How accurate is this? On emptiness.

Whether you're exploring Buddhism for the first time or you're already on the path, feel free to ask questions of any kind here.

How accurate is this? On emptiness.

Postby Jesse » Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:37 pm

I am curious if this understanding is in line with Buddhist thought, if not could someone explain where I've gone wrong. (I wrote this in attempt to describe Buddhist philosophy to a friend.)
--------------------
Eternity is in the present moment. Think about everything you see, hear, smell, taste, touch.. how many of those things could be present before you, without everything else?

For example, when you look at a tree, how could the tree be there without the soil, water, sunshine, so what is the 'tree'? Is it just a symbol that represents everything it takes in order for that 'tree' to exist?

Expanding on that, every other single object we come into contact with shares this same abstraction, it does not exist by itself, nor does it contain any inherent properties, when you look at a desk, it is the product of trees, rocks, and humans, all of which are also the product of other things, and this process will never stop.

So, the entirety of our lives is composed of this sort of abstraction, our experience of the world is of a unity, a singular experience, the tree is also the sunshine, the tree is also the earth from which it grows, the tree is also a product of the awareness which is able to perceive it.

That awareness makes up our entire being, and that awareness is inseparable from the things which we are perceiving.

In essence, the entire universe is one, nothing in the universe can exist without the rest of the universe and similarly, physical existence can not exist without nothing-ness.

So by saying the universe had a very definite beginning, you are saying that at one point.. there was: something less than nothing.

Which makes no sense, and nothing is the very same substance from which something exists. they are inseparable in the same way that sound is impossible without silence.
---


Thank you.
User avatar
Jesse
 
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 6:54 am
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: How accurate is this? On emptiness.

Postby PadmaVonSamba » Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:10 pm

I think that expresses the concept of emptiness (sunyata) very well.

There might be other things that could be added, and emptiness can be understood in a variety of contexts or from different views, but what you have written is a very clear description. :applause:
Profile Picture: "The Foaming Monk"
The Chinese characters are Fo (buddha) and Ming (bright). The image is of a student of Buddhism, who, imagining himself to be a monk, and not understanding the true meaning of the words takes the sound of the words literally. Likewise, People on web forums sometime seem to be foaming at the mouth.
Original painting by P.Volker /used by permission.
User avatar
PadmaVonSamba
 
Posts: 2800
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am

Re: How accurate is this? On emptiness.

Postby Jesse » Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:01 pm

Thank you PadmaVonSamba,

I've realized I haven't understood it as well as I thought though.

:namaste:
User avatar
Jesse
 
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 6:54 am
Location: Virginia, USA


Return to Exploring Buddhism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: hop.pala and 16 guests

>