Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:03 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
gregkavarnos wrote:
Okay, I understand now! Would it then be more correct to say that the I Ching influenced Taoism and Confucianism?
:namaste:


Yeah, something like that. The Yi Jing influenced pretty much all aspects of classic Chinese thought, religion, philosophy, ritual, etc. Likewise the other five classics, on poetry, etiquette, etc.

These basically pre-date notions of Ru (Confucianism), Dao or Lao Zhuang (Daoism), etc.

~~ Huifeng

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
LastLegend wrote:
Confucius spoke of original face as neither good or evil. That is what Buddha spoke of.



LastLegend,

Could you please be so kind as to show where both Confucius and the Buddha said this?
Thanks!

~~ Huifeng

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:46 am 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Thank you to Hiseng and Ven. Huifeng for filling in a giant gap in my knowledge! I always naively assumed that Daoism (or the Tao Te Ching, to be more exact) predated the I Ching.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:11 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
Posts: 2445
Location: Washington DC
Huifeng wrote:
LastLegend wrote:
Confucius spoke of original face as neither good or evil. That is what Buddha spoke of.



LastLegend,

Could you please be so kind as to show where both Confucius and the Buddha said this?
Thanks!

~~ Huifeng


Quote:
b) The Master said, `Men are close to one another by nature. They diverge as a result of repeated practice' (A, 17:2).

http://www.crvp.org/book/Series03/III-2 ... d_huma.htm

As for Buddha, Buddha nature is not relatively good or bad because it is free of self. Must I provide passage for this?

_________________
NAMO AMITABHA
NAM MO A DI DA PHAT (VIETNAMESE)
NAMO AMITUOFO (CHINESE)

Linjii
―Listen! Those of you who devote yourselves to the Dharma
must not be afraid of losing your bodies and your lives―


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
LastLegend wrote:
Huifeng wrote:
LastLegend wrote:
Confucius spoke of original face as neither good or evil. That is what Buddha spoke of.



LastLegend,

Could you please be so kind as to show where both Confucius and the Buddha said this?
Thanks!

~~ Huifeng


Quote:
b) The Master said, `Men are close to one another by nature. They diverge as a result of repeated practice' (A, 17:2).

http://www.crvp.org/book/Series03/III-2 ... d_huma.htm

As for Buddha, Buddha nature is not relatively good or bad because it is free of self. Must I provide passage for this?


Hmmm, for Kong Fuzi still a fair leap into non-evil-or-good original faces for me, I'm afraid!
子曰:「性相近也,習相遠也。」
From the statement alone, the 性 is only said to be 相近, with no mention of either 善 or 惡. Though this was apparently a key point of debate for later Chinese philosophy in general...

As for the Buddha, see what you can find (other than the Platform Classic). I'm certainly unfamiliar with such a statement.

~~ Huifeng

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:34 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
Posts: 2445
Location: Washington DC
That is all I can do. Much of my learning comes from Vietnamese audio and video transalation of Master Chin Kung's Dharma talks . I don't know Chinese so. I cannot dispute you there. I am just using words-Buddha nature, original face, common nature, natural state, etc. These are just words that point to the same thing.

Repeated practice as I understand is habits/karma.

_________________
NAMO AMITABHA
NAM MO A DI DA PHAT (VIETNAMESE)
NAMO AMITUOFO (CHINESE)

Linjii
―Listen! Those of you who devote yourselves to the Dharma
must not be afraid of losing your bodies and your lives―


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], WoodsyLadyM and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group