mindyourmind wrote:Which sweeping generalization would you want us to address first?
Knotty Veneer wrote:mindyourmind wrote:Which sweeping generalization would you want us to address first?
The post is being provocative. These are not necessarily my views but indeed sweeping generalizations that are not uncommon among followers of “orthodox” Buddhist traditions. I am interested in seeing what people’s views are on the phenomenon of “Western Buddhism”.
mindyourmind wrote:The Dharma is a powerful message, it gets colored and changed and adapted to the society(ies) it evolves into. Hopefully we don't mess it up too badly. So far I think we are doing ok.
gyougan wrote:mindyourmind wrote:The Dharma is a powerful message, it gets colored and changed and adapted to the society(ies) it evolves into. Hopefully we don't mess it up too badly. So far I think we are doing ok.
The Chinese never watered down Buddhism like Westerners do these days.
My opinion is that we are living the Dharma Ending Age and proper Buddhism will never prosper in the West (in a big scale).
). Sorry to be a stickler for definitions, but it would certainly help me to understand what you're getting at and might us to avoid some confusion later, esp if the thread "takes wing."gyougan wrote:The Chinese never watered down Buddhism like Westerners do these days.
My opinion is that we are living the Dharma Ending Age and proper Buddhism will never prosper in the West (in a big scale).
kirtu wrote:gyougan wrote:The Chinese never watered down Buddhism like Westerners do these days.
My opinion is that we are living the Dharma Ending Age and proper Buddhism will never prosper in the West (in a big scale).
Unfortunately so. I'm thinking that in general the Sharmapa was right about his view on Dharma in the West. Most Westerners are not interested in universal lovingkindness and compassion or moral disciple. Westerners attracted to the Dharma aren't so much as well but adding to that they aren't much interested in alleviating suffering. A great Western Mahasiddha might be able to change this, maybe. However Buddhism has been in the West for 150 years although mostly confined to Asian ethnic communities. There have been Pure Land Westerners since around 1920 though.
Kirt
Knotty Veneer wrote:Western Buddhism (as opposed to Buddhism in the West) – it’s all stress reduction and McMindfulness or a platform for unqualified Westerners to get into the guru business. Not worth considering? Right?
Lobsang Damchoi wrote:Dear Knotty Veneer,
Geetings and top o' the mornin' to you!
If you want a considered answer (at least from me) you need to explain the distinction between "Western Buddhism" as opposed to Buddhism in the West (perhaps even consider using different terms). Sorry to be a stickler for definitions, but it would certainly help me to understand what you're getting at and might us to avoid some confusion later, esp if the thread "takes wing."
Cautiously interested,
Patrick
kirtu wrote:Most Westerners are not interested in universal lovingkindness and compassion or moral disciple. Westerners attracted to the Dharma aren't so much as well but adding to that they aren't much interested in alleviating suffering.

Knotty Veneer wrote:Western Buddhism (as opposed to Buddhism in the West) – it’s all stress reduction and McMindfulness or a platform for unqualified Westerners to get into the guru business. Not worth considering? Right?
Jnana wrote:kirtu wrote:Most Westerners are not interested in universal lovingkindness and compassion or moral disciple. Westerners attracted to the Dharma aren't so much as well but adding to that they aren't much interested in alleviating suffering.
Kirt, do you think the majority of people from contemporary Asian populations are much more interested in universal loving-kindness, compassion, or actually alleviating suffering through attaining the path? How about in the past?
kirtu wrote:And at least now we have ... Chinese of all ages opening to Tibetan Dharma and they are quite serious.
<-- me, that is. kirtu wrote:Many, but by no means all, Asians in American have essentially treated the Dharma like a lucky rabbits foot.
SARVA MANGALAM
Without clairvoyance, we cannot work for other sentient beings - Khunu Lama
Suddenly you will know the different knowledge without study - Thog-'bebs
One may now accomplish the welfare and instruction of all sentient beings, spontaneously and without effort, by simply being, that is to say, by manifesting one's enlightened nature through spontaneously emanating an infinity of Nirmanakaya manifestations - Vajranatha
Jnana wrote:kirtu wrote:Many, but by no means all, Asians in American have essentially treated the Dharma like a lucky rabbits foot.
I'd suggest that many Asians throughout Buddhist history have essentially treated the dharma like a lucky rabbits foot.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests