Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Whether you're exploring Buddhism for the first time or you're already on the path, feel free to ask questions of any kind here.

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby Hanzze » Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:18 am

Is it useful to seek for, or believe in a ultimate enlightenment a kind of ultimate being?
Just that! :-)
User avatar
Hanzze
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby ground » Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:52 am

It is useful to practice and reduce or (even better) eliminate papanca ("monkey mind").


Kind regards
User avatar
ground
 
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby retrofuturist » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:36 am

Greetings,

TMingyur wrote:It is useful to practice and reduce or (even better) eliminate papanca ("monkey mind").


:twothumbsup:

Image

Maitri,
Retro. :)
Live in concord, with mutual appreciation, without disputing, blending like milk and water, viewing each other with kindly eyes

Dhamma Wheel (Theravada forum) * Here Comes Trouble
User avatar
retrofuturist
Founding Member
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby Sherab » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:03 am

Is anyone advocating a completely blank mind? If not, what does eliminating papanca lead to? If the answer is insight, how does eliminating papanca leads to insight?
User avatar
Sherab
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:28 am

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby Jnana » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:56 pm

Sherab wrote:If not, what does eliminating papanca lead to? If the answer is insight, how does eliminating papanca leads to insight?

Insight (vipaśyanā) results in freedom from conceptual proliferation (niṣprapañca). This freedom from conceptual proliferation is noble gnosis (āryajñāna) which is devoid of apperception (saṃjñā) of existence or nonexistence (bhāvābhāva).

All the best,

Geoff
Jnana
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby Hanzze » Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:38 pm

Is there a point where we can see the different between papanca and insight? In a relative or ultimate way?
Just that! :-)
User avatar
Hanzze
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: Mahayana ultimative or relative?

Postby Jnana » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:45 pm

Hanzze wrote:Is there a point where we can see the different between papanca and insight? In a relative or ultimate way?

All differentiation of phenomena is relative. The entire path is relative. No phenomenon is ultimately established. Realizing this results in freedom from conceptual proliferation (niṣprapañca).

All the best,

Geoff
Jnana
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:58 pm

Previous

Return to Exploring Buddhism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

>