circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
- Wesley1982
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
- Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
I think there are often times in conversations and relationships where we resort to circular reasoning and repetitive logic. What are some ways to work around that? thanks.
- DarwidHalim
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:04 pm
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
For example?
I am not here nor there.
I am not right nor wrong.
I do not exist neither non-exist.
I am not I nor non-I.
I am not in samsara nor nirvana.
To All Buddhas, I bow down for the teaching of emptiness. Thank You!
I am not right nor wrong.
I do not exist neither non-exist.
I am not I nor non-I.
I am not in samsara nor nirvana.
To All Buddhas, I bow down for the teaching of emptiness. Thank You!
- Wesley1982
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
- Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
ok,
a) assuming something is true
b) assuming something else is true because of that
c) X must be the reason for Y
d) repeat in a circular manner
a) assuming something is true
b) assuming something else is true because of that
c) X must be the reason for Y
d) repeat in a circular manner
- DarwidHalim
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:04 pm
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
Sorry, I don't get it.
I need a story with circular reasoning.
I need a story with circular reasoning.
I am not here nor there.
I am not right nor wrong.
I do not exist neither non-exist.
I am not I nor non-I.
I am not in samsara nor nirvana.
To All Buddhas, I bow down for the teaching of emptiness. Thank You!
I am not right nor wrong.
I do not exist neither non-exist.
I am not I nor non-I.
I am not in samsara nor nirvana.
To All Buddhas, I bow down for the teaching of emptiness. Thank You!
- Wesley1982
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
- Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
assuming something is true because of naiv'ete?
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
I think there are often times in conversations and relationships where we resort to circular reasoning and repetitive logic.
Uh huh like...
Wesley has a beard
Therefore Wesley is beardy
Shave...What are some ways to work around that? thanks.
- Wesley1982
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
- Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
Ok, done all shaved.plwk wrote:I think there are often times in conversations and relationships where we resort to circular reasoning and repetitive logic.
Uh huh like...
Wesley has a beard
Therefore Wesley is beardyShave...What are some ways to work around that? thanks.
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
Circular reasoning can be easily recognized by careful introspection.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
- Quiet Heart
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:57 am
- Location: Bangkok Thailand
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
DarwidHalim wrote:For example?
As in.....why I can't be a "real" Buddhist here in Thailand.
As for example....what is a real Buddhists?
My Thai wife told me:
There are real Buddhists living here in Thailand.
They are monks, wear monks robes, and are not married.
Many of them speak Thai.
I do not speak Thai.
I am not a monk, I do not wear monks robes, and I am married.
Therefore I can not be a real Buddhist
Buddhists understand Buddhisim and their opinion is taken as of high value when they speak about Buddhism.
Therefore, since as was shown above, I can not be a real Buddhist, my opinion on anything Buddhist is of no value.
Shame on you Shakyamuni for setting the precedent of leaving home.
Did you think it was not there--
in your wife's lovely face
in your baby's laughter?
Did you think you had to go elsewhere (simply) to find it?
from - Judyth Collin
The Layman's Lament
From What Book, 1998, p. 52
Edited by Gary Gach
Did you think it was not there--
in your wife's lovely face
in your baby's laughter?
Did you think you had to go elsewhere (simply) to find it?
from - Judyth Collin
The Layman's Lament
From What Book, 1998, p. 52
Edited by Gary Gach
- Challenge23
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:36 pm
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
An example of circular logic from Erik the Viking.
Much like in the example, the best way to defeat a circular argument is to call it what it is and refuse to accept it. Once someone realizes they are using a circular argument then they hopefully will stop using it. Either that or acknowledge that a root premise of the argument is faith based.ERIK Well it just seems a little bit crude, that's all.
HELGA What about the killing and looting? That's just as crude, isn't
it?
ERIK Oh well - you've GOT to do them.
HELGA Why? Why have you got to go round killing and looting?
ERIK To pay for the next expedition, of course.
HELGA But that's a circular argument! If the only reason for going on
an expedition is the killing and looting and the only reason
for the killing and looting is to pay for the next expedition,
they cancel each other out.
IN THIS BOOK IT IS SPOKEN OF THE SEPHIROTH & THE PATHS, OF SPIRITS & CONJURATIONS, OF GODS, SPHERES, PLANES & MANY OTHER THINGS WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST. IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER THEY EXIST OR NOT. BY DOING CERTAIN THINGS CERTAIN RESULTS FOLLOW; STUDENTS ARE MOST EARNESTLY WARNED AGAINST ATTRIBUTING OBJECTIVE REALITY OR PHILOSOPHICAL VALIDITY TO ANY OF THEM.
Wagner, Eric; Wilson, Robert Anton (2004-12-01). An Insider's Guide to Robert Anton Wilson (Kindle Locations 1626-1629). New Falcon Publications. Kindle Edition., quoting from Alister Crowley
Wagner, Eric; Wilson, Robert Anton (2004-12-01). An Insider's Guide to Robert Anton Wilson (Kindle Locations 1626-1629). New Falcon Publications. Kindle Edition., quoting from Alister Crowley
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
It is widely recognized that a circular argument proves nothing. It is less widely recognized that if any of the statements in a circular argument can be proven independently, then all the statements in the circular argument are proven as well.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
Circular arguments prove nothing. Look for proof that sounds something like "it is because it is."
Pointing out circular arguments that prove nothing: (grub byed grub bya dang mtshung pas ma grub pa). A circular argument arises when the proof that the opponent is trying to use is the same as what he needs to prove. In other words, the proof is not yet proven, so it cannot be used as the basis of deriving another proof. For example, it would be like saying, “this is a head because it is a head”. This is a big mistake, but it is common for many philosophers to make it.--
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche – Madhyamakavatara – 1996 Chapter 6 – 85
Shaun
Pointing out circular arguments that prove nothing: (grub byed grub bya dang mtshung pas ma grub pa). A circular argument arises when the proof that the opponent is trying to use is the same as what he needs to prove. In other words, the proof is not yet proven, so it cannot be used as the basis of deriving another proof. For example, it would be like saying, “this is a head because it is a head”. This is a big mistake, but it is common for many philosophers to make it.--
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche – Madhyamakavatara – 1996 Chapter 6 – 85
Shaun
Re: circular reasoning ~ how do we recognize it?
Circular reasoning is not always so simple as that.
If you have a series of statements like
If A then B;
If B then C;
If C then D;
If D then A;
What you have is a circular argument. The examples given above are merely tautologies, the trivial case of a circular argument.
By itself the circular argument proves nothing. However, if one of its elements can be proven, the rest all follow too.
A tautology could be framed as
If A then A;
and it also conforms to the general rule in that if A can be proved it must be true, and then all the statements in the argument are true. However, like the more general case, the circular argument by itself proves nothing. It requires external proof of at least one of its statements.
If you have a series of statements like
If A then B;
If B then C;
If C then D;
If D then A;
What you have is a circular argument. The examples given above are merely tautologies, the trivial case of a circular argument.
By itself the circular argument proves nothing. However, if one of its elements can be proven, the rest all follow too.
A tautology could be framed as
If A then A;
and it also conforms to the general rule in that if A can be proved it must be true, and then all the statements in the argument are true. However, like the more general case, the circular argument by itself proves nothing. It requires external proof of at least one of its statements.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.