrote:
Yes, sure. You know any such community?
/magnus
byamspa wrote:*shrug*. I was told to wear mine in practice situations, so i try to do that as practical. If yours was causing problems, I can see that it would be just as practical to put it aside too.
It might slightly dharma-psycho-somatic or something, but i think it helps me focus on what im doing when i wear it.
Users browsing this forum: PadmaVonSamba, Yahoo [Bot] and 13 guests