underthetree wrote:It's tricky.
Personally I don't believe in, say, nagas, because they seem culturally specific to a place quite distant from my own - I wouldn't expect a Tibetan to believe in pixies, by the same token. I don't find that the Buddhist cosmology (in terms of ghosts and demons) has much relevance to me here in the UK. I do, however, believe that when Tibetans talk about 'devas' they are touching on the same thing that an old Devonian might mean by 'pixie.' So yes, I do believe in the (usually) unseen presence of the supernatural, woven into our experience of the everyday, but that's about as specific as I dare to be. Before meditating in certain places I will make an offering to the powers of that particular spot. Not based on any New Age or spiritual philosophy, but just on how things feel, based on a lifetime of spending a lot of time alone in the deep countryside. Hedging my bets? Of course. But...
underthetree wrote:...Having said all that, I live next to a river and it certainly has its own energy. So I think I do partly understand what might be meant by 'naga,' and why it might be important to pay attention to such things. The same with hungry ghosts. I don't believe in beings with swollen bellies and matchstick necks but I suspect that human imprints of misery, frustration and envy do linger in some way. Most of the hungry ghosts I know are alive. I sometimes suspect I might be one of them.
LastLegend wrote:If enlightenment is possible, why are spirits not possible?
dharmagoat wrote:Believing in such things gives them existence. It really is that simple.
Blue Garuda wrote:dharmagoat wrote:Believing in such things gives them existence. It really is that simple.
Indeed - as real as our belief in a Self.
However, the flip side of the logic is that spirits are as real as we are.
dharmagoat wrote:Blue Garuda wrote:dharmagoat wrote:Believing in such things gives them existence. It really is that simple.
Indeed - as real as our belief in a Self.
However, the flip side of the logic is that spirits are as real as we are.
Or that we are the spirits.
Blue Garuda wrote:dharmagoat wrote:Blue Garuda wrote:However, the flip side of the logic is that spirits are as real as we are.
Or that we are the spirits.
Indeed. To the spirits we may indeed appear to be the phantasms.
dharmagoat wrote:Blue Garuda wrote:Indeed. To the spirits we may indeed appear to be the phantasms.
Phantasms perceiving phantasms?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests