kirtu wrote:
Does always result in ö then or are there exceptions?
Kirt
Depends on suffix. O in འཁོར་sounds like "core"; o in ཡོངས་sounds more like so; འོད་ or བོད་sounds more like ö.
kirtu wrote:
Does always result in ö then or are there exceptions?
Kirt
kirtu wrote:Are there any indications of phrase beginnings and endings or is this a matter of inducing a phrase maybe from embedded verbs or particles? Tibetan clearly doesn't use comma function symbols.
But I have to study grammar some to even figure out what I'm reading (and of course this is a very advanced text). I am beginning to work on sight reading. After prayers what texts should I work on? I was looking at Sonam and Ruth Rinchen's version of Atisha's Lamp for the Path last night and it has the Tibetan as well and thought that might be something to work through.
Are there verb lists? I thought Preston had a book or paper on this (or perhaps he had done some computational linguistics work related to verbs)?
tantular wrote:Of course you need a foundation in grammar. It's important to memorize the forms and basic functions of the 15 sets of particles covered in the Sumchupa.

MrDistracted wrote:Padma Karpo Translation Committee provide a translation and translations of commentaries within Tony Duffs 800 page volume built on the sum chu pa.
You can get this as an e book/pdf http://www.tibet.dk/pktc/grammar.htm#St ... irtyVerses
Within this is a translation and commentary of two commentaries on the Sum chu pa by Yangchen Drubpey Dorje. These follw Situ Panchen's tradition. You can get these separately.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests