Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:59 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10289
Location: Greece
Topic split from here.

invisiblediamond wrote:
The final analytic is nothingness.
What does this mean? :shrug:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:06 am
Posts: 106
Nihilists?
Why is middle way so bad?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 12:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 5:21 pm
Posts: 260
gregkavarnos wrote:
invisiblediamond wrote:
The final analytic is nothingness.
What does this mean? :shrug:


What?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:41 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10289
Location: Greece
invisiblediamond wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:
invisiblediamond wrote:
The final analytic is nothingness.
What does this mean? :shrug:


What?
What does "The final analytic is nothingness" mean? I don't understand what you are trying to say with this statement. I am trying to understand your statement. Do you understand what I am saying? What do I need to do to make myself clearer?

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:55 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
Posts: 2940
Location: Space is the Place
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:



Shel, Buddhist philosophy through the ages has taken
great pains to distinguish sunyata from "nothingness".

As Robert Thurman puts it "there's no such thing as nothing".
It's a fantasy.

_________________
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
Adamantine wrote:
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:



Shel, Buddhist philosophy through the ages has taken
great pains to distinguish sunyata from "nothingness".


How does that clarify Gregkavarnos's apparent cluelessness?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 1:54 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 am
Posts: 2940
Location: Space is the Place
shel wrote:
Adamantine wrote:
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:



Shel, Buddhist philosophy through the ages has taken
great pains to distinguish sunyata from "nothingness".


How does that clarify Gregkavarnos's apparent cluelessness?


Shel, he was confused by your statement "the final analytic is nothingness" which really is nonsensical, and my above statement should help you clarify why. If you meant to refer to emptiness, then "nothingness" is not a proper synonym.

_________________
Contentment is the ultimate wealth;
Detachment is the final happiness. ~Sri Saraha


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 2:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
Adamantine wrote:
Shel, he [gregkavarnos] was confused by your statement "the final analytic is nothingness"

Uh... it wasn't my statement.

Quote:
... which really is nonsensical, and my above statement should help you clarify why.

Nonsense. Nothing stands on the very same existential footing as something. Perhaps you'd care to be more specific in your existential claims.

Quote:
If you meant to refer to emptiness, then "nothingness" is not a proper synonym.

Gregkavarnos only recognizes proper synonyms? Alright, thanks for explaining. :tongue:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 2:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:34 am
Posts: 500
Adamantine wrote:
Shel, Buddhist philosophy through the ages has taken
great pains to distinguish sunyata from "nothingness".

As Robert Thurman puts it "there's no such thing as nothing".
It's a fantasy.

Johnny Dangerous wrote:
Emptiness is actually everything, and has no beginning, end, center etc. it's not nothingness or the opposite of existence.

In my experience, nothingness seems a good label for the fantasy/nightmare projected by ego as a perspective in which to hide -either permanently (c.f. 'desire for non-existence') or temporarily (if 'somethingness' is still the ideal)- when its maintenance becomes problematic. This concept of an impermeable 'fuzziness' that excludes everything -perhaps triggered by the delusion that one is fundamentally conscious of nothing but being conscious- is logicaly opposed to the emptiness that 'permeates' and includes everything: If there are no inherent identities or substances making up 'things', then both the 'things' and their absence are empty and there is therefore no backdrop that might otherwise override the 'things' in an ontological sense. This means there's no ultimate way of distinguishing a 'subjective' from an 'objective'.

This might all be off-topic if not for the confusion typically generated in beginners by the mahayana emphasis on emptiness that's rightly apparent on Dharmawheel. When understood, emptiness brings you down to earth, and -I'm told- this intellectual understanding is merely the beginning _ _

_________________
"Removing the barrier between this and that is the only solution" {Chogyam Trungpa - "The Lion's Roar"}


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:09 am
Posts: 11
It seems reasonable to say that "nothingness is at least a concept.
Emptiness in Buddhist terms on the other hand (right or left your choice) refers to the fact that nothing is existent on it's own , you can't break something down to a final something that is a unique "it". Reality tho is all around us. No?
Gassho
Lawrence


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:03 am 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 4612
Location: Baltimore, MD
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:


Emptiness is not nothingness.

Kirt

_________________
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:21 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Olympia WA
Since emptiness describes..well..everything, it's closer to everything than nothing, lol.

IIRC correctly Lankavatara says something like "things are nothing but a concatenation", that does not describe nothingness, only lack of independent existence.

_________________
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull" -Tom Waits


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:50 pm
Posts: 466
shel wrote:
Adamantine wrote:
Shel, he [gregkavarnos] was confused by your statement "the final analytic is nothingness"

Uh... it wasn't my statement.

Quote:
... which really is nonsensical, and my above statement should help you clarify why.

Nonsense. Nothing stands on the very same existential footing as something. Perhaps you'd care to be more specific in your existential claims.

Quote:
If you meant to refer to emptiness, then "nothingness" is not a proper synonym.

Gregkavarnos only recognizes proper synonyms? Alright, thanks for explaining. :tongue:


It's curious that we're even having this discussion on a buddhist forum. Greg is not just being pedantic shel, they are simply not synonyms.

Perhaps a read of this thread viewtopic.php?f=39&t=9728 will help (despite its meanderings) although I'm none the wiser as to what is considered to be wrong with Je Tsongkhapa's view of emptiness.

_________________
Unless the inner forces of negative emotions are conquered
Strife with outer enemies will never end.
~Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
kirtu wrote:
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:


Emptiness is not nothingness.

Kirt

Try thinking of it as no-thingness. Maybe that will help? :shrug:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:17 pm 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 4612
Location: Baltimore, MD
shel wrote:
kirtu wrote:
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:


Emptiness is not nothingness.

Kirt

Try thinking of it as no-thingness. Maybe that will help? :shrug:


There's a big difference between no-thingness, nothingness and emptiness.

Kirt

_________________
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 1596
shel wrote:
kirtu wrote:
shel wrote:
Emptiness, Mr. gregkavarnos, emptiness. You do know what that is I trust. Even if you believe it's all theoretical. :tongue:


Emptiness is not nothingness.

Kirt

Try thinking of it as no-thingness. Maybe that will help? :shrug:

That will help a lot.
There is no such thing as nothingness. Nobody ever experienced nothingness. It is a dead word.

_________________
Say what you think about me here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
kirtu wrote:
There's a big difference between no-thingness, nothingness and emptiness.

Kirt

Alright, why don't we try no-[inherent]-thingness. Is that working for you yet? :tongue:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:53 pm 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Olympia WA
I've never liked the term No-thingness because it seemingly implies a lack of things, and emptiness isn't lack or abundance, multiplicity or singularity of stuff, its just the mode of how things are. Then again, the term emptiness seems to get misinterpreted as some sort of nihilistic lack of existence by many non-Buddhists, and perhaps even some Buddhists. So..words fail.

_________________
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull" -Tom Waits


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 1500
Emptiness does mean the lack of an abiding self. Nihilism is about lack of meaning, quite different.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group