What would you say the 'same thing' is?dharmagoat wrote: Considering body and mind to be different aspects of the same thing, while avoiding both materialist and idealist conclusions, seems to make the most sense.
Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
The thing that it is observed to be. No more, no less.Paul wrote:What would you say the 'same thing' is?dharmagoat wrote: Considering body and mind to be different aspects of the same thing, while avoiding both materialist and idealist conclusions, seems to make the most sense.
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Can you extrapolate? Especially from an ontological POV.dharmagoat wrote:The thing that it is observed to be. No more, no less.Paul wrote:What would you say the 'same thing' is?dharmagoat wrote: Considering body and mind to be different aspects of the same thing, while avoiding both materialist and idealist conclusions, seems to make the most sense.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
I could make an attempt, but it would never be more than an attempt. Some things elude analysis, and I am a reluctant philosopher.Paul wrote:Can you extrapolate? Especially from an ontological POV.
Last edited by dharmagoat on Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Oh I see, yes, I agree that a simplistic model of causality is clearly... erm, simplistic, but I wouldn't go as far to say that Suzuki's pre-war model is wrong as such. The morality of intentional actions seems to apply on a gross behavioural level, but on more subtle levels it would still seem to carry some insight.Paul wrote:Well the issue for me is proving that rather than having simply an effect a cause has the kind of relation with an effect that the Buddhist view claims it does. Specifically, that an action with a positive intent has a pleasant result and that an action with a negative intent has a unpleasant result either in this life or a future life. I think this is what the initial post and some of the arguments by Alfredo have been getting at.futerko wrote:what I mean is that when you say "mere cause and effect," what you mean is material causality rather than the idea of causality within a mental continuum.
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
There is certainly some insight. I certainly believe (on basically a faith level) that there will be some possibly synchronistic relation between present intentions & actions and future experience. But if I try and prove this, or take a cold hard look at the philosophical basis of the Buddhist view of karma I'm not intellectually convinced by the explanations.futerko wrote:Oh I see, yes, I agree that a simplistic model of causality is clearly... erm, simplistic, but I wouldn't go as far to say that Suzuki's pre-war model is wrong as such. The morality of intentional actions seems to apply on a gross behavioural level, but on more subtle levels it would still seem to carry some insight.Paul wrote:Well the issue for me is proving that rather than having simply an effect a cause has the kind of relation with an effect that the Buddhist view claims it does. Specifically, that an action with a positive intent has a pleasant result and that an action with a negative intent has a unpleasant result either in this life or a future life. I think this is what the initial post and some of the arguments by Alfredo have been getting at.futerko wrote:what I mean is that when you say "mere cause and effect," what you mean is material causality rather than the idea of causality within a mental continuum.
However weird things I have experienced override any kind of rationality. And anyway, the Buddha said karma was incredibly hard to penetrate.
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
the modern mind has become so limited and single-visioned that it has lost touch with normal perception - John Michell
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
It's obvious on one level, but obscure on another. But as a common-sense attitude to life, it is the only sound basis for an ethical philosophy IMO. Apart from anything else, it makes you responsible for what happens. (Actually that reminds me of an Alan Watts aphorism 'Ultimately there is no difference between what you do and what happens to you'.)
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Thing is though, that the Buddha didn't always teach this one-to-one relationship between positive actions and positive effects. I recommend you take a look at the Maha Kammavibhanga Sutta: The Great Exposition of Kamma.Paul wrote:Well the issue for me is proving that rather than having simply an effect a cause has the kind of relation with an effect that the Buddhist view claims it does. Specifically, that an action with a positive intent has a pleasant result and that an action with a negative intent has a unpleasant result either in this life or a future life. I think this is what the initial post and some of the arguments by Alfredo have been getting at.
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE
"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Well, the lama I used to learn from had the view that everything is karma! To him, even the fact that the sun is shining is karma! hehejeeprs wrote:Throwing a stone at someone generates karma.
Dropping a stone in a pond generates ripples.
Ripples are an analogy for karma, but they're not karma.
I never quite understood his view correctly, but it just goes to show that there are many different Buddhist ideas about the scope of karma.
The different Buddhist views about karma would make a fascinating thread, if there isn't one like this already...
- dharmagoat
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Well, if it is believed that everything in the universe is a creation of mind (which is one hypothesis), then it follows that all phenomena are the playing out of karma.Luke wrote:Well, the lama I used to learn from had the view that everything is karma! To him, even the fact that the sun is shining is karma! hehejeeprs wrote:Throwing a stone at someone generates karma.
Dropping a stone in a pond generates ripples.
Ripples are an analogy for karma, but they're not karma.
I never quite understood his view correctly, but it just goes to show that there are many different Buddhist ideas about the scope of karma.
The different Buddhist views about karma would make a fascinating thread, if there isn't one like this already...
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9455
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
pulled this off of facebook this morning...
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
PadmaVonSamba wrote:pulled this off of facebook this morning...
Beautiful!
Re: Isn't Karma extrapolation?
Lol I almost missed it. Good one.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.