Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:55 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
pueraeternus wrote:
It's like when people compare the cooks in a diner and cooks in a top class restaurant, and then someone says the crucial thing is to be able to cook. Yes, we all know that both cooks in a diner and cooks in a top class restaurant can cook, but that is not the point.

If being a cook in a diner precludes one from ever cooking in a top class restaurant, then I agree that anyone considering a career as a cook needs to carefully consider what path they are to take. If not, does it really matter? The important thing is to learn the basics first, like boiling an egg just right.

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
dharmagoat wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
It's like when people compare the cooks in a diner and cooks in a top class restaurant, and then someone says the crucial thing is to be able to cook. Yes, we all know that both cooks in a diner and cooks in a top class restaurant can cook, but that is not the point.

If being a cook in a diner precludes one from ever cooking in a top class restaurant, then I agree that anyone considering a career as a cook needs to carefully consider what path they are to take. If not, does it really matter? The important thing is to learn the basics first, like boiling an egg just right.


It does not matter if all one wants to do is simple cooking. But that is totally different to saying that a chef at a Michellin star restaurant is the same as the cook at Brooklyn Diner around the corner. That is the point.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
pueraeternus wrote:
It does not matter if all one wants to do is simple cooking. But that is totally different to saying that a chef at a Michellin star restaurant is the same as the cook at Brooklyn Diner around the corner. That is the point.

Both are qualified to cook the food they serve.

_________________
May all beings be happy


Last edited by dharmagoat on Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Posts: 1302
Location: San Francisco, CA
pueraeternus wrote:
matchless ability to turn the Dharma...


It is matchless. Whatever skills Buddha had, they were had by developing the same faculty of wisdom. There's nothing missing in the teachings. So it's not useless word play if you haven't established your point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
dharmagoat wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
It does not matter if all one wants to do is simple cooking. But that is totally different to saying that a chef at a Michellin star restaurant is the same as the cook at Brooklyn Diner around the corner. That is the point.

Both are qualified to cook the food they serve.


Yes, and the quality is the key here. The quality is different.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Posts: 1302
Location: San Francisco, CA
pueraeternus wrote:
It does not matter if all one wants to do is simple cooking. But that is totally different to saying that a chef at a Michellin star restaurant is the same as the cook at Brooklyn Diner around the corner. That is the point.


This is a bad analogy. The Arahant is working at the Michellin star joint.


Last edited by deepbluehum on Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
pueraeternus wrote:
Yes, and the quality is the key here. The quality is different.

But that is irrelevant. Are we restaurant critics or aspiring cooks?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
deepbluehum wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
matchless ability to turn the Dharma...


It is matchless. Whatever skills Buddha had, they were had by developing the same faculty of wisdom.


Buddhas develop the faculty to a depth that no Arhats can match. And since Arhats reach the stage of no more learning before they even get further, their various faculties are inferior to the Buddhas. The only thing they have in common is that they are freed from samsaric rebirth.

deepbluehum wrote:
There's nothing missing in the teachings. So it's not useless word play if you haven't established your point.


You talk just like Tilt and block off all other information. There is nothing more I can say to you if you refuse to even come up with a proper counter.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
deepbluehum wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
It does not matter if all one wants to do is simple cooking. But that is totally different to saying that a chef at a Michellin star restaurant is the same as the cook at Brooklyn Diner around the corner. That is the point.


This is a bad analogy. The Arahant is working at the Michellin star joint.


That is what you think. All I and others here have said can be simply drawn from the Pali suttas.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
dharmagoat wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
Yes, and the quality is the key here. The quality is different.

But that is irrelevant. Are we restaurant critics or aspiring cooks?


It is relevant if one is comparing the two.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Posts: 1302
Location: San Francisco, CA
pueraeternus wrote:
Buddhas develop the faculty to a depth that no Arhats can match. And since Arhats reach the stage of no more learning before they even get further, their various faculties are inferior to the Buddhas.


So you think you reach a limit in dharma where, once you cross this line, you freeze? But obviously you have some Mahayanist in mind who matches the Buddha?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Posts: 1302
Location: San Francisco, CA
pueraeternus wrote:
You talk just like Tilt and block off all other information. There is nothing more I can say to you if you refuse to even come up with a proper counter.


What you don't get is that you haven't come up with a proper counter. I mentioned Maha-moggallana who had the faculties Buddha had.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Posts: 1302
Location: San Francisco, CA
You can see in today's time many Theravadins who have published vast amounts of literature on dharma. They are not limited in their ability to expound on the dharma.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:05 am
Posts: 1302
Location: San Francisco, CA
pueraeternus wrote:
deepbluehum wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
It does not matter if all one wants to do is simple cooking. But that is totally different to saying that a chef at a Michellin star restaurant is the same as the cook at Brooklyn Diner around the corner. That is the point.


This is a bad analogy. The Arahant is working at the Michellin star joint.


That is what you think. All I and others here have said can be simply drawn from the Pali suttas.


Fail.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
pueraeternus wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
Yes, and the quality is the key here. The quality is different.

But that is irrelevant. Are we restaurant critics or aspiring cooks?

It is relevant if one is comparing the two.

There's the pitfall. A skilfully boiled egg is the same no matter who prepares it. While one is learning the basics of cooking, it makes no difference whether one's tutor works in a diner or a high class restaurant.

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
deepbluehum wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
Buddhas develop the faculty to a depth that no Arhats can match. And since Arhats reach the stage of no more learning before they even get further, their various faculties are inferior to the Buddhas.


So you think you reach a limit in dharma where, once you cross this line, you freeze? But obviously you have some Mahayanist in mind who matches the Buddha?


Obviously? What is obvious is that you do not know enough about the suttas, pick and choose those you like and come up with your pet theory (granted, you seem to have just followed whatever Tilt said and it is really his theory). Even when presented with sutric citations you don't come up with a proper counter.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
deepbluehum wrote:
pueraeternus wrote:
You talk just like Tilt and block off all other information. There is nothing more I can say to you if you refuse to even come up with a proper counter.


What you don't get is that you haven't come up with a proper counter. I mentioned Maha-moggallana who had the faculties Buddha had.


And I countered that Shariputra had those powers too - so your counter is moot.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Posts: 805
dharmagoat wrote:
There's the pitfall. A skilfully boiled egg is the same no matter who prepares it. While one is learning the basics of cooking, it makes no difference whether one's tutor works in a diner or a high class restaurant.


But it is not the basics that we are talking about here. We are talking about people aspiring to be a great chef.

_________________
If you believe certain words, you believe their hidden arguments. When you believe something is right or wrong, true of false, you believe the assumptions in the words which express the arguments. Such assumptions are often full of holes, but remain most precious to the convinced.

- The Open-Ended Proof from The Panoplia Prophetica


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
pueraeternus wrote:
dharmagoat wrote:
There's the pitfall. A skilfully boiled egg is the same no matter who prepares it. While one is learning the basics of cooking, it makes no difference whether one's tutor works in a diner or a high class restaurant.

But it is not the basics that we are talking about here. We are talking about people aspiring to be a great chef.

Are we? What if they are better suited to working in a diner? What if working in a diner provides valuable work experience for someone aspiring to be a great chef? Anyway, why are diner chefs not to be considered great chefs?

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 1106
deepbluehum wrote:
The suttas that Tiltbilings cites in his thread refutes these commentarial threads.

I'm not so sure that they do, but that really wasn't the point of my reply. The point was that the Mahāyāna conceptions of bodhi developed in the same general historical milieu as the Theravāda commentaries. In that thought-world the ideas regarding the omniscience of a buddha and samyaksaṃbodhi of a buddha being superior to that of an arhat were ubiquitous and uncontested.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group