Blue Garuda wrote:If we hold up a mirror to our minds it is seldom a pretty sight.
Speak for yourself. I'm gorgeous.
Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
Blue Garuda wrote:If we hold up a mirror to our minds it is seldom a pretty sight.
pemachophel wrote:A little off topic, but Jetsun Shuksep, Chonyid Wangmo, was ordered to walk around the Bar-khor in Lhasa completely naked which she did.
Malcolm wrote:The easiest thing in the world to do is walk naked, and the hardest. We have to take off the clothes we put on in which to admire ourselves. If we don't, then we never see the truth of ourselves. We are naked to others even if we think we are clothed.
asunthatneversets wrote:

Now it's naked....the naked mindAdamantine wrote:Tara, you mine as well remove my whole post
since all context is now lost!

Adamantine wrote:well, for all this talk of nakedness...![]()
After a time, your tense, dualistic attitudes will evaporate and you will get to the point where gold and pebbles, food and filth, gods and demons, virtue and nonvirtue, are all the same for you-you’ll be at a loss to choose between paradise and hell! But until you reach that point (while you are still caught in the experiences of dualistic perception), virtue and nonvirtue, buddhafields and hells, happiness and pain, actions and their results – all this is reality for you. As the Great Guru has said, "My view is higher than the sky, but my attention to actions and their results is finer than flour."
So don’t go around claiming to be some great Dzogchen meditator when in fact you are nothing but a farting lout, stinking of alcohol and rank with lust! ~Dudjom Rinpoche excerpted from http://www.keithdowman.net/dzogchen/dudjom_counsel.htm
Malcolm wrote:The easiest thing in the world to do is walk naked, and the hardest. We have to take off the clothes we put on in which to admire ourselves. If we don't, then we never see the truth of ourselves. We are naked to others even if we think we are clothed.
Virgo wrote:Ogyen wrote:I might have to change all my materials to warn for X-rated content...
I could make some jokes, but I don't want to make light of Malcolm's point. It is important.![]()
P.S. And I could see this thread just degrading into jokes about being naked (which it probably will anyway).
Kevin
But the truth is that I'm protected by others' blindness, and that is one of my habits/weaknesses in how I hide my own vulnerabiliy - in plain sight in the notions people project that I don't bother correcting. It's a form of cowardice that I might not be liked for who I really feel I am. Another set of half-superstitions. I think everyone does it to some extent, I am ordinary in this way. I learned a long time ago about my own fears of vulnerability in being intimate with other human beings. I look in that mirror all the time, a seasoned there-goer like many other seekers, diving into all of my notions... it's always interesting to discover how much weight I put on around this or that inflation of Self, and go on an ego diet to lose a few pounds...
I want to know how the dharma is personal to YOU, not the clothes you wear to BE a buddhist. I go for the good stuff, love. It's the recognition of the other that lets you be present with the other.
Made from 100% recycled karmaOgyen wrote:
My reply was no joke... I was thinking, perhaps if my work were seen for what it is, I should blush, come to my senses and put some content warning on it......

Does it really matter how many Bonpos or Buddhists danced on the head of the Dzogchen pin or when? For me, the only thing that matters is to find myself in integration with what arises, or doesn't arise, in my continuum, 24/7. If something furthers this, I take it up as practice. If something doesn't further this, I respectfully let it go as irrelevant to what matters.
oldbob wrote:What will you tell Yama when he sends down his hook for you: that you had permission to teach Dzogchen, or that you taught Dzogchen, or that you are a Tulku, or that you translated the Dzogchen Tantras, or that you had a thousand lovers, or that you wrote beautiful poems, or that you danced a beautiful dance?![]()
![]()
oldbob wrote:Dear all and All,Does it really matter how many Bonpos or Buddhists danced on the head of the Dzogchen pin or when? For me, the only thing that matters is to find myself in integration with what arises, or doesn't arise, in my continuum, 24/7. If something furthers this, I take it up as practice. If something doesn't further this, I respectfully let it go as irrelevant to what matters.
Getting old means facing that I won't be here forever and time is short.
Even if you are young you might want to consider, that relative to eternity, 100 years is the blink of an eye, and that soon you will be old too: sickness and death follow.
What will you tell Yama when he sends down his hook for you: that you had permission to teach Dzogchen, or that you taught Dzogchen, or that you are a Tulku, or that you translated the Dzogchen Tantras, or that you had a thousand lovers, or that you wrote beautiful poems, or that you danced a beautiful dance?![]()
![]()
I don't think he will listen.
Instant presence is the singular point of the Dzogchen pin: on that point everything dances.
On that point, naked, without any place to dance, or possessing any characteristic whatsoever, Yama dances too.![]()
May this be of benefit to someone!
Long life to the Dzogchen Masters, in good health, and with success in all things!

