Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 853
Should Sanskrit vocalic "r" be pronounced as a plain "r" or as "ri"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:11 am
Posts: 383
Pronunciation of the Sanskrit vowels.

_________________
Lamrim, lojong, and mahamudra are the unmistaken path.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 853
That site seems to have removed the recordings for both long and short "r" although I assume they used the "ri" pronunciation since he contrasts it with the plain "r" sound. Anyway, what I actually want to know is if there are still places in India where they use a plain "r" and whether Sakya Pandita mentioned it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
Sherlock wrote:
Should Sanskrit vocalic "r" be pronounced as a plain "r" or as "ri"?


There are numerous forms of Sanskrit pronunciation.
See what works.

~~ Huifeng

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 853
I just watched an old video of ChNN explaining the ganapuja and he pronounced "amrta". :namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:06 pm
Posts: 70
Location: St Andrews, Scotland
It ought to be pronounced between 'ri' and 'ru'.

Some Indians pronounce it as outright /ru/. But its not correct.

So, the correct modern realization of vocalic "r" would be something between /ri/ and /ru/ - neither /i/ nor /u/ but a pronunciation bordering the two.

V

_________________
http://www.virtualvinodh.com

yo dharmaṁ paśyati, sa buddhaṁ paśyati

One who sees the Dharma, sees the Buddha
śālistamba sūtra

na pudgalo na ca skandhā buddho jñānamanāsravam
sadāśāntiṁ vibhāvitvā gacchāmi śaraṇaṁ hyaham

Neither a person nor the aggregates, the Buddha, is knowledge free from [evil] outflows
Clearly perceiving [him] to be eternally serene, I go for refuge [in him]
saddharma-laṅkāvatāra-sūtra


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 853
vinodh wrote:
It ought to be pronounced between 'ri' and 'ru'.

Some Indians pronounce it as outright /ru/. But its not correct.

So, the correct modern realization of vocalic "r" would be something between /ri/ and /ru/ - neither /i/ nor /u/ but a pronunciation bordering the two.

V


Are you talking about your local variation of Sanskrit pronunciation? My main question was in reference to the historical pronunciation -- at some point, linguists say it was pronounced as a pure /r/, like the vocalic "r" in some Slavic languages; the Serbian name for their own language is spelled Srpski and pronounced [sr̩̂pskiː] for example. Do any Indians today still pronounce vocalic "r" as /r/?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanskrit vocalic "r"
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:06 pm
Posts: 70
Location: St Andrews, Scotland
Quote:
Are you talking about your local variation of Sanskrit pronunciation?


This is how the majority of the Indians attempt to pronounce it.

And no Indians will pronounce it as 'r'.

Quote:
My main question was in reference to the historical pronunciation


As for the historical pronunciation. People are not quite clear.

IIRC in several sources I read it was reconstructed as 'ar' (sort of a rhotic vowel). Because, the Vriddhi and Guna forms for vocalic 'r' are 'ar' and 'aar' respectively. In a similar vein, the Pali equivalents of the Sanskrit words have 'a' in the place of vocalic 'r'.

This would explain why at Sandhi, vocalic 'r' grammatically mutates into 'ar (and the degradation of vocalic 'r' to 'a' in Pali)'. So it seems correct to consider it historically as a rhotic vowel, which at some point became /ri~ru/.

V

_________________
http://www.virtualvinodh.com

yo dharmaṁ paśyati, sa buddhaṁ paśyati

One who sees the Dharma, sees the Buddha
śālistamba sūtra

na pudgalo na ca skandhā buddho jñānamanāsravam
sadāśāntiṁ vibhāvitvā gacchāmi śaraṇaṁ hyaham

Neither a person nor the aggregates, the Buddha, is knowledge free from [evil] outflows
Clearly perceiving [him] to be eternally serene, I go for refuge [in him]
saddharma-laṅkāvatāra-sūtra


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group