Emptiness and the two truths

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
Post Reply
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

Could someone please explain to me, in clear simple words, the Nagarjuna/Madhyamaka meaning of emptiness and the two truths?

Here's my current understanding:

At the level of relative truth, there is a real concrete world, filled with real concrete objects, in which real concrete things happen. It's the world most people believe is the only world, the real world.

At the level of absolute truth, there is only emptiness: phenomena with no inherent existence, intrinsic nature, ultimate essence. Absolute truth doesn't deny the existence of the world of objects, doesn't say it's all a grand illusion produced by mind; it only denies that these objects have inherent existence (i.e., that they are not subject to dependent origination).
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

One more:

Per Nagarjuna/Madhyamaka is there anything that DOES have intrinsic existence?

For example, emptiness. Or Buddha nature?
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
Posts: 17091
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA
Contact:

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Johnny Dangerous »

rachmiel wrote:One more:

Per Nagarjuna/Madhyamaka is there anything that DOES have intrinsic existence?

For example, emptiness. Or Buddha nature?

My understanding is that Prasangika Madhymaka refutes the entire concept of svabhava. Shentong states that buddha nature/nirvana/whatever is svabhava, empty of other, not empty of itself. I'm sure there's a ton missing there, but on a basic level I think that's the dichotomy.

One thing seems to be though, alot of times criticism of this position seems to be centered on the mistaken idea that Nagarjuna was somehow a nihilist, who was saying "nothing exists"..there is no statement there advocating inherent non existence either..which would actually just be another kind of inherent existence.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

Pali Sutta obviously, but i've always found this short one to sum up nicely the idea that polarities of existence and non existence actually simply are not truth.

Paging Malcolm to bring the knowledge.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs

Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared

-Khunu Lama
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

if you want i can send you the mulamadhyamakakarika by Nagarjuna to you via email or Skype. the Garfields version. it ought to be a good commentary also.
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

i dont think you will get a really satisfying answer to the two truths via Dharmawheel. you need to study and experience it yourself.
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
User avatar
Wayfarer
Former staff member
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:31 am
Location: AU

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Wayfarer »

I think your description is an accurate summary on the level of a general description of the topic. In other words, it explains the concept clearly enough. Where I think your issue is, revolves around the use of the word 'concrete'. Perhaps what you're trying to find is something to conceptualize as fundamental, something which can provide a foundation for one's sense of what exists.

I think what is at issue is finding that which is always so, which really is 'self-existent', that is, doesn't rely on anything else for its existence, the one 'true substance'. In the theistic traditions that might be Deity as the eternal ground of existence. I think the Buddhist approach is not to provide such resting place for the conceptual mind - not to provide a 'master concept' in terms of which everything else can be explained. It doesn't deny that there is one, but it does deny that it can be conceived as any particular entity or object of thought. Instead the task is always to understand how thought seeks to find some refuge in the notion of an absolute or something self-existent. That is why the Madhyamika employs the dialectical method to demonstrate that any such formulation is self-contradictory.

But at the same time, this doesn't deny the reality of karma and suffering. Even if we understand on the intellectual level that these things are ultimately non-existent, while they are still real for us, then we have to deal with them. That is the nature of the conventional reality which we're all part of.
'Only practice with no gaining idea' ~ Suzuki Roshi
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

KonchokZoepa wrote:if you want i can send you the mulamadhyamakakarika by Nagarjuna to you via email or Skype. the Garfields version. it ought to be a good commentary also.
Yes, please. (If it's legally sharable.) rachmiel at rachmiel dot org

Thanks! :-)
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

jeeprs wrote:I think what is at issue is finding that which is always so, which really is 'self-existent', that is, doesn't rely on anything else for its existence, the one 'true substance'. In the theistic traditions that might be Deity as the eternal ground of existence. I think the Buddhist approach is not to provide such resting place for the conceptual mind - not to provide a 'master concept' in terms of which everything else can be explained. It doesn't deny that there is one, but it does deny that it can be conceived as any particular entity or object of thought.
So is the prevalent conclusion among Buddhists that (Buddha thought that) there IS in fact an eternal ground, but that it's too dangerous for the mind to believe that, so the entire issue is deemed moot? Or that there is no eternal ground? Or that no one can ever know with certainty if there is or isn't?

It sounds a bit like this to me:

There's this guy who's been to the other side of the hill outside his village. He meets with a bunch of villagers who have not been to the other side of the hill. The village, btw, is in dire need of fresh water. They ask him: "Is there a fresh-water lake on the other side of the hill?" Rather than saying yes or no to them, he spends all his time trying to get them to understand why they are asking the question in the first place.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

Does this stand up in court?

-------------------------

One of the main assertions of Buddhism is impermanence: everything is constantly changing.

To try to observe the impermanence of the seemingly concrete, enduring objects in the world (of relative truth) is futile. Our sensorium is not sensitive enough to detect the micro-changes going on in a rock moment to moment.

But there is something whose constant change we *can* observe: the goings on in our mind. So, to observe impermanence in action, look no further than at your own mind.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
User avatar
futerko
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:58 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by futerko »

rachmiel wrote:Does this stand up in court?

-------------------------

One of the main assertions of Buddhism is impermanence: everything is constantly changing.

To try to observe the impermanence of the seemingly concrete, enduring objects in the world (of relative truth) is futile. Our sensorium is not sensitive enough to detect the micro-changes going on in a rock moment to moment.

But there is something whose constant change we *can* observe: the goings on in our mind. So, to observe impermanence in action, look no further than at your own mind.
Isn't one of the issues for Buddhism that concepts tend to aim at permanence, so the universal idea, e.g. "cat", remains the same despite any actual experience of a particular cat?

(btw, nice site you have there)
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

i tried to send it via email but it was too big file to be able to send it. skype is an option if you have skype.
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

KonchokZoepa wrote:i tried to send it via email but it was too big file to be able to send it. skype is an option if you have skype.
Try emailing it to my gmail account: [email protected]

Thanks.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

no i cant send the file, its too big to send via email. sorry
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
User avatar
Grigoris
Former staff member
Posts: 21938
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Grigoris »

Anohter option is Hotmail skydrive, it allows up to 7gb sharing for free. Another option is to upload it scribd. Another option is to open a dropbox account. Another option is...
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE

"Butchers, prostitutes, those guilty of the five most heinous crimes, outcasts, the underprivileged: all are utterly the substance of existence and nothing other than total bliss."
The Supreme Source - The Kunjed Gyalpo
The Fundamental Tantra of Dzogchen Semde
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

i have dropbox but its full, skype is the easiest way since i dont want to create a hotmail account. actually i think i have it in dropbox. let me see. ill try to send it to you via dropbox.
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

i sent the dropbox link to your gmail. let me know in this thread if you succeeded to download it.

thanks sherab dorje for opening up a door :thanks:
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Rick »

Got it, thanks. :-)
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ...
KonchokZoepa
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by KonchokZoepa »

no problem. happy to be of benefit :smile: :namaste:
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo
Son of Buddha
Posts: 1123
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:48 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Son of Buddha »

"rachmiel"]
So is the prevalent conclusion among Buddhists that (Buddha thought that) there IS in fact an eternal ground, but that it's too dangerous for the mind to believe that, so the entire issue is deemed moot? Or that there is no eternal ground? Or that no one can ever know with certainty if there is or isn't?
it is the conclusion that is taught in the Thrid Turning Sutras.
Since this eternal ground is inconceivable to the ordinary there is no way of knowing if there is or isn't something "beyond"
we just have to take the Buddha's word on it.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .nypo.html
36. "When a monk's mind is thus freed, O monks, neither the gods with Indra, nor the gods with Brahma, nor the gods with the Lord of Creatures (Pajaapati), when searching will find[36] on what the consciousness of one thus gone (tathaagata) is based. Why is that? One who has thus gone is no longer traceable here and now, so I say."
Son of Buddha
Posts: 1123
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:48 pm

Re: Emptiness and the two truths

Post by Son of Buddha »

rachmiel wrote:Does this stand up in court?

-------------------------

One of the main assertions of Buddhism is impermanence: everything is constantly changing.

To try to observe the impermanence of the seemingly concrete, enduring objects in the world (of relative truth) is futile. Our sensorium is not sensitive enough to detect the micro-changes going on in a rock moment to moment.

But there is something whose constant change we *can* observe: the goings on in our mind. So, to observe impermanence in action, look no further than at your own mind.
Impermanence is not a good thing.
SN 22.46 Impermanent (2) pg 885 Ven Bodhi translation
At Savatthi. "Bhikkhus, form is impermanent.... Feeling is impermanent.... Preception is impermanent.... Volitional formations are impermanent.... Consciousness is impermanent. What is Impermanent is suffering. What is suffering is nonself. What is nonself should be seen as it really is with correct wisdom thus: This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self."
Post Reply

Return to “Dharma in Everyday Life”