If there is someone living that you respect and have faith in their teachings, don't let distance become an obstacle. Personal contact doesn't necessarily mean fact-to-face contact. Open a dialog with the teacher through mail, email, or phone conversation. If you make a sincere effort at contact, doors will open in some way.Jyoti wrote:pueraeternus wrote: ...In my case, the teacher that I wish to learn directly is either passed away, or is living too far from me, or is someone who has many students which make personal contact difficult. ...
Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
By confusion I don't refer to myself, but I see N.N. need to spend all the time and effort in every seating just to clarity the provisional means showed that such means is more impediment than aid the understanding. I can understand those explanation, but it is not necessary to explain anything if the provisional means is not introduce in the first place. The idea is very simply, if you don't introduce a concealed intent, you don't need to explained what is being concealed. Or if there is no symbol being utilize, there is no need to unveil the meaning of a symbol. If words literally points to the content, it serves communication of the contents directly. This is the virtue of direct approach.Malcolm wrote: This statement indicates that a) you do not understand the teachings of Chogyal Namkhai Norbu b) that you do not understand Dzogchen.
This one is definitive, since it contained the elements required for direct and definitive approach. Such a scripture does not advocate the gradual approach even if it cover the details of such approaches, since the lower always support what is above it, never the reverse. Although those of the gradual vehicle can rely on it, it didn't meant the scripture is thereby limited to the gradual vehicle.There are a number of Yogacara sutras. Also for example the Saṃdhinirmocana is a gradualist sūtra belonging to the so called vijñaptimatra or cittamatra school -- a foundational text, actually.
Also note that not all mahayana contents are definitive, which is why the four reliances has being stated in the mahayana.
Last edited by Jyoti on Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- pueraeternus
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Well, in this case you are still only relying on the word, since you are reading off from texts and trying to reconcile it within yourself. If your 慧根 is strong, then perhaps you can proceed quite far, but in the end, to get the definite meaning, you still need a living teacher. Even Huineng, who gained his initial awakening from a single stanza of the Diamond Sutra, still needs mind to mind transmission from Hongren to complete his understanding.Jyoti wrote: Teacher that one considered good is usually one whose book one has read, and has unanswered questions that he wish to learn more from the teacher. In my case, the teacher that I wish to learn directly is either passed away, or is living too far from me, or is someone who has many students which make personal contact difficult. On the other hand, what I have learnt is understanding can only be attained by oneself through self-analysis, and doubt can only be dispel after one is satisfied with the reasoning and experience in practice. So the most one benefit from the teacher is when one really has a question that one cannot answer for oneself by any means, but I never encounter a time when I'm unable to arrive at the answer myself. Maybe for others who has difficulty in this area, having a teacher is beneficial. In my case, if I went the route of follow teacher, I would have lost the time better spend at practice or try to master more standard terminologies of buddhism through the reading of the mahayana tripitaka, or mastering the technicalities of dharma through reading the commentaries of consciousness-only.
Unless perhaps you made a resolve to gain Pratyekabodhi in a past life, but even then, only in the last life would a lone dwelling Pratyekabuddha not need any tutelege.
Dzogchen is tantra, hence you can't really do this without transmission and a guru. You don't have to always bug the guru, especially since you think you can resolve most issues yourself.
"Men must want to do things out of their own innermost drives. People, not commercial organizations or chains of command, are what make great civilizations work. Every civilization depends upon the quality of the individuals it produces. If you over-organize humans, over-legalize them, suppress their urge to greatness - they cannot work and their civilization collapses."
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Relying on the meaning does not mean not reading any texts, but it mean one does not take the word literally, but the meaning that is being communicated, so sometime when they are error in the usage of words, the meaning is still clear. As for the assumption that the definitive meaning required a living teacher, I like to believe it, but being the exception myself, I had to be honest to admit that a living teacher is not necessary, and speaking in term of definitive meaning, the living teacher is not outside, what is outside can never be 'lived', what is living has to be on one's own side.pueraeternus wrote: Well, in this case you are still only relying on the word, since you are reading off from texts and trying to reconcile it within yourself. If your 慧根 is strong, then perhaps you can proceed quite far, but in the end, to get the definite meaning, you still need a living teacher. Even Huineng, who gained his initial awakening from a single stanza of the Diamond Sutra, still needs mind to mind transmission from Hongren to complete his understanding.
The stage of Pratyekabodhi impede, not promote the bodhisattva's development.Unless perhaps you made a resolve to gain Pratyekabodhi in a past life, but even then, only in the last life would a lone dwelling Pratyekabuddha not need any tutelege.
Dzogchen is tantra, hence you can't really do this without transmission and a guru. You don't have to always bug the guru, especially since you think you can resolve most issues yourself.
Indeed if dzogchen is only the skillfull means of tantra, the tradition demand a guru. But I'm not interested in skillful means, as for the definitive meaning of dzogchen, I can find it in ch'an and the consciousness-only school, and they don't required any teacher. One cannot concealed knowledge if the knowledge is true (definitive), as paper cannot be used to cover fire (a chinese saying).
- pueraeternus
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
That is not the meaning of the four reliances. Words cannot communicate the full meaning, hence a living teacher is important. If you think you are exceptionally high calibre, then, well, good for you if it is true and I have nothing to say to that.Jyoti wrote: Relying on the meaning does not mean not reading any texts, but it mean one does not take the word literally, but the meaning that is being communicated, so sometime when they are error in the usage of words, the meaning is still clear. As for the assumption that the definitive meaning required a living teacher, I like to believe it, but being the exception myself, I had to be honest to admit that a living teacher is not necessary, and speaking in term of definitive meaning, the living teacher is not outside, what is outside can never be 'lived', what is living has to be on one's own side.
Which is sort of my point..The stage of Pratyekabodhi impede, not promote the bodhisattva's development.
They do require a teacher at some point. Your notion of chan and yogacara soteriology is unusual to say the least.Indeed if dzogchen is only the skillfull means of tantra, the tradition demand a guru. But I'm not interested in skillful means, as for the definitive meaning of dzogchen, I can find it in ch'an and the consciousness-only school, and they don't required any teacher. One cannot concealed knowledge if the knowledge is true (definitive), as paper cannot be used to cover fire (a chinese saying).
"Men must want to do things out of their own innermost drives. People, not commercial organizations or chains of command, are what make great civilizations work. Every civilization depends upon the quality of the individuals it produces. If you over-organize humans, over-legalize them, suppress their urge to greatness - they cannot work and their civilization collapses."
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
- pueraeternus
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
纸包不住火? It's funny how you use that. The usage of the phrase is usually in the context that a scandal cannot be hidden for long.Jyoti wrote:as paper cannot be used to cover fire (a chinese saying).
"Men must want to do things out of their own innermost drives. People, not commercial organizations or chains of command, are what make great civilizations work. Every civilization depends upon the quality of the individuals it produces. If you over-organize humans, over-legalize them, suppress their urge to greatness - they cannot work and their civilization collapses."
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
N.N.Malcolm wrote: From whom did you receive Dzogchen transmission?
Teacher and Guru -- not the same thing at all.
Dzogchen is not based on questions and answers. It is based on experience.
Depend on how you interpret those terms, essentially guru is in sanskrit, the meaning is teacher. You cannot change the meaning of the same word based on differences of language.
Experience is required, questions and answers are what appears when one analyse the words of the teacher or scriptures. You need a question, in order to find answer within experience. If one restrains the questions within, they will come up later, and then one will be unable to cope with them and doubt will arise. Unless one is content with faith, but that is not having the meaning.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
The four reliances were stated in definitive scriptures, they were not meant to be interpreted but to be read literally. Words is the means of meaning, viz. meaning has its means of communication, it is definitely possible to communicate the meaning. Thus we have the definitive scriptures which function is just this. What a teacher can do directly is also with words, a speaking words are no different to written words in term of being the means of the meaning. In the era of information, the teachers would be more efficiently communicate through electronics medium, such medium would be the means of the meaning. If one still insist the a teacher must talk to the student face to face, that clearly demonstrate ignorance of the fact the meaning has its means of communication, where direct face to face is only one of the many possible ways.pueraeternus wrote: That is not the meaning of the four reliances. Words cannot communicate the full meaning, hence a living teacher is important. If you think you are exceptionally high calibre, then, well, good for you if it is true and I have nothing to say to that.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Jyoti, the so called "definitive scriptures" of Mahayana are irrelavant to Dzogchen. Dzogchen has its own root texts and does not depend on the Mahayana.
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
- Shabkar
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Meaning comes from experience.Jyoti wrote:
Experience is required, questions and answers are what appears when one analyse the words of the teacher or scriptures. You need a question, in order to find answer within experience.
You don't really need to ask that many questions about it.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
The body of buddhism is the same both in mahayana and dzogchen.Pero wrote:Jyoti, the so called "definitive scriptures" of Mahayana are irrelavant to Dzogchen. Dzogchen has its own root texts and does not depend on the Mahayana.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
What does body of Buddhism mean?Jyoti wrote:The body of buddhism is the same both in mahayana and dzogchen.Pero wrote:Jyoti, the so called "definitive scriptures" of Mahayana are irrelavant to Dzogchen. Dzogchen has its own root texts and does not depend on the Mahayana.
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
- Shabkar
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
No, this is a mistake. But it is your mistake so I leave you to it.Jyoti wrote:... as for the definitive meaning of dzogchen, I can find it in ch'an and the consciousness-only school...
Neither Chan nor Cittamatra go beyond mind.
M
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Unless one can attained certainty, otherwise, it is all based on faith. Meaning can comes from experience, but if your meaning cannot be uphold outside of familiar experience, it has no function. The only benefit of such experience is calm and you have the faith to maintain it. Buddhism is all on the side of function.Malcolm wrote: Meaning comes from experience.
You don't really need to ask that many questions about it.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Defined mind, otherwise don't simply go beyond because a tradition said so. Both ch'an and the consciousness-only tradition focused only on consciousnesses and its transformation.Malcolm wrote:No, this is a mistake. But it is your mistake so I leave you to it.Jyoti wrote:... as for the definitive meaning of dzogchen, I can find it in ch'an and the consciousness-only school...
Neither Chan nor Cittamatra go beyond mind.
M
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Jyoti, what do you think bodhicitta means within Dzogchen. What does it mean and what is it's role if any?
The Blessed One said:
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
"What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range." Sabba Sutta.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
The dharmakaya, dhamadhatu, nirvana and so forth. Unless the body is different, nothing is irrelevant with both traditions.Pero wrote:What does body of Buddhism mean?Jyoti wrote:The body of buddhism is the same both in mahayana and dzogchen.Pero wrote:Jyoti, the so called "definitive scriptures" of Mahayana are irrelavant to Dzogchen. Dzogchen has its own root texts and does not depend on the Mahayana.
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Right, as I said, Dzogchen has nothing to do with mind, vijñāna.Jyoti wrote:Defined mind, otherwise don't simply go beyond because a tradition said so. Both ch'an and the consciousness-only tradition focused only on consciousnesses and its transformation.Malcolm wrote:No, this is a mistake. But it is your mistake so I leave you to it.Jyoti wrote:... as for the definitive meaning of dzogchen, I can find it in ch'an and the consciousness-only school...
Neither Chan nor Cittamatra go beyond mind.
M
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Sure it is. You don't have to read even one sutra to practice Dzogchen and even if you do, it will not help your understanding of Dzogchen. You can't understand Dzogchen by trying to look at it from the POV of a lower vehicle.Jyoti wrote:The dharmakaya, dhamadhatu, nirvana and so forth. Unless the body is different, nothing is irrelevant with both traditions.Pero wrote:What does body of Buddhism mean?Jyoti wrote: The body of buddhism is the same both in mahayana and dzogchen.
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
- Shabkar
- pueraeternus
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:10 pm
Re: Dzogchen tantras uncreated and eternal
Chan does not stop at the vijnana level.Malcolm wrote:Right, as I said, Dzogchen has nothing to do with mind, vijñāna.Jyoti wrote:Defined mind, otherwise don't simply go beyond because a tradition said so. Both ch'an and the consciousness-only tradition focused only on consciousnesses and its transformation.Malcolm wrote:
No, this is a mistake. But it is your mistake so I leave you to it.
Neither Chan nor Cittamatra go beyond mind.
M
"Men must want to do things out of their own innermost drives. People, not commercial organizations or chains of command, are what make great civilizations work. Every civilization depends upon the quality of the individuals it produces. If you over-organize humans, over-legalize them, suppress their urge to greatness - they cannot work and their civilization collapses."
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher
- A letter to CHOAM, attributed to the Preacher