imputation

Whether you're exploring Buddhism for the first time or you're already on the path, feel free to ask questions of any kind here.

imputation

Postby omnifriend » Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:05 pm

Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta
omnifriend
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:42 am

Re: imputation

Postby Jikan » Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:31 pm

I don't see how one could understand a definite article (the), for instance, as an ultimate reality. What is "the" ultimately? How about the verb "to be": what is "is" ultimately?

what ultimate existence would a grammatical marker have?
Need help getting on retreat? Want to support others in practice? Pay the Dana for Dharma forum a visit...

viewtopic.php?f=114&t=13727
Jikan
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5662
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: imputation

Postby ClearblueSky » Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:10 pm

It's not that they're imaginary, but our idea that it's a fixed permanent thing, and our idea that we see something as the "way it is" instead of through our own little filters and delusions, that keeps us from seeing the ultimate reality. We need to be careful not to delve too close to Nihilism.
And that's a pretty abstract question... but just as everyone has their own idea of what a place "is" that isn't real, it's the same for a word's meaning. "The" doesn't mean anything inherently, and thousands of years ago the word "the" was not even a concept (and it eventually probably won't again). And if you go to a country with another language now, the word "the" may still have no meaning, or may have a totally different one. It has no more solid reality than anything else.
User avatar
ClearblueSky
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:27 am

Re: imputation

Postby Johnny Dangerous » Thu Oct 10, 2013 3:02 am

omnifriend wrote:Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta


Language is even more made up than our projections, because it's just a way of describing the projections..
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull" -Tom Waits
User avatar
Johnny Dangerous
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Location: Olympia WA

Re: imputation

Postby muni » Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:22 am

omnifriend wrote:Hi, I understand that when I think of people, places, and things, in my mind they are imaginary, and not realities. but I am having difficulty seeing how certain words like the, or as, is, etc... how are these words not ultimate realities? thank you, metta


:namaste: I guess things are not so due to our habitual grasping mind. That one is even able to see a wrong and right Ultimate Reality and many more. It is a great artist, itself Ultimate Reality but without the recognition of its nature.

o o

Metta.
Theories can create an illusory distance between us and enlightenment.
muni
 
Posts: 3023
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am


Return to Exploring Buddhism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

>