Dzochenpa Census

Anything goes (almost).

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Sherab Dorje » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:12 pm

Yes, you are right! Institutional Buddhism will never be the same again. The death knell has sounded. All praise the new king! etc... ad nauseum...
:namaste:
"When one is not in accord with the true view
Meditation and conduct become delusion,
One will not attain the real result
One will be like a blind man who has no eyes."
Naropa - Summary of the View from The Eight Doha Treasures
User avatar
Sherab Dorje
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 9635
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:52 pm

Simon E. wrote:That particular body of water will not be back as a discrete entity I suspect.


That's what happens when you can't get a boy to stick his finger into a dyke.

:woohoo:
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Simon E. » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:01 pm

I expect the dyke is relieved.
Simon E.
 
Posts: 2543
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:10 pm

Simon E. wrote:I expect the dyke is relieved.


LOL :)

Karma Vipaka has no limits so who know where the flow may take us all?

Sometimes a pebble drops into the water and creates ripples of gentle movement, at other times there is a flood and millions of pebbles are washed to another place.

One or two pebbles here have caused a ripple, but you'd think it was a full blown tsunami. :)
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Tara » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:12 pm

Um sorry to be a party pooper but...

:focus: Dzochenpa Census
It's not a competition. It's a choice.
Tara
User avatar
Tara
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am
Location: Who cares!

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:18 pm

OK :)

Is there any evidence that any DW members who were Buddhists practising Dzogchen before the growth of the DC presence here, are now no longer Buddhists?
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Simon E. » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:24 pm

I was a long term Buddhist ...nearly thirty years.
I neither reject or accept that term for myself now.

I did not grow jaded. Just grew away. I do not urge anyone else to follow my example.
Simon E.
 
Posts: 2543
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Sönam » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:39 pm

This discussion on being bouddhist or not when practicing dzogchen is nearly ridiculous ... for any reason some have exagerated the sense of it.

What one can say is that from the pov of our real nature, where you come from is of no importance ... therefore buddhist or non buddhist is of no importance, but this is from the pov of our real nature.

Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
User avatar
Sönam
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:45 pm

Simon E. wrote:I was a long term Buddhist ...nearly thirty years.
I neither reject or accept that term for myself now.

I did not grow jaded. Just grew away. I do not urge anyone else to follow my example.



I guess the fundamental change must be one of Refuge.

After all, we may fit the requirements of many faiths through meeting behavioural expectations, but ultimately it is Refuge which identifies our specific faith.

Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.

Is that a fair way to assess a change away from the label of 'Buddhist' ?
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:51 pm

Sönam wrote:This discussion on being bouddhist or not when practicing dzogchen is nearly ridiculous ... for any reason some have exagerated the sense of it.

What one can say is that from the pov of our real nature, where you come from is of no importance ... therefore buddhist or non buddhist is of no importance, but this is from the pov of our real nature.

Sönam


I think it is fair to ask, as this thread is in the Lounge and so we don't have to view this from a Dzogchen or ChNNR perspective.

The assertion you make that 'Buddhist or non Buddhist is of no importance' expresses precisely the view that Buddhists here may wish to adopt and drop their 'Buddhist' label. I'm curious to know how many have been affected by that view and have dropped their 'Buddhist' label and how many feel no need to do so.
I agree, there is no need to do so.

This is a Buddhist forum so there is no problem, surely, in asking others if they have changed from that view. :shrug:
Last edited by Blue Garuda on Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Virgo » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:54 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.


I take refuge in my real nature. This goes beyond, "Buddhist" or "Non-Buddhist".

Kevin
User avatar
Virgo
 
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:47 am
Location: Globe

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:01 pm

Virgo wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.


I take refuge in my real nature. This goes beyond, "Buddhist" or "Non-Buddhist".

Kevin


That's not the question I was posing. I wanted to know how many no longer consider themselves Buddhists. To answer that Dzogchen is beyond such distinctions has been aired here very often, but isn't what I was asking.

It's a simple question, surely. The two answers could be paraphrased as:

Buddhist before encountering Dzogchen, Buddhist afterwards.

Buddhist before encountering Dzogchen teachings, no longer Buddhist.
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Sönam » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:03 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:
Sönam wrote:This discussion on being bouddhist or not when practicing dzogchen is nearly ridiculous ... for any reason some have exagerated the sense of it.

What one can say is that from the pov of our real nature, where you come from is of no importance ... therefore buddhist or non buddhist is of no importance, but this is from the pov of our real nature.

Sönam


I think it is fair to ask, as this thread is in the Lounge and so we don't have to view this from a Dzogchen or ChNNR perspective.

The assertion you make that 'Buddhist or non Buddhist is of no importance' expresses precisely the view that Buddhists here may wish to adopt and drop their 'Buddhist' label. I'm curious to know how many have been affected by that view and have dropped their 'Buddhist' label and how many feel no need to do so.


No one would really disagree with: "from the pov of our real nature, where you come from is of no importance ... therefore Buddhist or non Buddhist is of no importance." It does not mean that one has to drop any Buddhist labelling. Nor it does not mean that one has to not practice Buddhism.

Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
User avatar
Sönam
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Sönam » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:06 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:
Virgo wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.


I take refuge in my real nature. This goes beyond, "Buddhist" or "Non-Buddhist".

Kevin


That's not the question I was posing. I wanted to know how many no longer consider themselves Buddhists. To answer that Dzogchen is beyond such distinctions has been aired here very often, but isn't what I was asking.

It's a simple question, surely. The two answers could be paraphrased as:

Buddhist before encountering Dzogchen, Buddhist afterwards.

Buddhist before encountering Dzogchen teachings, no longer Buddhist.


You wanted to organize a poll :)

Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
User avatar
Sönam
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: France

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Simon E. » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:07 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:
Simon E. wrote:I was a long term Buddhist ...nearly thirty years.
I neither reject or accept that term for myself now.

I did not grow jaded. Just grew away. I do not urge anyone else to follow my example.



I guess the fundamental change must be one of Refuge.

After all, we may fit the requirements of many faiths through meeting behavioural expectations, but ultimately it is Refuge which identifies our specific faith.

Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.

Is that a fair way to assess a change away from the label of 'Buddhist' ?

What is there to take Refuge from ? Its all just stuff..
And here I am blithely typing words that once would have had me reaching for the Gun Of Buddhist Righteousness that I kept to hand..
Just to make one thing clear I did not reach this position as a result of reading Malcolm's posts.
I had already reached that position. Reading Malcolm's posts resulted in my posting to this forum.

But I am gabbling. :namaste:
Simon E.
 
Posts: 2543
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:10 pm

Sönam wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:
Sönam wrote:This discussion on being bouddhist or not when practicing dzogchen is nearly ridiculous ... for any reason some have exagerated the sense of it.

What one can say is that from the pov of our real nature, where you come from is of no importance ... therefore buddhist or non buddhist is of no importance, but this is from the pov of our real nature.

Sönam


I think it is fair to ask, as this thread is in the Lounge and so we don't have to view this from a Dzogchen or ChNNR perspective.

The assertion you make that 'Buddhist or non Buddhist is of no importance' expresses precisely the view that Buddhists here may wish to adopt and drop their 'Buddhist' label. I'm curious to know how many have been affected by that view and have dropped their 'Buddhist' label and how many feel no need to do so.


No one would really disagree with: "from the pov of our real nature, where you come from is of no importance ... therefore Buddhist or non Buddhist is of no importance." It does not mean that one has to drop any Buddhist labelling. Nor it does not mean that one has to not practice Buddhism.

Sönam




I asked whether people had abandoned the Buddhist label, not whether it was necessary.

Maybe I'm just not expressing myself clearly. I feel like I am asking if anyone changed their car lately and being answered by people pointing out that it is not necessary.
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Tara » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:15 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:I asked whether people had abandoned the Buddhist label, not whether it was necessary.

Maybe I'm just not expressing myself clearly. I feel like I am asking if anyone changed their car lately and being answered by people pointing out that it is not necessary.



:lol: glad to see someone else is having um an interesting time trying to get a message across.

:oops: no I am not glad but I cannot help laughing out loud at the moment. ..... normal service (such as it is) will be resumed shortly.

:offtopic:

:focus:

Regards,
It's not a competition. It's a choice.
Tara
User avatar
Tara
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am
Location: Who cares!

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby conebeckham » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:21 pm

Virgo wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.


I take refuge in my real nature. This goes beyond, "Buddhist" or "Non-Buddhist".

Kevin


I don't wish to be contrarian, but I must point out that "Buddhist" or "Non-Buddhist" means different things to different people--that's perhaps the most obvious "take-away" for anyone who's ever spent any time here at DW.

If one defines one's "Real Nature" as Buddha, then, perhaps, one is taking refuge in one's real nature when one is taking refuge in Buddha. I agree with My Cerulean Feathered Friend--how we define 'Buddha' makes a world of difference.

I don't think too many of us, for instance, take refuge in the organic remains of some Nepali-Prince-turned-Renunciate-turned-Awakened One who died 2500 years ago or so.....
May any merit generated by on-line discussion
Be dedicated to the Ultimate Benefit of All Sentient Beings.
User avatar
conebeckham
 
Posts: 2700
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Virgo » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:29 pm

Blue Garuda wrote:
Virgo wrote:
Blue Garuda wrote:Followers of the Dharma may take Refuge in Dharma and Sangha but the main issue is how we define 'Buddha' as an object of Refuge.


I take refuge in my real nature. This goes beyond, "Buddhist" or "Non-Buddhist".

Kevin


That's not the question I was posing. I wanted to know how many no longer consider themselves Buddhists. To answer that Dzogchen is beyond such distinctions has been aired here very often, but isn't what I was asking.

It's a simple question, surely. The two answers could be paraphrased as:

Buddhist before encountering Dzogchen, Buddhist afterwards.

Buddhist before encountering Dzogchen teachings, no longer Buddhist.

Hi BG,

I don't say "I am a Buddhist" nor do I say "I am not a Buddhist". I am not defined by those things.

Kevin
User avatar
Virgo
 
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:47 am
Location: Globe

Re: Dzochenpa Census

Postby Blue Garuda » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:37 pm

conebeckham wrote:I don't think too many of us, for instance, take refuge in the organic remains of some Nepali-Prince-turned-Renunciate-turned-Awakened One who died 2500 years ago or so.....


You mean venerating the relic Buddha finger I bought on eBay is pointless? Damn. LOL :)

The devil is in the detail, for sure.

Guruyoga comes in many forms and you could almost start at the other end and say that people who are not seeking their true nature are not Buddhists.

That would make a great thread........................not. ;)
Left
Blue Garuda
 
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

>