Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:41 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 639
Location: Mudhole? Slimy? My home, this is.
Inspired by the following thread:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=9638

jmlee369 wrote:
Looking at the actions of other masters, it becomes clear that a profound mastery and realisation of the Dharma does not seem to guarantee perfection of conduct and understanding.


Comment and discuss.

_________________
. . . there they saw a rock! But it wasn't a rock . . .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:22 am
Posts: 109
Well one prime example I had in mind was Master Seung Sahn. As far as ordinary beings can discern the realisation of Masters, sharira are the only physical basis on which we can gauge the realisations of a Master. Master Seung Sahn is acknowledged to have had sexual affairs (as far as I know, these claims seem to be true) and thus, committed a parajika offence. And yet, upon cremation, sharira were found. By tradition of the monastery, the sharira were not collected but disposed of with the rest of the remains.

Likewise, the majority of Mahayana monastics take meals in the afternoon, yet countless Mahayana masters have manifested sharira and other visible signs upon their passing.

I am also reminded of a tale in which a certain Master in China was widely acclaimed and taught vast audiences, and although some of his teachings were proper Dharma, some of this teachings were quite unfounded and thus, he experienced some problems in his next life, but he still attained conditions that were conducive to Dharma practice.

I guess we should keep in mind that only the 8th bhumi and beyond is a state of irreversability; until then, errors are still possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
treehuggingoctopus wrote:
Inspired by the following thread:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=9638

jmlee369 wrote:
Looking at the actions of other masters, it becomes clear that a profound mastery and realisation of the Dharma does not seem to guarantee perfection of conduct and understanding.


Comment and discuss.


It depends if they really have mastery and realisation.

There is the idea that a realized being can act in otherwise shocking ways in order to teach and cultivate expedient causes and conditions for disciples that they are unaware of, though who knows when this actually happens.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:09 pm
Posts: 185
Everyone is human and humans are fallible.
What was acceptable in some contexts in the past could be actionable today. One thinks of the sharp blow to the head administered by some Zen masters to unsuspecting yet sometimes latterly grateful students.
Consider also the almost casual homophobia of others prior to the general unacceptability of such attitudes. Celibate environments are breeding grounds of frustration too, a plugged volcano remains a volcano. Eruptions are inevitable. We may be saddened but should not be surprised when reading of these blessedly rare transgressions.
Different days, different ways and humans are equally fallible today.
The message,if valid should; hopefully transcend its medium.

_________________
More about Mindfulness here
http://bemindful.co.uk/

" A Zen master's life is one continuous mistake."
(Dogen).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am
Posts: 500
Quoting from the original thread:
jmlee369 wrote:
not all pronouncements (or even conduct) of realised masters are neccesarily true. _ _ it becomes clear that a profound mastery and realisation of the Dharma does not seem to guarantee perfection of conduct and understanding
,
One wonders what any level of realisation amounts to if it doesn't improve conduct and understanding and discourage lies :shrug: - Isn't it supposed to be realisation of how things really are?

_________________
"Removing the barrier between this and that is the only solution" {Chogyam Trungpa - "The Lion's Roar"}


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:09 pm
Posts: 185
Depends what you man by realised master I suppose.
If the criterion is 'perfect human being' it'd be a long and potentially fruitless search to discover one.
Why would anyone need to seek such a person in first place please?
Is it a 'koan' sort of exercise?

_________________
More about Mindfulness here
http://bemindful.co.uk/

" A Zen master's life is one continuous mistake."
(Dogen).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:11 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Posts: 4203
Location: Budapest
Regarding bodhisattvas, on the 2nd bhumi they attain purity in the ten virtuous conducts.

_________________
"There is no such thing as the real mind. Ridding yourself of delusion: that's the real mind."
(Sheng-yen: Getting the Buddha Mind, p 73)

"Neither cultivation nor seated meditation — this is the pure Chan of Tathagata."
(Mazu Daoyi, X1321p3b23; tr. Jinhua Jia)

“Don’t rashly seek the true Buddha;
True Buddha can’t be found.
Does marvelous nature and spirit
Need tempering or refinement?
Mind is this mind carefree;
This face, the face at birth."

(Nanyue Mingzan: Enjoying the Way, tr. Jeff Shore; T2076p461b24-26)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1014
Discussions about teachers tend to get ugly in a hurry. It's hard enough for me to not use comparisons regarding my own circumstances let alone someone else's teacher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am
Posts: 500
Osho wrote:
Depends what you man by realised master I suppose.
If the criterion is 'perfect human being' it'd be a long and potentially fruitless search to discover one.
Why would anyone need to seek such a person in first place please?
Is it a 'koan' sort of exercise?


But the understanding of a realised master is unlikely to be worse, in terms of the three poisons, than that of most uneducated laymen, surely? {Conduct, I understand, is a slightly different matter - unless it's clearly informed by misunderstandings_}

_________________
"Removing the barrier between this and that is the only solution" {Chogyam Trungpa - "The Lion's Roar"}


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:09 pm
Posts: 185
But it could be.It's rather a circular discussion. Nothing wrong with those of course but possibly best left to those who acknowledge the validity of the chaps in question.
We don't, as such; in Tariki line. Not to say they are invalid, that's a subjective call. Men create gods to worship as needs be.

_________________
More about Mindfulness here
http://bemindful.co.uk/

" A Zen master's life is one continuous mistake."
(Dogen).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am
Posts: 500
Osho wrote:
But it could be.It's rather a circular discussion. Nothing wrong with those of course, but possibly best left to _ _


Worse than normal understanding? In that case, exactly what would be 'realised' or 'masterful' about them? I realise 'realisation' ( :lol: ) is somehow a non-compounded quality, but doesn't it inevitably 'spill over' into ordinary/relative 'realising' as well? Otherwise, we would have the absurd possibility of a mentally-retarded Buddha not manifesting as such in order to teach, but unable to manifest otherwise :thinking:

'Those who acknowledge the validity of the chap' who led to this thread being opened have already expressed disappointment and more. On the other hand, a monk with a purely intellectual understanding of the dharma could still gain a lot of respect, but might be prone to 'slipping' into hyper-samsaric thinking as this chap seems to _ _

_________________
"Removing the barrier between this and that is the only solution" {Chogyam Trungpa - "The Lion's Roar"}


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:23 am
Posts: 682
Location: Canada
Their motivation is perfect. Their actions are limited by their intellect, accumulated wisdom and culture. Some have supramundane abilities that help a little. They do their best. If they have not tamed their mind and their motivation is tainted they are not realized IMO. Something to watch out for in the investigative phase before one commits completely to a teacher.

Being an expert at one thing does not make you an expert at everything. They often are pretty damn exceptional though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am
Posts: 500
Nemo wrote:
Their actions are limited by their intellect, accumulated wisdom and culture. Some have supramundane abilities that help a little.


There's nothing supramundane about having enough common sense and intuition (not intellect) to see where other people are coming from when you're a 'teacher' sharing personal stories with people from all walks of life, or to see through enough of any culture's hubris to atleast remain silent on it's "hot-button" issues.

[quote="Nemo"]Being an expert at one thing does not make you an expert at everything.[quote="Nemo"]

I think I've already said that realisation, to my understanding, gives you atleast a better handle on everything else. I realise I and (less so) others are breaking forum rules on this pair of threads, so I'd like to shut up now. However, if no-one realised (i.e. no-one other than me) is prepared to atleast say "this guy clearly wasn't showing realisation" with regard to the original thread, then many are likely to be put off Buddhadharma altogether by the whole situation.
:spy: :tantrum: :soapbox: :toilet: :rules: :oops: :rolleye:

_________________
"Removing the barrier between this and that is the only solution" {Chogyam Trungpa - "The Lion's Roar"}


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
Realized teachers? How must be the conduct of nondual nature in order to please my ego?

My own comments will be the nonsense! Finding faults is my own habit, but I can sell it all for being sharp discerment, prajna... no problem.
Bodhichitta; nondual nature; then master and others are equal. Realized ones see only buddhas. Equal! And so conduct is without me-you-action-concepts.

From that the selfless spontaneous warm actions are for the sake of all so that every being can realize the same (so that they can recognize their buddha nature being temporary hidden). Anyway, all that is me told.

I forget usually that all is my own mind, what I meet and who and so on. Therefore I meet here all fools! Hello!

Bowing. :namaste:

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 289
Location: Taiwan
treehuggingoctopus wrote:
Inspired by the following thread:
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=9638

jmlee369 wrote:
Looking at the actions of other masters, it becomes clear that a profound mastery and realisation of the Dharma does not seem to guarantee perfection of conduct and understanding.


Comment and discuss.


So called perfect conduct and understanding differed with the various vehicle of teaching, teacher with high realization is likely to concern mainly with the precept of the higher vehicle which bear no similarity with the lower vehicle of which the majority of buddhists are familiar with. In such a case, only a teacher / student of similar capacity can discern whether such as teacher has deviate from their practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:09 pm
Posts: 185
With all due respect. Might what you describe be a recipe for potential abuse?
Teacher perhaps claiming....
'Well what I did or said may appear to be abusive but as you are of the lower orders, you simply cannot understand the fact that it was not'.

_________________
More about Mindfulness here
http://bemindful.co.uk/

" A Zen master's life is one continuous mistake."
(Dogen).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 289
Location: Taiwan
Osho wrote:
With all due respect. Might what you describe be a recipe for potential abuse?
Teacher perhaps claiming....
'Well what I did or said may appear to be abusive but as you are of the lower orders, you simply cannot understand the fact that it was not'.


One does not rely on teachers based on their personality or conducts but on their teaching, as one of the malayana's four reliances states: "rely on the teaching, not the person".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:41 am
Posts: 2776
This thread should be renamed 'Realized teachers and 'students'- their mundane errors and misconducts'... that shld balance it :thinking:

_________________
TWTB BIES OCB DDM BWF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:09 pm
Posts: 185
Jyoti wrote:
Osho wrote:
With all due respect. Might what you describe be a recipe for potential abuse?
Teacher perhaps claiming....
'Well what I did or said may appear to be abusive but as you are of the lower orders, you simply cannot understand the fact that it was not'.


One does not rely on teachers based on their personality or conducts but on their teaching, as one of the malayana's four reliances states: "rely on the teaching, not the person".

...................................
Thank you. That makes perfect sense. Please excuse my ignorance.
:-)

_________________
More about Mindfulness here
http://bemindful.co.uk/

" A Zen master's life is one continuous mistake."
(Dogen).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
To be aware of a single shortcoming within oneself is more useful than to be aware of a thousand in somebody else. Without pure perception, how can we discern? How then to speak about behaviour by wisdom/compassion emanations?

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LastLegend and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group