Banned wrote:My understanding is that Virupa's lineage descends from Mahamudra.
Is Lamdre just a branch of Mahamudra?
No it is much deeper than that it is the path and the fruit, the indivisible nature of Samsara and Nirvana.
Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
Banned wrote:My understanding is that Virupa's lineage descends from Mahamudra.
Is Lamdre just a branch of Mahamudra?
LunaRoja wrote:Banned wrote:My understanding is that Virupa's lineage descends from Mahamudra.
Is Lamdre just a branch of Mahamudra?
No it is much deeper than that it is the path and the fruit, the indivisible nature of Samsara and Nirvana.
Malcolm wrote:LunaRoja wrote:Banned wrote:My understanding is that Virupa's lineage descends from Mahamudra.
Is Lamdre just a branch of Mahamudra?
No it is much deeper than that it is the path and the fruit, the indivisible nature of Samsara and Nirvana.
The result of Lamdre is mahāmudra. It is not deeper than mahāmudra.
M
LunaRoja wrote:
It is not the same as Kagyu Mahamudra I thought it was from the unique point of view of the 3 Visions.
Malcolm wrote:LunaRoja wrote:
It is not the same as Kagyu Mahamudra I thought it was from the unique point of view of the 3 Visions.
Mahāmudra is one of the three tantras, the result tantra.
Sutra Mahāmudra = union of clarity and emptiness
Tantric mahāmudra = the result tantra
Essence mahāmudra = the inseperability of samsara and nirvana
LunaRoja wrote:Malcolm wrote:LunaRoja wrote:
It is not the same as Kagyu Mahamudra I thought it was from the unique point of view of the 3 Visions.
Mahāmudra is one of the three tantras, the result tantra.
Sutra Mahāmudra = union of clarity and emptiness
Tantric mahāmudra = the result tantra
Essence mahāmudra = the inseperability of samsara and nirvana
How does it differ from the Kagyu school?
Malcolm wrote:LunaRoja wrote:
How does it differ from the Kagyu school?
Mainly it is just difference in lineage. Result is the same.
N
LunaRoja wrote:Malcolm wrote:LunaRoja wrote:
How does it differ from the Kagyu school?
Mainly it is just difference in lineage. Result is the same.
N
There are philosophical difference since Sapan did not believe in the pointing out instructions...
but thought the great seal depended on initiation into a full Mandala. Sapan thought Mahamudra was totally free of concepts but criticized Gampopa's Mahamudra as just creating greater clarity and calm. He considered any sutra based non-tantric great seal to be impossible. Mahamudra in Sakya is depended on complete initiation into the Hevajra tantra. Now the Tsarpa Sakya I have been told do believe in pointing out instructions, but in general the Ngor and Khon lineages do not. So those are the major differences that I am aware of.
Malcolm wrote:As you probably know, I was a Sakya pracitioner for many years.
N
Matylda wrote:Malcolm wrote:As you probably know, I was a Sakya pracitioner for many years.
N
So did you give up sakya? In favor of ChNNR?
Banned wrote:Virupa's back lineage is actually Mahamudra isn't it?
Malcolm wrote:
No, I did not give up Sakya. But ChNN has been my primary root guru since 1992.
I unify, I don't abandon.
M
Malcolm wrote:Matylda wrote:Malcolm wrote:As you probably know, I was a Sakya pracitioner for many years.
N
So did you give up sakya? In favor of ChNNR?
No, I did not give up Sakya. But ChNN has been my primary root guru since 1992.
I unify, I don't abandon.
M

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest