Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:53 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 34
termite wrote:
dave wrote:
The principal mind-stream which is in constant change from one moment to the next, is never different nor is it the same.


I don't think you can separate "change" from "time." What you're calling "mind-stream," it seems to me, is nothing other than the manifestation of time itself. Time is inseparable from this mind. The "next moment" is co-created with the mind that perceives it.


No nature is a necessary factor for change to happen.
Mind knows, time can not know, it is not aware (knowing) without mind.
Time is the illusion of mind.
Because mind has no nature, (empty) every change can take place.
So time is no basis for nature.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
dave wrote:
termite wrote:
dave wrote:
The principal mind-stream which is in constant change from one moment to the next, is never different nor is it the same.


I don't think you can separate "change" from "time." What you're calling "mind-stream," it seems to me, is nothing other than the manifestation of time itself. Time is inseparable from this mind. The "next moment" is co-created with the mind that perceives it.


No nature is a necessary factor for change to happen.
Mind knows, time can not know, it is not aware (knowing) without mind.
Time is the illusion of mind.
Because mind has no nature, (empty) every change can take place.
So time is no basis for nature.


If mind is seen as a "stream," then there's time involved; I was pointing at "change." Mind is impermanent, or there would be no change. Other than that, considering that we agree that mind is empty, there's no "there" there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
:namaste: Friend Termite! Hello there! How are you changing?

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 34
Hi Termite
What is change in connection with time?
First show us mind and then time.
If you are able to do so, we can discuss change and time in mind.

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
dave wrote:
Hi Termite
What is change in connection with time?


Huh? Change is impossible if there is no time. Time is unmeasurable if there is no change. Change is seen, isn't it? Time can't be separated from experience. It's not an "illusion"; it's the unfolding process.

Quote:
First show us mind and then time.
If you are able to do so, we can discuss change and time in mind.


The request doesn't make sense; it shows that you didn't understand what I posted.

How can one show "then" time, as if time followed from something "previous"? "Previous" is time, as is "subsequent."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
muni wrote:
:namaste: Friend Termite! Hello there! How are you changing?


Grayer on top, slower of foot. :rolling:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
:smile:

No illusion. Unchanging continuum.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 34
termite wrote:
dave wrote:
Hi Termite
What is change in connection with time?


Huh? Change is impossible if there is no time. Time is unmeasurable if there is no change. Change is seen, isn't it? Time can't be separated from experience. It's not an "illusion"; it's the unfolding process.

Quote:
First show us mind and then time.
If you are able to do so, we can discuss change and time in mind.


The request doesn't make sense; it shows that you didn't understand what I posted.

How can one show "then" time, as if time followed from something "previous"? "Previous" is time, as is "subsequent."



Same I can say about you.
You have not understood what I have posted.
The topic is too advanced.
Termite, I will not disclose all aspects I could contribute to this topic.
My suggestion for you, study with a learned Kenpo, or Geshe or with your lama, some shastras, and get familiar with Tibetan Logic, Epistemology, Cittamatra text, Madyamaka and more....
This topic needs really more knowledge in order to be able to grasp all ins and outs.
There is no need to continual this discussion.
Best wishes, Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:55 am
Posts: 453
"Suppose compounded phenomena cycle:
If they are permanent, they do not cycle.
Even if they are impermanent, they do not cycle.
The same approach applies to sentient beings.

Suppose the person cycles:
Since when sought in the fivefold way
In the aggregates and in the sense spheres and in the elements,
He is not there, what cycles?"

Nagarjuna, Chapter XVI, Mulamadhyamakakarika


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
mudra wrote:
"Suppose compounded phenomena cycle:
If they are permanent, they do not cycle.
Even if they are impermanent, they do not cycle.
The same approach applies to sentient beings.

Suppose the person cycles:
Since when sought in the fivefold way
In the aggregates and in the sense spheres and in the elements,
He is not there, what cycles?"

Nagarjuna, Chapter XVI, Mulamadhyamakakarika


In ultimate reality there is no person that transmigrates from life to life, but conventionally rebirth is real.

Quoting what you have isn't necessarily valuable to demonstrating the validity of rebirth.

It might be better to look at Abhidharma literature.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:55 am
Posts: 453
Huseng wrote:

In ultimate reality there is no person that transmigrates from life to life, but conventionally rebirth is real.

Quoting what you have isn't necessarily valuable to demonstrating the validity of rebirth.

It might be better to look at Abhidharma literature.


What was quoted was in response to a few posts ago discussing 'what gets reborn". It doesn't negate conventional reality. It just puts it into perspective.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
dave wrote:
The topic is too advanced.
...
There is no need to continual this discussion.


The topic is "advanced" because it is filled with a lot of hoo-ha. When the hoo-ha is dropped, it becomes a lot simpler. My suggestion for you is to sit. :)

Absent time, the discussion has never "continued" at all. It would not have come to this. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
muni wrote:
:smile:

No illusion. Unchanging continuum.


We can go with that one. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 589
Quote:
:smile:

No illusion. Unchanging continuum
.

no no illusion. no unchanging continuum... yes?

_________________
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
Wouldn't want to leave out our old friend "Changing Continuum," either. :rolling:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:18 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Posts: 2995
Location: British Columbia
termite wrote:
Wouldn't want to leave out our old friend "Changing Continuum," either. :rolling:



Well geez, then we can't leave out "Changing Discontinuum" either!

_________________
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
His Holiness Sakya Trizin: "We leave the body for unknown destination and take so many care of this body while mind remains under the control of defilements".

Mindfulness helps us right now to take care regarding rebirth. So great. :twothumbsup:

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
catmoon wrote:
termite wrote:
Wouldn't want to leave out our old friend "Changing Continuum," either. :rolling:



Well geez, then we can't leave out "Changing Discontinuum" either!


Yeah, but I'm not going to buy "Unchanging Discontinuum." :jumping:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 589
:namaste: termite that white beards getting long!

why not 'unchanging discontinuum'?

it still remains the same. nothing ever continues unchanged.

you going to take a shot at my pot?

_________________
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 58
White Lotus wrote:
:namaste: termite that white beards getting long!


:sage:

Quote:
why not 'unchanging discontinuum'?

it still remains the same. nothing ever continues unchanged.

you going to take a shot at my pot?


Because I have a problem digesting the notion that if a thing discontinues, it remains unchanged. My problem, not yours, I'm sure... :thinking:

...

On second thought, we've surely been down this road before, so OK.

:rolling:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], conebeckham, Dan74, Inge, yan kong and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group