. . .Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
. . .Wesley1982 wrote:Does it represent magical properties?
You ask that because other magic related spiritual traditions incorporate the elements in their practices and teachings?
asunthatneversets wrote:Wesley1982 wrote:Does it represent magical properties?
Nope. You ask that because other magic related spiritual traditions incorporate the elements in their practices and teachings? In the dzogchen symbol the colors represent the elements but they also represent the 5 lights. The lights become the elements when under the influence of ignorance. Which is essentially not recognizing that the 5 lights are ones own display. Nothing to do with magic, though reality itself is said to be essentially equivalent to a magical illusion.
Wesley1982 wrote:asunthatneversets wrote:
Nope. You ask that because other magic related spiritual traditions incorporate the elements in their practices and teachings? In the dzogchen symbol the colors represent the elements but they also represent the 5 lights. The lights become the elements when under the influence of ignorance. Which is essentially not recognizing that the 5 lights are ones own display. Nothing to do with magic, though reality itself is said to be essentially equivalent to a magical illusion.
In your opinion, do we all suffer from this "magical illusion" of reality? Was it the Buddha who could see things as they really are?..
Wesley1982 wrote:ok,
In your view, what is the best 'treatment' of this universal suffering from the "magical illusion" we think of as reality?..
Wesley1982 wrote:I think if people are suffering from this "illusion" I would want to treat and possibly cure it.
Wesley1982 wrote:I think if people are suffering from this "illusion" I would want to treat and possibly cure it.
uan wrote:stop thinking about "universal suffering from the "magical illusion" we think of as reality?" What does that even mean? Those words don't mean anything. Even in a non-buddhist sense they are so so incredibly vague as to mean whatever anyone wants them to mean, so essentially they mean nothing.
What if you figure out your real nature before any transmission (that you are aware of)?Sherlock wrote:if you truly realize that it is an illusion, you are liberated. The way to realize this (in the Dzogchen teachings) is to receive the transmission, recognise your real nature, remove your doubts about it, and then continue in that state of recognition.
Wesley1982 wrote:I think if people are suffering from this "illusion" I would want to treat and possibly cure it.
Dronma wrote:
Maybe "others" do not even exist......[/color]
Rene Descartes wrote:I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is at once exceedingly potent and deceitful, has employed all his artifice to deceive me; t will suppose that the sky, the air, the earth, colors, figures, sounds, and all external things, are nothing better than the illusions of dreams, by means of which this being has laid snares for my credulity; I will consider myself as without hands, eyes, flesh, blood, or any of the senses, and as falsely believing that I am possessed of these; I will continue resolutely fixed in this belief, and if indeed by this means it be not in my power to arrive at the knowledge of truth, I shall at least do what is in my power, viz., [ suspend my judgment ], and guard with settled purpose against giving my assent to what is false, and being imposed upon by this deceiver, whatever be his power and artifice.
Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Meditation 1, paragraph 12.
Wesley1982 wrote:I don't how someone could be so self-conscious of having to take a shit.
Users browsing this forum: kirtu, tomamundsen and 8 guests